Endovascular Thrombectomy as a Means to Improve Survival in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis.
Journal
JAMA neurology
ISSN: 2168-6157
Titre abrégé: JAMA Neurol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101589536
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 07 2019
01 07 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
9
4
2019
medline:
19
6
2020
entrez:
9
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Although endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke is recommended by guidelines to improve functional recovery, thus far there are insufficient data on its association with mortality. To identify guideline-relevant trials of EVT vs medical therapy reporting 90-day mortality and perform a meta-analysis. All randomized clinical trials cited for recommendations on EVT vs medical therapy in the latest 2018 American Stroke Association/American Heart Association guidelines. Ten American Stroke Association/American Heart Association guideline-relevant randomized clinical trials of EVT vs medical therapy were selected for inclusion. Two EVT trials were excluded owing to infrequent use of EVT. Data were abstracted by 2 independent investigators and double-checked by 4 others. Singular study data were integrated using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method and a random-effects model to compute summary statistics of risk ratios (RR) with 95% CIs. Risk of 90-day mortality and 90-day intracranial hemorrhage was analyzed; sensitivity analyses were performed in early-window EVT trials (which included patients from the onset of symptoms onward) vs late-window EVT trials (which included patients from 6 hours after onset of symptoms onward). In 10 trials with 2313 patients, EVT significantly reduced the risk for 90-day mortality by 3.7% compared with medical therapy (15.0% vs 18.7%; RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.98; P = .03). Trends were similar in early-window (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.67-1.01; P = .06) and late-window trials only (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.41-1.40; P = .38). There was no difference in the risk for intracranial hemorrhage in EVT vs medical therapy (4.2% vs 4.0%; RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.71-1.72; P = .65). Limitations of the studies include trial protocol heterogeneity and bias originating from prematurely terminated trials. This meta-analysis of all evidence on EVT cited in the 2018 American Stroke Association/American Heart Association guidelines shows significant benefits for survival during the first 90 days after acute ischemic stroke compared with medical therapy alone.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30958530
pii: 2729689
doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.0525
pmc: PMC6583698
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
850-854Références
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2285-95
pubmed: 25882376
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 7;39(2):119-177
pubmed: 28886621
N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 22;378(8):708-718
pubmed: 29364767
Stroke. 2016 Sep;47(9):2331-8
pubmed: 27486173
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 1;372(1):11-20
pubmed: 25517348
N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 12;372(11):1009-18
pubmed: 25671797
N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 7;368(10):914-23
pubmed: 23394476
Lancet Neurol. 2018 Oct;17(10):895-904
pubmed: 30264728
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Oct;15(11):1138-47
pubmed: 27567239
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 4;378(1):11-21
pubmed: 29129157
Stroke. 2018 Mar;49(3):e46-e110
pubmed: 29367334
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2296-306
pubmed: 25882510
Lancet. 2016 Apr 23;387(10029):1723-31
pubmed: 26898852
N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 12;372(11):1019-30
pubmed: 25671798
N Engl J Med. 2017 Apr 6;376(14):1341-1349
pubmed: 28379802