Removing arsenic from water by coprecipitation with iron: Effect of arsenic and iron concentrations and adsorbent incorporation.

Adsorption Arsenic Coprecipitation Granular activated carbon Water treatment

Journal

Chemosphere
ISSN: 1879-1298
Titre abrégé: Chemosphere
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0320657

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Historique:
received: 18 01 2019
revised: 19 03 2019
accepted: 22 03 2019
pubmed: 6 4 2019
medline: 22 6 2019
entrez: 6 4 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Arsenic (As) contamination of drinking water is a major cause of As toxicity in many parts of the world. A study was conducted to evaluate As removal from water containing 100-700 μg/L of As and As to Fe concentration ratios of 1:5-1:1000 using the coprecipitation process with and without As/Fe adsorption onto granular activated carbon (GAC). Fe concentration required to reduce As concentrations in order to achieve the WHO standard level of 10 μg/L increased exponentially with the increase in initial As concentration. When small amounts of GAC were added to the As/Fe solutions the Fe required to remove these As concentrations reduced drastically. This decline was due to the GAC adsorption of Fe and As, enhancing the removal of these metals through coprecipitation. Predictive regression equations were developed relating the GAC dose requirement to the initial As and Fe concentrations. Zeta potential data revealed that As was adsorbed on the GAC by outer-sphere complexation whereas Fe was adsorbed by inner-sphere complexation reversing the negative charge on GAC to positive values. X-ray diffraction of the GAC samples in the presence of Fe had an additional peak characteristic of ferrihydrite (Fe oxide) compared to that of the GAC sample without Fe. The study showed that incorporating an adsorbent into the coprecipitation process has the advantage of removing As from waters at all concentrations of Fe and As compared to coprecipitation alone which does not remove As to the required levels if Fe concentration is low.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30951937
pii: S0045-6535(19)30588-0
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.03.142
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Water Pollutants, Chemical 0
Iron E1UOL152H7
Arsenic N712M78A8G

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

431-438

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Tanjina Nur (T)

Faculty of Engineering, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), P.O. Box 123, Broadway, NSW, 2007, Australia.

Paripurnanda Loganathan (P)

Faculty of Engineering, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), P.O. Box 123, Broadway, NSW, 2007, Australia.

Mohammad Boshir Ahmed (MB)

Faculty of Engineering, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), P.O. Box 123, Broadway, NSW, 2007, Australia.

Md Abu Hasan Johir (MAH)

Faculty of Engineering, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), P.O. Box 123, Broadway, NSW, 2007, Australia.

Tien Vinh Nguyen (TV)

Faculty of Engineering, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), P.O. Box 123, Broadway, NSW, 2007, Australia.

Saravanamuthu Vigneswaran (S)

Faculty of Engineering, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), P.O. Box 123, Broadway, NSW, 2007, Australia. Electronic address: s.vigneswaran@uts.edu.au.

Articles similaires

Nigeria Environmental Monitoring Solid Waste Waste Disposal Facilities Refuse Disposal

Hydrochemical characterization and pCO

Kunarika Bhanot, M K Sharma, R D Kaushik
1.00
Rivers Environmental Monitoring Carbon Dioxide Water Pollutants, Chemical India
Wetlands Massachusetts Chlorides Groundwater Environmental Monitoring

Classifications MeSH