Withdrawal of infliximab therapy in ankylosing spondylitis in persistent clinical remission, results from the REMINEA study.
Adult
Antirheumatic Agents
/ therapeutic use
Cohort Studies
Female
HLA-B27 Antigen
/ analysis
Humans
Infliximab
/ therapeutic use
Male
Middle Aged
Recurrence
Remission Induction
Severity of Illness Index
Spondylitis, Ankylosing
/ drug therapy
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Withholding Treatment
Ankylosing spondylitis
Anti-TNF therapy
Disease activity
Treatment withdrawal
Journal
Arthritis research & therapy
ISSN: 1478-6362
Titre abrégé: Arthritis Res Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101154438
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 04 2019
05 04 2019
Historique:
received:
27
11
2018
accepted:
22
03
2019
entrez:
7
4
2019
pubmed:
7
4
2019
medline:
9
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Recent data suggest that anti-TNF doses can be reduced in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients. Some authors even propose withdrawing treatment in patients in clinical remission; however, at present there is no evidence to support this. To assess how long AS patients with persistent clinical remission remained free of flares after anti-TNF withdrawal and to evaluate the effects of treatment reintroduction. We also analyze the characteristics of patients who did not present clinical relapse. Multicenter, prospective, observational study of a cohort of patients with active AS who had received infliximab as a first anti-TNF treatment and who presented persistent remission (more than 6 months). We recorded at baseline and every 6-8 weeks over the 12-month period the age, gender, disease duration, peripheral arthritis or enthesitis, HLA-B27 status, BASDAI, CRP, ESR, BASFI, and three visual analogue scales, spine global pain, spinal night time pain, and patient's global assessment. Thirty-six out of 107 patients (34%) presented persistent remission and were included in our study. After treatment withdrawal, 21 of these 36 patients (58%) presented clinical relapse during follow-up. Infliximab therapy was reintroduced and only 52% achieved clinical remission, as they had before the discontinuation of infliximab; in an additional 10%, reintroduction of infliximab was ineffective, obliging us to change the anti-TNF therapy. No clinical or biological factors were associated with the occurrence of relapse during the follow-up. Two thirds of patients in clinical remission presented clinical relapse shortly after infliximab withdrawal. Although the reintroduction of infliximab treatment was safe, half of the patients did not present the same clinical response that they had achieved prior to treatment withdrawal.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Recent data suggest that anti-TNF doses can be reduced in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients. Some authors even propose withdrawing treatment in patients in clinical remission; however, at present there is no evidence to support this.
OBJECTIVE
To assess how long AS patients with persistent clinical remission remained free of flares after anti-TNF withdrawal and to evaluate the effects of treatment reintroduction. We also analyze the characteristics of patients who did not present clinical relapse.
METHODS
Multicenter, prospective, observational study of a cohort of patients with active AS who had received infliximab as a first anti-TNF treatment and who presented persistent remission (more than 6 months). We recorded at baseline and every 6-8 weeks over the 12-month period the age, gender, disease duration, peripheral arthritis or enthesitis, HLA-B27 status, BASDAI, CRP, ESR, BASFI, and three visual analogue scales, spine global pain, spinal night time pain, and patient's global assessment.
RESULTS
Thirty-six out of 107 patients (34%) presented persistent remission and were included in our study. After treatment withdrawal, 21 of these 36 patients (58%) presented clinical relapse during follow-up. Infliximab therapy was reintroduced and only 52% achieved clinical remission, as they had before the discontinuation of infliximab; in an additional 10%, reintroduction of infliximab was ineffective, obliging us to change the anti-TNF therapy. No clinical or biological factors were associated with the occurrence of relapse during the follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS
Two thirds of patients in clinical remission presented clinical relapse shortly after infliximab withdrawal. Although the reintroduction of infliximab treatment was safe, half of the patients did not present the same clinical response that they had achieved prior to treatment withdrawal.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30953541
doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1873-3
pii: 10.1186/s13075-019-1873-3
pmc: PMC6451276
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antirheumatic Agents
0
HLA-B27 Antigen
0
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
0
Infliximab
B72HH48FLU
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
88Investigateurs
Arturo Rodriguez-de-la-Serna
(A)
Victoria Hernandez
(V)
Elena Riera
(E)
Vera Ortiz
(V)
Teresa Clavaguera
(T)
Patricia Reyner
(P)
Miquel Sala
(M)
Agustí Sellas
(A)
Concepció Pitarch
(C)
Delia Reina
(D)
Jordi Blanco
(J)
Montse Centelles
(M)
Ramon Figuls
(R)
Mario Gelman
(M)
Xavier Arasa
(X)
Maria Bonet
(M)
Manel Ciria
(M)
Références
Clin Rheumatol. 2014 May;33(5):707-11
pubmed: 24062201
Lancet. 2018 Jul 14;392(10142):134-144
pubmed: 29961640
Reumatol Clin. 2005 Jun;1(1):32-7
pubmed: 21794234
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2006 Nov-Dec;24(6 Suppl 43):S-88-92
pubmed: 17083769
Clin Rheumatol. 2011 Jul;30(7):993-6
pubmed: 21373780
Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Aug;44(8):1876-86
pubmed: 11508441
Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Aug;65(8):2211-3
pubmed: 23686466
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2002 Nov;41(11):1280-5
pubmed: 12422001
J Rheumatol. 2015 Aug;42(8):1418-26
pubmed: 26077401
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015 Jul;54(7):1200-9
pubmed: 25526976
Arthritis Res Ther. 2005;7(3):R439-44
pubmed: 15899030
Lancet. 2017 Jul 1;390(10089):73-84
pubmed: 28110981
Heliyon. 2017 Nov 14;3(11):e00452
pubmed: 29264411
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2002 Nov-Dec;20(6 Suppl 28):S16-22
pubmed: 12463441
Arthritis Rheum. 2000 Jun;43(6):1346-52
pubmed: 10857793
J Rheumatol. 2007 Mar;34(3):510-5
pubmed: 17299842
Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Jan 8;21(1):11
pubmed: 30621746
Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Feb;52(2):582-91
pubmed: 15692973
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005 Mar;44(3):342-8
pubmed: 15561737
J Rheumatol. 2015 Jul;42(7):1177-85
pubmed: 26034151
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jun;76(6):978-991
pubmed: 28087505