Attentional bias and response inhibition in severe obesity with food disinhibition: a study of P300 and N200 event-related potential.
Journal
International journal of obesity (2005)
ISSN: 1476-5497
Titre abrégé: Int J Obes (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101256108
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2020
01 2020
Historique:
received:
22
09
2018
accepted:
24
02
2019
revised:
05
02
2019
pubmed:
11
4
2019
medline:
1
12
2020
entrez:
11
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In obesity there is growing evidence for common mechanism between food intake regulation and substance use disorders, especially more attentional bias and less cognitive control. In the present study we investigated whether severely obese subjects with or without disordered eating exhibit electroencephalographic (EEG) event-related potential (ERP) modifications as observed in substance abusers. A total of 90 women were included; 30 in the normal-weight (NW) group (18.5 < BMI < 24.5 kg/m The mean ± SD P300 amplitudes in Pz were significantly (p < 0.05) lower in ObFD- (12.4 ± 4.6) and ObFD+ (12.5 ± 4.4) groups than in the NW group (15.8 ± 5.9). The mean ± SD N200 amplitude in Cz was significantly lower in the ObFD- group (-2.0 ± 5.4) than in the NW group (-5.2 ± 4.2 vs; p = 0.035). N200 Cz amplitude was correlated with EDI-2 Binge eating risk score (ρ = 0.331; p = 0.01), EDI-2 Body Dissatisfaction score (ρ = 0.351; p = 0.007), and Drive for Thinness score (ρ = 0.26; p = 0.05). The present study provides evidence for reduction of P300 and N200 amplitude in obese women and that N200 amplitude may be related to more disordered eating and eating disorder risk. This leads to consider attentional bias and response inhibition as core mechanisms in obesity and as possible targets for new therapeutic strategy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE
In obesity there is growing evidence for common mechanism between food intake regulation and substance use disorders, especially more attentional bias and less cognitive control. In the present study we investigated whether severely obese subjects with or without disordered eating exhibit electroencephalographic (EEG) event-related potential (ERP) modifications as observed in substance abusers.
SUBJECTS/METHODS
A total of 90 women were included; 30 in the normal-weight (NW) group (18.5 < BMI < 24.5 kg/m
RESULTS
The mean ± SD P300 amplitudes in Pz were significantly (p < 0.05) lower in ObFD- (12.4 ± 4.6) and ObFD+ (12.5 ± 4.4) groups than in the NW group (15.8 ± 5.9). The mean ± SD N200 amplitude in Cz was significantly lower in the ObFD- group (-2.0 ± 5.4) than in the NW group (-5.2 ± 4.2 vs; p = 0.035). N200 Cz amplitude was correlated with EDI-2 Binge eating risk score (ρ = 0.331; p = 0.01), EDI-2 Body Dissatisfaction score (ρ = 0.351; p = 0.007), and Drive for Thinness score (ρ = 0.26; p = 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
The present study provides evidence for reduction of P300 and N200 amplitude in obese women and that N200 amplitude may be related to more disordered eating and eating disorder risk. This leads to consider attentional bias and response inhibition as core mechanisms in obesity and as possible targets for new therapeutic strategy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30967609
doi: 10.1038/s41366-019-0360-x
pii: 10.1038/s41366-019-0360-x
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
204-212Références
Wiss DA, Brewerton TD. Incorporating food addiction into disordered eating: the disordered eating food addiction nutrition guide (DEFANG). Eat Weight Disord EWD. 2017;22:49–59. https://doi.org/10/gddc4c
pubmed: 27943202
Stojek MMK, MacKillop J. Relative reinforcing value of food and delayed reward discounting in obesity and disordered eating: A systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2017;55:1–11. https://doi.org/10/gbjdzk
pubmed: 28478269
Volkow ND, Wise RA, Baler R. The dopamine motive system: implications for drug and food addiction. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017;18:741. https://doi.org/10/gcjxw8
pubmed: 29142296
Ziauddeen H, Alonso-Alonso M, Hill JO, Kelley M, Khan NA. Obesity and the Neurocognitive Basis of Food Reward and the Control of Intake12. Adv Nutr. 2015;6:474–86. https://doi.org/10/gddc4p
pubmed: 26178031
pmcid: 4496739
Kalivas PW, Volkow ND. The neural basis of addiction: a pathology of motivation and choice. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162:1403–13. https://doi.org/10/cb3rdc
pubmed: 16055761
Dawe S, Gullo MJ, Loxton NJ. Reward drive and rash impulsiveness as dimensions of impulsivity: implications for substance misuse. Addict Behav. 2004;29:1389–405. https://doi.org/10/dkk622
pubmed: 15345272
Lavagnino L, Arnone D, Cao B, Soares JC, Selvaraj S. Inhibitory control in obesity and binge eating disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of neurocognitive and neuroimaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;68:714–26. https://doi.org/10/f83n28
pubmed: 27381956
Giel KE, Teufel M, Junne F, Zipfel S, Schag K. Food-related impulsivity in obesity and binge eating disorder-a systematic update of the evidence. Nutrients. 2017;9. https://doi.org/10/gdh8pw.
Rochat L, Maurage P, Heeren A, Billieux J. Let’s open the decision-making umbrella: a framework for conceptualizing and assessing features of impaired decision making in addiction. Neuropsychol Rev. 2018. https://doi.org/10/gfrff6.
Booth C, Spronk D, Grol M, Fox E. Uncontrolled eating in adolescents: the role of impulsivity and automatic approach bias for food. Appetite. 2018;120:636–43. https://doi.org/10/gddph6
pubmed: 29066344
pmcid: 5689136
Mackey L, White MJ, Tyack Z, Finlayson G, Dalton M, King NA. A dual-process psychobiological model of temperament predicts liking and wanting for food and trait disinhibition. Appetite 2018. https://doi.org/10/gfrff3.
Brooks SJ, Lochner C, Shoptaw S, Stein DJ. Using the research domain criteria (RDoC) to conceptualize impulsivity and compulsivity in relation to addiction. Prog Brain Res. 2017;235:177–218. https://doi.org/10/gc8vgn
pubmed: 29054288
Motlagh F, Ibrahim F, Menke JM, Rashid R, Seghatoleslam T, Habil H. Neuroelectrophysiological approaches in heroin addiction research: a review of literatures. J Neurosci Res. 2016;94:297–309. https://doi.org/10/f78738
pubmed: 26748947
Campanella S, Pogarell O, Boutros N. Event-related potentials in substance use disorders: a narrative review based on articles from 1984 to 2012. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2014;45:67–76. https://doi.org/10/f55p3p
pubmed: 24104954
Luijten M, Machielsen MWJ, Veltman DJ, Hester R, de Haan L, Franken IHA. Systematic review of ERP and fMRI studies investigating inhibitory control and error processing in people with substance dependence and behavioural addictions. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2014;39:149–69. https://doi.org/10/f56dsr
pubmed: 24359877
pmcid: 3997601
Buzzell GA, Fedota JR, Roberts DM, McDonald CG. The N2 ERP component as an index of impaired cognitive control in smokers. Neurosci Lett. 2014;563:61–5. https://doi.org/10/gddc4j
pubmed: 24486891
Euser AS, Arends LR, Evans BE, Greaves-Lord K, Huizink AC, Franken IHA. The P300 event-related brain potential as a neurobiological endophenotype for substance use disorders: a meta-analytic investigation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012;36:572–603. https://doi.org/10/cfcnn9
pubmed: 21964481
Polich J. Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;118:2128–48. https://doi.org/10/hmf
pubmed: 17573239
pmcid: 2715154
Littel M, Euser AS, Munafò MR, Franken IHA. Electrophysiological indices of biased cognitive processing of substance-related cues: a meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012;36:1803–16. https://doi.org/10/f39g5k
pubmed: 22613258
Hill SY, O’Brien J. Psychological and neurobiological precursors of alcohol use disorders in high risk youth. Curr Addict Rep. 2015;2:104–13. https://doi.org/10/gddc4k.
pubmed: 26301172
pmcid: 4540406
Balconi M, Venturella I, Finocchiaro R. Evidences from rewarding system, FRN and P300 effect in internet-addiction in young people. SHORT TITLE: Rewarding system and EEG in internet-addiction. Brain Sci. 2017;7. https://doi.org/10/gddc4n.
Fielding A, Fu Y, Franz EA. The Brain’s reward response occurs even without actual reward! J Gambl Stud. 2017:1–15. https://doi.org/10/gddc4m.
Pires L, Leitão J, Guerrini C, Simões MR. Event-related brain potentials in the study of inhibition: cognitive control, source localization and age-related modulations. Neuropsychol Rev. 2014;24:461–90. https://doi.org/10/gddc4d
pubmed: 25407470
Kok A, Ramautar JR, De Ruiter MB, Band GPH, Ridderinkhof KR. ERP components associated with successful and unsuccessful stopping in a stop-signal task. Psychophysiology. 2004;41:9–20. https://doi.org/10/dzz6nw
pubmed: 14692996
Larson MJ, Clayson PE, Clawson A. Making sense of all the conflict: a theoretical review and critique of conflict-related ERPs. Int J Psychophysiol. 2014;93:283–97. https://doi.org/10/f6gvhj
pubmed: 24950132
Franken IHA, Luijten M, van der Veen FM, van Strien JW. Cognitive control in young heavy drinkers: an ERP study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;175:77–83. https://doi.org/10/gbgkg8
pubmed: 28410524
Babiloni C, Del Percio C, Valenzano A, Marzano N, De Rosas M, Petito A, et al. Frontal attentional responses to food size are abnormal in obese subjects: an electroencephalographic study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120:1441–8. https://doi.org/10/fn6cph
pubmed: 19616997
Tascilar ME, Turkkahraman D, Oz O, Yucel M, Taskesen M, Eker I, et al. P300 auditory event-related potentials in children with obesity: is childhood obesity related to impairment in cognitive functions? Pediatr Diabetes. 2011;12:589–95. https://doi.org/10/cbvn5x
pubmed: 21418454
Reyes S, Peirano P, Peigneux P, Lozoff B, Algarin C. Inhibitory control in otherwise healthy overweight 10-year-old children. Int J Obes 2005. 2015;39:1230–5. https://doi.org/10/f7rdhj
Nijs IMT, Muris P, Euser AS, Franken IHA. Differences in attention to food and food intake between overweight/obese and normal-weight females under conditions of hunger and satiety. Appetite. 2010;54:243–54. https://doi.org/10/bxpcqf
pubmed: 19922752
Carbine KA, Duraccio KM, Kirwan CB, Muncy NM, LeCheminant JD, Larson MJ. A direct comparison between ERP and fMRI measurements of food-related inhibitory control: Implications for BMI status and dietary intake. Neuroimage. 2018;166:335–48. https://doi.org/10/gcrsnb
pubmed: 29113942
Hume DJ, Howells FM, Rauch HGL, Kroff J, Lambert EV. Electrophysiological indices of visual food cue-reactivity. Differences in obese, overweight and normal weight women. Appetite. 2015;85:126–37. https://doi.org/10/gddc4f.
pubmed: 25464021
Mustelin L, Kärkkäinen U, Kaprio J, Keski-Rahkonen A. The Eating Disorder Inventory in the screening for DSM-5 binge eating disorder. Eat Behav. 2016;22:145–8. https://doi.org/10/f83jsj
pubmed: 27289520
Finlayson G. Food addiction and obesity: unnecessary medicalization of hedonic overeating. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2017;13:493–8. https://doi.org/10/f99dqx
pubmed: 28549063
Luijten M, Machielsen MWJ, Veltman DJ, Hester R, de Haan L, Franken IHA. Systematic review of ERP and fMRI studies investigating inhibitory control and error processing in people with substance dependence and behavioural addictions. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2014;39:149–69. https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.130052
pubmed: 24359877
pmcid: 3997601
Kaiser S, Weiss O, Hill H, Markela-Lerenc J, Kiefer M, Weisbrod M. N2 event-related potential correlates of response inhibition in an auditory Go/Nogo task. Int J Psychophysiol. 2006;61:279–82. https://doi.org/10/c7h8fn
pubmed: 16298004
Falkenstein M. Inhibition, conflict and the Nogo-N2. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117:1638–40. https://doi.org/10/fj6z4p
pubmed: 16798078
Nieuwenhuis S, Yeung N, van den Wildenberg W, Ridderinkhof KR. Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2003;3:17–26.
pubmed: 12822595
Chen S, Jia Y, Woltering S. Neural differences of inhibitory control between adolescents with obesity and their peers. Int J Obes. 2018. https://doi.org/10/gdsg7n.
Villarejo C, Jiménez-Murcia S, Álvarez-Moya E, Granero R, Penelo E, Treasure J, et al. Loss of control over eating: a description of the eating disorder/obesity spectrum in women. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2014;22:25–31. https://doi.org/10/f5kpdp
pubmed: 24338827
Arns M, Drinkenburg W, Leon Kenemans J. The effects of QEEG-informed neurofeedback in ADHD: an open-label pilot study. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2012;37:171–80. https://doi.org/10/f37r44
pubmed: 22446998
pmcid: 3419351
Sokhadze TM, Cannon RL, Trudeau DL. EEG biofeedback as a treatment for substance use disorders: review, rating of efficacy, and recommendations for further research. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2008;33:1–28. https://doi.org/10/c8j3dq
pubmed: 18214670
pmcid: 2259255
Cespón J, Rodella C, Rossini PM, Miniussi C, Pellicciari MC. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation promotes frontal compensatory mechanisms in healthy elderly subjects. Front Aging Neurosci. 2017;9:420. https://doi.org/10/gdsmxk
pubmed: 29326582
pmcid: 5741680
Izzidien A, Ramaraju S, Roula MA, McCarthy PW. Effect of anodal-tDCS on event-related potentials: a controlled study. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:1584947. https://doi.org/10/f9ggtp
pubmed: 27957487
pmcid: 5121578
Bersani G, Marconi D, Limpido L, Tarolla E, Caroti E. Pilot study of light therapy and neurocognitive performance of attention and memory in healthy subjects. Psychol Rep. 2008;102:299–304. https://doi.org/10/cqnjbf
pubmed: 18481690
Lapenta OM, Sierve KD, de Macedo EC, Fregni F, Boggio PS. Transcranial direct current stimulation modulates ERP-indexed inhibitory control and reduces food consumption. Appetite. 2014;83:42–8. https://doi.org/10/f6qjrm
pubmed: 25128836
Eichen DM, Matheson BE, Appleton-Knapp SL, Boutelle KN. Neurocognitive treatments for eating disorders and obesity. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2017;19:62. https://doi.org/10/gbtnbt
pubmed: 28744627
pmcid: 5669379
Pompili A, Arnone B, D’Amico M, Federico P, Gasbarri A. Evidence of estrogen modulation on memory processes for emotional content in healthy young women. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2016;65:94–101. https://doi.org/10/gd52d4.
pubmed: 26731574