Transitions in auditory rehabilitation with bone conduction implants (BCI).
Middle ear surgery
bone conduction implants
hearing loss
Journal
Acta oto-laryngologica
ISSN: 1651-2251
Titre abrégé: Acta Otolaryngol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0370354
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
6
4
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
6
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The bone conductive implants (BCI) are nowadays a reliable alternative for rehabilitation of specific forms of hearing loss, i.e. conductive, mixed or single sided deafness (SSD). Aims/Objective: To analyse the various factors in play when considering an auditory rehabilitation with a bone-conductive device (BCI). The clinical charts of subjects who underwent BCI application at the same Implanting Center from 2005 to 2018 were retrieved analysing also the reason for eventual explantation and the alternative option (transition) for hearing rehabilitation. Nine BAHA Compact, 4 BAHA Intenso, 21 BAHA Divino, 3 BAHA BP100, 4 Ponto, 2 Sophono, 5 Bonebridge, 5 BAHA5 Attract; 11 BAHA5 Connect were used in 12 unilateral COM; 16 bilateral COM; 3 unilateral cholesteatoma; 6 bilateral cholesteatoma; 2 unilateral otosclerosis; 5 bilateral otosclerosis; 9 congenital malformations; 6 major otoneurosurgical procedures; 5 sudden deafness. Explantation was necessary for five subjects. Middle ear pathology and sequels from surgery represent the most common reason for BCI implantation, both in unilateral and in bilateral cases. Transition from one implantable device to another one can be predictable, mostly when explantation is necessary. The role of BCI for rehabilitation in middle ear pathology may be extremely important.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The bone conductive implants (BCI) are nowadays a reliable alternative for rehabilitation of specific forms of hearing loss, i.e. conductive, mixed or single sided deafness (SSD). Aims/Objective: To analyse the various factors in play when considering an auditory rehabilitation with a bone-conductive device (BCI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
The clinical charts of subjects who underwent BCI application at the same Implanting Center from 2005 to 2018 were retrieved analysing also the reason for eventual explantation and the alternative option (transition) for hearing rehabilitation.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Nine BAHA Compact, 4 BAHA Intenso, 21 BAHA Divino, 3 BAHA BP100, 4 Ponto, 2 Sophono, 5 Bonebridge, 5 BAHA5 Attract; 11 BAHA5 Connect were used in 12 unilateral COM; 16 bilateral COM; 3 unilateral cholesteatoma; 6 bilateral cholesteatoma; 2 unilateral otosclerosis; 5 bilateral otosclerosis; 9 congenital malformations; 6 major otoneurosurgical procedures; 5 sudden deafness. Explantation was necessary for five subjects.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Middle ear pathology and sequels from surgery represent the most common reason for BCI implantation, both in unilateral and in bilateral cases. Transition from one implantable device to another one can be predictable, mostly when explantation is necessary.
SIGNIFICANCE
CONCLUSIONS
The role of BCI for rehabilitation in middle ear pathology may be extremely important.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30950673
doi: 10.1080/00016489.2019.1592220
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM