Expandable Lattice Electrode Ablation Catheter: A Novel Radiofrequency Platform Allowing High Current at Low Density for Rapid, Titratable, and Durable Lesions.
arrhythmias, cardiac
catheter ablation
heart atria
radiofrequency
swine
Journal
Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology
ISSN: 1941-3084
Titre abrégé: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101474365
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2019
04 2019
Historique:
entrez:
5
4
2019
pubmed:
5
4
2019
medline:
8
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
High-current short-duration radiofrequency energy delivery has potential advantages for cardiac ablation. However, this strategy is limited by high current density and narrow safety-to-efficacy window. The objective of this study was to examine a novel strategy for radiofrequency energy delivery using a new electrode design capable of delivering high power at a low current density to increase the therapeutic range of radiofrequency ablation. The Sphere9 is an expandable spheroid-shaped lattice electrode design with an effective surface area 10-fold larger than standard irrigated electrodes (lattice catheter). It incorporates 9 surface temperature sensors with ablation performed in a temperature-controlled mode. Phase I: in 6 thigh muscle preparations, 2 energy settings for atrial ablation were compared between the lattice and irrigated-tip catheters (low-energy: T In the thigh model, the lattice catheter resulted in wider lesions at both low- and high-energy settings (18.7±3.3 versus 12.2±1.7 mm, P<0.0001; 19.4±2.4 versus 12.3±1.7 mm, P<0.0001). Atrial lines created with the lattice were wider (posterior: 14.7±3.4 versus 9.2±4.0 mm, P<0.0001; lateral: 15.8±4.2 versus 5.7±4.2 mm, P<0.0001) and required 85% shorter ablation time (12.4 versus 79.8 s/cm-line). While current squared (I In this preclinical model, a novel, high-current low-density radiofrequency ablation strategy created contiguous and durable ablation lines in significantly less ablation time and a comparable safety profile.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
High-current short-duration radiofrequency energy delivery has potential advantages for cardiac ablation. However, this strategy is limited by high current density and narrow safety-to-efficacy window. The objective of this study was to examine a novel strategy for radiofrequency energy delivery using a new electrode design capable of delivering high power at a low current density to increase the therapeutic range of radiofrequency ablation.
METHODS
The Sphere9 is an expandable spheroid-shaped lattice electrode design with an effective surface area 10-fold larger than standard irrigated electrodes (lattice catheter). It incorporates 9 surface temperature sensors with ablation performed in a temperature-controlled mode. Phase I: in 6 thigh muscle preparations, 2 energy settings for atrial ablation were compared between the lattice and irrigated-tip catheters (low-energy: T
RESULTS
In the thigh model, the lattice catheter resulted in wider lesions at both low- and high-energy settings (18.7±3.3 versus 12.2±1.7 mm, P<0.0001; 19.4±2.4 versus 12.3±1.7 mm, P<0.0001). Atrial lines created with the lattice were wider (posterior: 14.7±3.4 versus 9.2±4.0 mm, P<0.0001; lateral: 15.8±4.2 versus 5.7±4.2 mm, P<0.0001) and required 85% shorter ablation time (12.4 versus 79.8 s/cm-line). While current squared (I
CONCLUSIONS
In this preclinical model, a novel, high-current low-density radiofrequency ablation strategy created contiguous and durable ablation lines in significantly less ablation time and a comparable safety profile.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30943762
doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.007090
pmc: PMC6652200
mid: NIHMS1522526
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e007090Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : T32 HL007374
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018 Oct;11(10):e006690
pubmed: 30354405
Int J Hyperthermia. 2003 May-Jun;19(3):267-94
pubmed: 12745972
Europace. 2015 Aug;17(8):1229-35
pubmed: 26041872
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Apr;4(4):467-479
pubmed: 30067486
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Aug;14(8):1234-1240
pubmed: 28455271
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Feb;11(2):194-201
pubmed: 24177370
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015 Apr;26(4):371-377
pubmed: 25534677
Circulation. 1990 Sep;82(3):1034-8
pubmed: 2393987
Open Biomed Eng J. 2007 Sep 19;1:47-52
pubmed: 19662127
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018 Sep;29(9):1287-1296
pubmed: 29846987
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1994 Oct;5(10):863-76
pubmed: 7874332
Am Heart J. 1981 May;101(5):593-600
pubmed: 6164281