Cognitive performance and brain dynamics during walking with a novel bionic foot: A pilot study.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
22
06
2018
accepted:
19
03
2019
entrez:
4
4
2019
pubmed:
4
4
2019
medline:
18
1
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The objectives are to determine neural dynamics during gait using electro-encephalography and source localization, and to investigate the attentional demand during walking in able-bodied individuals, and individuals with an amputation. Six able-bodied individuals conducted one experimental trial, and 6 unilateral transtibial and 6 unilateral transfemoral amputees performed 2 experimental trials; the first with the prosthesis currently used by the subjects and the second with a novel powered transtibial prosthesis, i.e. the Ankle Mimicking Prosthetic foot 4.0. Each experimental trial comprised 2 walking tasks; 6 and 2 minutes treadmill walking at normal speed interspersed by 5 minutes of rest. During 6 minutes walking the Sustained Attention to Response (go-no go) Task, which measures reaction time and accuracy, was performed. Electro-encephalographic data were gathered when subjects walked 2 minutes. Motor-related cortical potentials and brain source activity during gait were examined. Normality and (non-) parametric tests were conducted (p<0.05). In contrast to transtibial amputees, transfemoral amputees required more attentional demands during walking with Ankle Mimicking Prosthetic foot 4.0 compared to the current passive prosthetic device and able-bodied individuals (reaction time and accuracy: p≤0.028). Since risk of falling is associated with altered attentional demands, propulsive forces of the novel device need to be better controlled for transfemoral amputees. No motor-related cortical potentials at Cz were observed in transfemoral amputees walking with the novel prosthesis, whereas motor-related cortical potentials between transtibial amputees and able-bodied individuals during walking at normal speed did not differ. The first positive electro-physiological peak deflection appeared during toe-off phase and showed higher activity within the underlying brain sources in transtibial amputees walking with Ankle Mimicking Prosthetic foot 4.0 compared to able-bodied individuals. The required higher neural input to accomplish the same physical activity compared to able-bodied individuals is possibly due to the limited acclimation period to the novel device and consequently increased afferent sensory feedback for postural control.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30943265
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214711
pii: PONE-D-18-11533
pmc: PMC6447229
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0214711Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Neural Eng. 2015 Aug;12(4):046022
pubmed: 26083595
Neurosci Lett. 2015 Jul 10;599:75-80
pubmed: 26003448
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:2111-4
pubmed: 19964782
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2016 Aug;40(4):490-6
pubmed: 26209423
Gait Posture. 2000 Dec;12(3):257-64
pubmed: 11154937
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Jan;21(1):93-104
pubmed: 18476764
J Mot Behav. 2011;43(3):193-201
pubmed: 21462065
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Feb 25;8:93
pubmed: 24611043
J Child Orthop. 2013 Nov;7(5):367-71
pubmed: 24432096
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 May 12;9:247
pubmed: 26029077
Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 15;54(2):1289-96
pubmed: 20832484
Neuropsychologia. 1997 Jun;35(6):747-58
pubmed: 9204482
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Dec 01;9:639
pubmed: 26648858
Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Jan;126(1):154-9
pubmed: 24910150
Mov Disord. 2008 Feb 15;23(3):329-42; quiz 472
pubmed: 18058946
Brain Sci. 2013 Dec 31;4(1):1-48
pubmed: 24961699
Biomed Eng Online. 2016 Dec 19;15(Suppl 3):145
pubmed: 28105954
Exp Brain Res. 1982;48(1):144-8
pubmed: 7140885
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2014 Jan;22(1):138-48
pubmed: 24122571
Front Neurosci. 2017 Jun 30;11:356
pubmed: 28713232
Ageing Res Rev. 2014 Jul;16:83-104
pubmed: 24915643
Biol Cybern. 1976 Jul 14;23(2):99-119
pubmed: 949512
Neuroreport. 1994 Dec 20;5(18):2593-7
pubmed: 7696611
J Biomech. 2006;39(5):948-57
pubmed: 16488233
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 May 26;106(21):8719-24
pubmed: 19433790
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1996 Mar;3(2):59-64
pubmed: 8713545
Gait Posture. 2002 Aug;16(1):1-14
pubmed: 12127181
Exp Brain Res. 2010 May;203(1):181-91
pubmed: 20364340
Int J Psychophysiol. 2014 Jan;91(1):22-9
pubmed: 24076470
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 30;12(11):e0188500
pubmed: 29190704
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Jun;103(6):3526-34
pubmed: 20410364
J Mot Behav. 2009 Jul;41(4):347-55
pubmed: 19508961
Neurosci Lett. 2014 Feb 21;561:166-70
pubmed: 24412128
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2016 Feb 15;120(4):464-6
pubmed: 26404617
Behav Brain Res. 2005 Jun 3;161(1):141-54
pubmed: 15904721
J Physiol. 2012 May 15;590(10):2443-52
pubmed: 22393252
Prog Neurobiol. 1992;38(1):35-56
pubmed: 1736324
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018 Oct;42(5):504-510
pubmed: 29623812