Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of IDH1 Mutation in Progressive Gliomas by Allele-Specific qPCR and Western Blot Analysis.
chemotherapy
glioblastoma
isocitrate dehydrogenase 1
qPCR
sequencing
Journal
Technology in cancer research & treatment
ISSN: 1533-0338
Titre abrégé: Technol Cancer Res Treat
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101140941
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 01 2019
01 01 2019
Historique:
entrez:
5
4
2019
pubmed:
5
4
2019
medline:
14
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To date, diagnosis of IDH1 mutation is based on DNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry, methods limited in terms of sensitivity and ease of use. Recently, the diagnosis of IDH1 mutation by real-time polymerase chain reaction was introduced as an alternative method. In this study, real-time polymerase chain reaction was validated as a tool for detection of IDH1 mutation, and expression levels were analyzed for correlation with course of the disease. A total of 113 tumor samples were obtained intraoperatively from 84 patients with glioma having a diagnosis of diffuse glioma (World Health Organization II), anaplastic glioma (World Health Organization III), secondary glioblastoma ± chemotherapy, primary glioblastoma ± chemotherapy (World Health Organization IV). Tumor samples were snap frozen and processed for sectioning and RNA and protein isolation. Presence of IDH1 mutation was determined by DNA sequencing. Hereafter, quantitative expression of IDH1 messenger RNA was assessed using real-time polymerase chain reaction with specific primers for IDH1 mutation and -wt; protein expression was verified by Western Blot analysis and immunohistochemistry. Additionally, 19 samples of low-grade glioma and their consecutive high-grade glioma were analyzed at different time points of the disease. IDH1 mutation was identified in 63% of samples by DNA sequencing. In correlation with the real-time polymerase chain reaction results, a cutoff value was determined. Above this threshold, sensitivity and specificity of real-time polymerase chain reaction in detecting IDH1 mutation were 98% and 94%, respectively. Quantitative analysis revealed that IDH1 mutation expression is upregulated in secondary glioblastoma (mean ± standard error of mean: 3.52 ± 0.55) compared to lower grade glioma (II = 1.54 ± 0.22; III = 1.67 ± 0.23). In contrast, IDH1 wt expression is upregulated in all glioma grades (concentration >0.1) compared to control brain tissue (0.007 ± 0.0016). Western Blot analysis showed a high concordance to both sequencing and real-time polymerase chain reaction results in qualitative analysis of IDH1 mutation status (specificity 100% and sensitivity 100%). Moreover, semiquantitative protein expression analysis also showed higher expression levels of mutated IDH1 in secondary glioblastoma. In our study, real-time polymerase chain reaction and Western Blot analysis were found to be highly efficient methods in detecting IDH1 mutation in glioma samples. As cost-effective and time-saving methods, real-time polymerase chain reaction and Western Blot analysis may therefore play an important role in IDH1 mutation analysis in the future. IDH1 mutation expression level was found to correlate with the course of disease to a certain extent. Yet, clinical factors as recurrent disease or prior radiochemotherapy did not alter IDH1 mutation expression level.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30943868
doi: 10.1177/1533033819828396
pmc: PMC6457076
doi:
Substances chimiques
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase
EC 1.1.1.41
IDH1 protein, human
EC 1.1.1.42.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1533033819828396Références
Cancer. 2000 Jun 15;88(12):2887
pubmed: 10870076
Science. 2008 Sep 26;321(5897):1807-12
pubmed: 18772396
Acta Neuropathol. 2008 Dec;116(6):597-602
pubmed: 18985363
N Engl J Med. 2009 Feb 19;360(8):765-73
pubmed: 19228619
Am J Pathol. 2009 Apr;174(4):1149-53
pubmed: 19246647
Science. 2009 Apr 10;324(5924):261-5
pubmed: 19359588
Int J Cancer. 2009 Jul 15;125(2):353-5
pubmed: 19378339
Acta Neuropathol. 2009 Oct;118(4):469-74
pubmed: 19554337
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Sep 1;27(25):4150-4
pubmed: 19636000
Brain Pathol. 2010 Mar;20(2):298-300
pubmed: 19744125
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 1;27(34):5743-50
pubmed: 19805672
Nature. 2009 Dec 10;462(7274):739-44
pubmed: 19935646
Acta Neuropathol. 2010 Apr;119(4):509-11
pubmed: 20044756
Acta Neuropathol. 2010 Apr;119(4):501-7
pubmed: 20131059
J Mol Diagn. 2010 Jul;12(4):487-92
pubmed: 20431032
Mol Diagn Ther. 2010 Jun 1;14(3):163-9
pubmed: 20560678
J Mol Diagn. 2010 Nov;12(6):750-6
pubmed: 20847279
Hum Mutat. 2010 Dec;31(12):1360-5
pubmed: 20886613
Acta Neuropathol. 2010 Dec;120(6):707-18
pubmed: 21088844
Nat Med. 2011 Mar;17(3):291-3
pubmed: 21383741
Brain Tumor Pathol. 2011 Jul;28(3):177-83
pubmed: 21442241
Clin Neuropathol. 2011 Sep-Oct;30(5):217-30
pubmed: 21955925
Int J Oncol. 2012 Jun;40(6):2058-62
pubmed: 22447191
Neuro Oncol. 2013 Jun;15(6):682-90
pubmed: 23410661
Apoptosis. 2013 Nov;18(11):1416-1425
pubmed: 23801081
Neurology. 2013 Oct 22;81(17):1515-22
pubmed: 24068788
Brain Tumor Pathol. 2015 Jan;32(1):22-30
pubmed: 24748374
Cancer Res. 2014 Sep 1;74(17):4836-44
pubmed: 25035396