Neurodevelopmental Outcomes after Intravitreal Bevacizumab Therapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity: A Prospective Case-Control Study.
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Bevacizumab
/ therapeutic use
Birth Weight
Brain
/ growth & development
Case-Control Studies
Child Development
/ physiology
Eye
/ growth & development
Female
Gestational Age
Humans
Infant
Infant, Premature
Intravitreal Injections
Male
Prospective Studies
Refraction, Ocular
/ physiology
Retinopathy of Prematurity
/ drug therapy
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Visual Acuity
/ physiology
Journal
Ophthalmology
ISSN: 1549-4713
Titre abrégé: Ophthalmology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7802443
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2019
11 2019
Historique:
received:
07
07
2018
revised:
29
03
2019
accepted:
29
03
2019
pubmed:
8
4
2019
medline:
14
3
2020
entrez:
8
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the neurodevelopmental and ocular developmental outcomes in premature children who have undergone intravitreal bevacizumab injection (IVB) for treatment of type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Prospective case-control study. We enrolled 3 groups of premature patients: premature children who had no history of ROP (group 0), premature children with history of ROP without treatment (group 1), and premature children with ROP who had received a single IVB (0.625 mg; group 2). Ocular developmental assessment, including cycloplegic refractometry, axial length, Cardiff acuity, and neurodevelopmental assessment via the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (Bayley III), were performed at 1 to 3 years of age and were compared between groups. Ocular developmental outcomes and Bayley III scores. A total of 148 patients (85 boys and 63 girls) were included. The mean age at assessment was 1.49±0.59 years. Group 0 patients demonstrated significantly higher gestational age (GA), birth weight, and Apgar scores compared with group 1 and 2 patients. There were no significant differences between groups 1 and 2 in demographics or systemic risk factors except for lower GA in group 2. The cylindrical power was significantly larger in groups 1 and 2 compared with group 0. The spherical equivalent was significantly more myopic and the Cardiff acuity was significantly poorer in group 2 than in group 0. There were no significant differences between groups 1 and 2 in refractive status, axial length, or Cardiff acuity. Neurodevelopmental assessment using Bayley III showed no significant difference among the 3 groups in any aspect after adjusting for GA and other systemic risk factors. The risks for poor neurodevelopmental outcomes also were not significantly different. At the mean age of 1.5 years, children with prior history of IVB (group 2) showed similar refractive and visual outcomes and similar neurodevelopmental outcomes compared with premature patients with ROP without requirement of treatment (group 1), although there is a possibility that a small but clinically significant difference may not have been detected in the current study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30954553
pii: S0161-6420(18)31799-8
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.03.048
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
0
VEGFA protein, human
0
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
0
Bevacizumab
2S9ZZM9Q9V
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1567-1577Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.