Clinical outcomes of chemical pleurodesis using a minocycline.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anti-Bacterial Agents
/ administration & dosage
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Minocycline
/ administration & dosage
Pleural Effusion, Malignant
/ mortality
Pleurodesis
/ methods
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator
/ administration & dosage
Young Adult
inflammation
intrapleural urokinase
malignant pleural effusion
pleurodesis
survival
Journal
Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease
ISSN: 1753-4666
Titre abrégé: Ther Adv Respir Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101316317
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
5
4
2019
pubmed:
5
4
2019
medline:
10
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pleurodesis is often used to prevent the re-accumulation of a malignant pleural effusion (MPE). Intrapleural urokinase (IPUK) therapy facilitates lung re-expansion for patients with loculated MPE or a trapped lung that allows subsequent pleurodesis. MPE management has been traditionally regarded as a symptomatic treatment. We tried to evaluate their impact on patient survival. There were 314 consecutive patients with symptomatic MPE that underwent minocycline pleurodesis with ( n = 109) and without ( n = 205) the antecedent IPUK therapy between September 2005 and August 2015, who were recruited for the pleurodesis outcome and survival analysis. The rate of successful pleurodesis was similar between the simple pleurodesis group and the IPUK therapy group followed by the pleurodesis group (69.0% versus 70.5%; p = 0.804). The patients who succeeded pleurodesis had a longer survival rate than those who failed in either the simple pleurodesis group (median, 414 versus 100 days; p < 0.001) or the IPUK therapy followed by pleurodesis group (259 versus 102 days; p < 0.001). The survival differences remained when the lung and breast cancer patients were studied separately. Successful pleurodesis translated into a better survival rate that promotes performing pleurodesis on lung re-expansion. The apparent shorter survival of the patients with loculated MPE or trapped lung, and those that did not respond to the IPUK therapy, lowered the probability of the survival benefit through the simple physical barrier by the fibrin formation to prevent the tumor spreading. The successfully induced inflammatory response by minocycline is supposed to prohibit the tumor invasion and metastasis. Further studies are warranted to clarify the mechanism and provide opportunities to develop novel therapeutic strategies.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Pleurodesis is often used to prevent the re-accumulation of a malignant pleural effusion (MPE). Intrapleural urokinase (IPUK) therapy facilitates lung re-expansion for patients with loculated MPE or a trapped lung that allows subsequent pleurodesis. MPE management has been traditionally regarded as a symptomatic treatment. We tried to evaluate their impact on patient survival.
METHODS
There were 314 consecutive patients with symptomatic MPE that underwent minocycline pleurodesis with ( n = 109) and without ( n = 205) the antecedent IPUK therapy between September 2005 and August 2015, who were recruited for the pleurodesis outcome and survival analysis.
RESULTS
The rate of successful pleurodesis was similar between the simple pleurodesis group and the IPUK therapy group followed by the pleurodesis group (69.0% versus 70.5%; p = 0.804). The patients who succeeded pleurodesis had a longer survival rate than those who failed in either the simple pleurodesis group (median, 414 versus 100 days; p < 0.001) or the IPUK therapy followed by pleurodesis group (259 versus 102 days; p < 0.001). The survival differences remained when the lung and breast cancer patients were studied separately.
CONCLUSION
Successful pleurodesis translated into a better survival rate that promotes performing pleurodesis on lung re-expansion. The apparent shorter survival of the patients with loculated MPE or trapped lung, and those that did not respond to the IPUK therapy, lowered the probability of the survival benefit through the simple physical barrier by the fibrin formation to prevent the tumor spreading. The successfully induced inflammatory response by minocycline is supposed to prohibit the tumor invasion and metastasis. Further studies are warranted to clarify the mechanism and provide opportunities to develop novel therapeutic strategies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30945619
doi: 10.1177/1753466619841231
pmc: PMC6454655
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator
EC 3.4.21.73
Minocycline
FYY3R43WGO
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Pagination
1753466619841231Références
Chest. 1999 Mar;115(3):729-33
pubmed: 10084484
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 Sep;173(3):781-3
pubmed: 10470923
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Nov;162(5):1987-2001
pubmed: 11069845
N Engl J Med. 2003 Apr 3;348(14):e4
pubmed: 12672879
J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Jun;45(6):613-9
pubmed: 1607900
J Thorac Oncol. 2006 Jun;1(5):460-7
pubmed: 17409900
Chest. 2009 Jan;135(1):201-209
pubmed: 19136407
Immunol Rev. 2008 Dec;226:205-18
pubmed: 19161426
Cancer Cell. 2009 Feb 3;15(2):103-13
pubmed: 19185845
Nat Rev Cancer. 2009 May;9(5):361-71
pubmed: 19343034
Nat Med. 2009 Oct;15(10):1170-8
pubmed: 19767732
Carcinogenesis. 2010 Jan;31(1):37-49
pubmed: 19955394
Cell. 2010 Mar 19;140(6):883-99
pubmed: 20303878
Int J Biol Markers. 2010 Jan-Mar;25(1):12-20
pubmed: 20306450
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2010 Apr;14(4):263-8
pubmed: 20496533
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2011 Jun;19(3-4):238-43
pubmed: 21885549
Pulm Med. 2012;2012:806183
pubmed: 22536501
Lancet. 2013 Apr 13;381(9874):1277-82
pubmed: 23489754
Chest. 2014 Oct;146(4):1007-1012
pubmed: 24853674
Thorax. 2014 Dec;69(12):1098-104
pubmed: 25100651
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 19;10(3):e0120852
pubmed: 25789627
Med Oncol. 2015 Jun;32(6):612
pubmed: 25958101
J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2015 Jul;22(3):215-25
pubmed: 26165892
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 08;(5):CD010529
pubmed: 27155783
BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 13;16:463
pubmed: 27411914
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Feb 15;197(4):502-508
pubmed: 28926296
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Mar;151(3 Pt 1):785-90
pubmed: 7881671
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999 Jan;159(1):37-42
pubmed: 9872815