Pathogenic mutations in neurofibromin identifies a leucine-rich domain regulating glioma cell invasiveness.
Journal
Oncogene
ISSN: 1476-5594
Titre abrégé: Oncogene
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8711562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2019
07 2019
Historique:
received:
24
07
2018
accepted:
23
03
2019
revised:
14
03
2019
pubmed:
11
4
2019
medline:
15
2
2020
entrez:
11
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive tumor of the brain. NF1, a tumor suppressor gene and RAS-GTPase, is one of the highly mutated genes in GBM. Dysregulated NF1 expression promotes cell invasion, proliferation, and tumorigenesis. Loss of NF1 expression in glioblastoma is associated with increased aggressiveness of the tumor. Here, we show that NF1-loss in patient-derived glioma cells using shRNA increases self-renewal, heightens cell invasion, and promotes mesenchymal subtype and epithelial mesenchymal transition-specific gene expression that enhances tumorigenesis. The neurofibromin protein contains at least four major domains, with the GAP-related domain being the most well-studied. In this study, we report that the leucine-rich domain (LRD) of neurofibromin inhibits invasion of human glioblastoma cells without affecting their proliferation. Moreover, under conditions tested, the NF1-LRD fails to hydrolyze Ras-GTP to Ras-GDP, suggesting that its suppressive function is independent of Ras signaling. We further demonstrate that rare variants within the NF1-LRD domain found in a subset of the patients are pathogenic and reduce NF1-LRD's invasion suppressive function. Taken together, our results show, for the first time, that NF1-LRD inhibits glioma invasion, and provides evidence of a previously unrecognized function of NF1-LRD in glioma biology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30967630
doi: 10.1038/s41388-019-0809-3
pii: 10.1038/s41388-019-0809-3
pmc: PMC6755990
doi:
Substances chimiques
NF1 protein, human
0
Neurofibromin 1
0
Leucine
GMW67QNF9C
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5367-5380Références
Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:987–96.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043330
Johnson DR, O’Neill BP. Glioblastoma survival in the United States before and during the temozolomide era. J Neurooncol. 2012;107:359–64.
doi: 10.1007/s11060-011-0749-4
Verhaak RG, Hoadley KA, Purdom E, Wang V, Qi Y, Wilkerson MD, et al. Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1. Cancer Cell. 2010;17:98–110.
doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.020
Phillips HS, Kharbanda S, Chen R, Forrest WF, Soriano RH, Wu TD, et al. Molecular subclasses of high-grade glioma predict prognosis, delineate a pattern of disease progression, and resemble stages in neurogenesis. Cancer Cell. 2006;9:157–73.
doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.02.019
Parsons DW, Jones S, Zhang X, Lin JC, Leary RJ, Angenendt P, et al. An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science. 2008;321:1807–12.
doi: 10.1126/science.1164382
McGillicuddy LT, Fromm JA, Hollstein PE, Kubek S, Beroukhim R, De Raedt T, et al. Proteasomal and genetic inactivation of the NF1 tumor suppressor in gliomagenesis. Cancer Cell. 2009;16:44–54.
doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.05.009
The I, Murthy AE, Hannigan GE, Jacoby LB, Menon AG, Gusella JF, et al. Neurofibromatosis type 1 gene mutations in neuroblastoma. Nat Genet. 1993;3:62–6.
doi: 10.1038/ng0193-62
Maertens O, Johnson B, Hollstein P, Frederick DT, Cooper ZA, Messiaen L, et al. Elucidating distinct roles for NF1 in melanomagenesis. Cancer Discov. 2013;3:338–49.
doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0313
Ding L, Getz G, Wheeler DA, Mardis ER, McLellan MD, Cibulskis K, et al. Somatic mutations affect key pathways in lung adenocarcinoma. Nature. 2008;455:1069–75.
doi: 10.1038/nature07423
Cancer Genome Atlas Research N. Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature. 2008;455:1061–8.
doi: 10.1038/nature07385
Cerami E, Gao J, Dogrusoz U, Gross BE, Sumer SO, Aksoy BA, et al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:401–4.
doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0095
Gao J, Aksoy BA, Dogrusoz U, Dresdner G, Gross B, Sumer SO, et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci Signal. 2013;6:pl1.
doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2004088
Herting CJ, Chen Z, Pitter KL, Szulzewsky F, Kaffes I, Kaluzova M, et al. Genetic driver mutations define the expression signature and microenvironmental composition of high-grade gliomas. Glia. 2017;65:1914–26.
doi: 10.1002/glia.23203
Ozawa T, Riester M, Cheng YK, Huse JT, Squatrito M, Helmy K, et al. Most human non-GCIMP glioblastoma subtypes evolve from a common proneural-like precursor glioma. Cancer Cell. 2014;26:288–300.
doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.06.005
Alcantara Llaguno SR, Wang Z, Sun D, Chen J, Xu J, Kim E, et al. Adult lineage-restricted CNS progenitors specify distinct glioblastoma subtypes. Cancer Cell. 2015;28:429–40.
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.09.007
Chow RD, Guzman CD, Wang G, Schmidt F, Youngblood MW, Ye L, et al. AAV-mediated direct in vivo CRISPR screen identifies functional suppressors in glioblastoma. Nat Neurosci. 2017;20:1329–41.
doi: 10.1038/nn.4620
Sintupisut N, Liu PL, Yeang CH. An integrative characterization of recurrent molecular aberrations in glioblastoma genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:8803–21.
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt656
Cichowski K, Jacks T. NF1 tumor suppressor gene function: narrowing the GAP. Cell. 2001;104:593–604.
doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00245-8
Zhu Y, Parada LF. Neurofibromin, a tumor suppressor in the nervous system. Exp Cell Res. 2001;264:19–28.
doi: 10.1006/excr.2000.5138
Arima Y, Hayashi H, Kamata K, Goto TM, Sasaki M, Kuramochi A, et al. Decreased expression of neurofibromin contributes to epithelial-mesenchymal transition in neurofibromatosis type 1. Exp Dermatol. 2010;19:e136–41.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2009.01017.x
Miller SJ, Rangwala F, Williams J, Ackerman P, Kong S, Jegga AG, et al. Large-scale molecular comparison of human schwann cells to malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor cell lines and tissues. Cancer Res. 2006;66:2584–91.
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3330
Vallee B, Doudeau M, Godin F, Gombault A, Tchalikian A, de Tauzia ML, et al. Nf1 RasGAP inhibition of LIMK2 mediates a new cross-talk between Ras and Rho pathways. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e47283.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047283
Whittaker SR, Theurillat JP, Van Allen E, Wagle N, Hsiao J, Cowley GS, et al. A genome-scale RNA interference screen implicates NF1 loss in resistance to RAF inhibition. Cancer Discov. 2013;3:350–62.
doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0470
Nissan MH, Pratilas CA, Jones AM, Ramirez R, Won H, Liu C, et al. Loss of NF1 in cutaneous melanoma is associated with RAS activation and MEK dependence. Cancer Res. 2014;74:2340–50.
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2625
Mendes-Pereira AM, Sims D, Dexter T, Fenwick K, Assiotis I, Kozarewa I, et al. Genome-wide functional screen identifies a compendium of genes affecting sensitivity to tamoxifen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109(8):2730–5.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1018872108
Holzel M, Huang S, Koster J, Ora I, Lakeman A, Caron H, et al. NF1 is a tumor suppressor in neuroblastoma that determines retinoic acid response and disease outcome. Cell. 2010;142:218–29.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.004
de Bruin EC, Cowell C, Warne PH, Jiang M, Saunders RE, Melnick MA, et al. Reduced NF1 expression confers resistance to EGFR inhibition in lung cancer. Cancer Discov. 2014;4:606–19.
doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0741
Guo J, Grovola MR, Xie H, Coggins GE, Duggan P, Hasan R, et al. Comprehensive pharmacological profiling of neurofibromatosis cell lines. Am J Cancer Res. 2017;7:923–34.
pubmed: 28469964
pmcid: 5411799
Ambrosini G, Cheema HS, Seelman S, Teed A, Sambol EB, Singer S, et al. Sorafenib inhibits growth and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling in malignant peripheral nerve sheath cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2008;7:890–6.
doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-07-0518
Dodd RD, Mito JK, Eward WC, Chitalia R, Sachdeva M, Ma Y, et al. NF1 deletion generates multiple subtypes of soft-tissue sarcoma that respond to MEK inhibition. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013;12:1906–17.
doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0189
Maki RG, D’Adamo DR, Keohan ML, Saulle M, Schuetze SM, Undevia SD, et al. Phase II study of sorafenib in patients with metastatic or recurrent sarcomas. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:3133–40.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.4495
Dombi E, Baldwin A, Marcus LJ, Fisher MJ, Weiss B, Kim A, et al. Activity of selumetinib in neurofibromatosis type 1-related plexiform neurofibromas. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:2550–60.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1605943
Kahen EJ, Brohl A, Yu D, Welch D, Cubitt CL, Lee JK, et al. Neurofibromin level directs RAS pathway signaling and mediates sensitivity to targeted agents in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Oncotarget. 2018;9:22571–85.
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.25181
Hsueh YP. From neurodevelopment to neurodegeneration: the interaction of neurofibromin and valosin-containing protein/p97 in regulation of dendritic spine formation. J Biomed Sci. 2012;19:33.
doi: 10.1186/1423-0127-19-33
Tokuo H, Yunoue S, Feng L, Kimoto M, Tsuji H, Ono T, et al. Phosphorylation of neurofibromin by cAMP-dependent protein kinase is regulated via a cellular association of N
doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(01)02309-2
Stowe IB, Mercado EL, Stowe TR, Bell EL, Oses-Prieto JA, Hernandez H, et al. A shared molecular mechanism underlies the human rasopathies Legius syndrome and neurofibromatosis-1. Genes Dev. 2012;26:1421–6.
doi: 10.1101/gad.190876.112
Feng L, Yunoue S, Tokuo H, Ozawa T, Zhang D, Patrakitkomjom S, et al. PKA phosphorylation and 14-3-3 interaction regulate the function of neurofibromatosis type 1 tumor suppressor, neurofibromin. FEBS Lett. 2004;557:275–82.
doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(03)01507-2
Patrakitkomjom S, Kobayashi D, Morikawa T, Wilson MM, Tsubota N, Irie A, et al. Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) tumor suppressor, neurofibromin, regulates the neuronal differentiation of PC12 cells via its associating protein, CRMP-2. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:9399–413.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M708206200
Lin Y-L, Lei Y-T, Hong C-J, Hsueh YP. Syndecan-2 induces filopodia formation via the neurofibromin-PKA-Ena/VASP pathway. J Cell Biol. 2007;177:829–41.
doi: 10.1083/jcb.200608121
Kweh F, Zheng M, Kurenova E, Wallace M, Golubovskaya V, Cance WG. Neurofibromin physically interacts with the N-terminal domain of focal adhesion kinase. Mol Carcinog. 2009;48:1005–17.
doi: 10.1002/mc.20552
Wang HF, Shih YT, Chen CY, Chao HW, Lee MJ, Hsueh YP. Valosin-containing protein and neurofibromin interact to regulate dendritic spine density. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:4820–37.
doi: 10.1172/JCI45677
Welti S, Fraterman S, D’Angelo I, Wilm M, Scheffzek K. The sec14 homology module of neurofibromin binds cellular glycerophospholipids: mass spectrometry and structure of a lipid complex. J Mol Biol. 2007;366:551–62.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.11.055
D’Angelo I, Welti S, Bonneau F, Scheffzek K. A novel bipartite phospholipid-binding module in the neurofibromatosis type 1 protein. EMBO Rep. 2006;7:174–9.
doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400602
Brennan C, Momota H, Hambardzumyan D, Ozawa T, Tandon A, Pedraza A, et al. Glioblastoma subclasses can be defined by activity among signal transduction pathways and associated genomic alterations. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e7752.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007752
Alcantara Llaguno S, Chen J, Kwon CH, Jackson EL, Li Y, Burns DK, et al. Malignant astrocytomas originate from neural stem/progenitor cells in a somatic tumor suppressor mouse model. Cancer Cell. 2009;15:45–56.
doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.12.006
Joseph NM, Mosher JT, Buchstaller J, Snider P, McKeever PE, Lim M, et al. The loss of Nf1 transiently promotes self-renewal but not tumorigenesis by neural crest stem cells. Cancer Cell. 2008;13:129–40.
doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.01.003
Chong YK, Toh TB, Zaiden N, Poonepalli A, Leong SH, Ong CE, et al. Cryopreservation of neurospheres derived from human glioblastoma multiforme. Stem Cells. 2009;27:29–39.
doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2008-0009
Foong CS, Ng FS, Phong M, Toh TB, Chong YK, Tucker-Kellogg G, et al. Cryopreservation of cancer-initiating cells derived from glioblastoma. Front Biosci. 2011;3:698–708.
Koh LW, Koh GR, Ng FS, Toh TB, Sandanaraj E, Chong YK, et al. A distinct reactive oxygen species profile confers chemoresistance in glioma-propagating cells and associates with patient survival outcome. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2013;19:2261–79.
doi: 10.1089/ars.2012.4999
Ng FS, Toh TB, Ting EH, Koh GR, Sandanaraj E, Phong M, et al. Progenitor-like traits contribute to patient survival and prognosis in oligodendroglial tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:4122–35.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-3064
Berezovsky AD, Poisson LM, Cherba D, Webb CP, Transou AD, Lemke NW, et al. Sox2 promotes malignancy in glioblastoma by regulating plasticity and astrocytic differentiation. Neoplasia. 2014;16:193–206. 206 e119–125
doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2014.03.006
Lee JK, Joo KM, Lee J, Yoon Y, Nam DH. Targeting the epithelial to mesenchymal transition in glioblastoma: the emerging role of MET signaling. OncoTargets Ther. 2014;7:1933–44.
Brown DV, Daniel PM, D’Abaco GM, Gogos A, Ng W, Morokoff AP, et al. Coexpression analysis of CD133 and CD44 identifies proneural and mesenchymal subtypes of glioblastoma multiforme. Oncotarget. 2015;6:6267–80.
pubmed: 25749043
pmcid: 4467436
Ratner N, Miller SJ. A RASopathy gene commonly mutated in cancer: the neurofibromatosis type 1 tumour suppressor. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15:290–301.
doi: 10.1038/nrc3911
Bayo P, Jou A, Stenzinger A, Shao C, Gross M, Jensen A, et al. Loss of SOX2 expression induces cell motility via vimentin up-regulation and is an unfavorable risk factor for survival of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Oncol. 2015;9:1704–19.
doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2015.05.006
Qian Y, Corum L, Meng Q, Blenis J, Zheng JZ, Shi X, et al. PI3K induced actin filament remodeling through Akt and p70S6K1: implication of essential role in cell migration. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2004;286:C153–63.
doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00142.2003
Kim D, Kim S, Koh H, Yoon SO, Chung AS, Cho KS, et al. Akt/PKB promotes cancer cell invasion via increased motility and metalloproteinase production. FASEB J. 2001;15:1953–62.
doi: 10.1096/fj.01-0198com
Wang KZ, Wara-Aswapati N, Boch JA, Yoshida Y, Hu CD, Galson DL, et al. TRAF6 activation of PI 3-kinase-dependent cytoskeletal changes is cooperative with Ras and is mediated by an interaction with cytoplasmic Src. J Cell Sci. 2006;119:1579–91.
doi: 10.1242/jcs.02889
Fortier AM, Asselin E, Cadrin M. Keratin 8 and 18 loss in epithelial cancer cells increases collective cell migration and cisplatin sensitivity through claudin1 up-regulation. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:11555–71.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.428920
Yamaguchi N, Mizutani T, Kawabata K, Haga H. Leader cells regulate collective cell migration via Rac activation in the downstream signaling of integrin beta1 and PI3K. Sci Rep. 2015;5:7656.
doi: 10.1038/srep07656
Scita G, Tenca P, Frittoli E, Tocchetti A, Innocenti M, Giardina G, et al. Signaling from Ras to Rac and beyond: not just a matter of GEFs. EMBO J. 2000;19:2393–8.
doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.11.2393
Kwiatkowska A, Kijewska M, Lipko M, Hibner U, Kaminska B. Downregulation of Akt and FAK phosphorylation reduces invasion of glioblastoma cells by impairment of MT1-MMP shuttling to lamellipodia and downregulates MMPs expression. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1813:655–67.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.01.020
Pu P, Kang C, Li J, Jiang H, Cheng J. The effects of antisense AKT2 RNA on the inhibition of malignant glioma cell growth in vitro and in vivo. J Neurooncol. 2006;76:1–11.
doi: 10.1007/s11060-005-3029-3
Cheng GZ, Zhang W, Wang LH. Regulation of cancer cell survival, migration, and invasion by Twist: AKT2 comes to interplay. Cancer Res. 2008;68:957–60.
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5067
Sherry ST, Ward MH, Kholodov M, Baker J, Phan L, Smigielski EM, et al. dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:308–11.
doi: 10.1093/nar/29.1.308
Boissan M, De Wever O, Lizarraga F, Wendum D, Poincloux R, Chignard N, et al. Implication of metastasis suppressor NM23-H1 in maintaining adherens junctions and limiting the invasive potential of human cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2010;70:7710–22.
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1887
Larue L, Bellacosa A. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in development and cancer: role of phosphatidylinositol 3’ kinase/AKT pathways. Oncogene. 2005;24:7443–54.
doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209091
Elston MS, Gill AJ, Conaglen JV, Clarkson A, Cook RJ, Little NS, et al. Nuclear accumulation of e-cadherin correlates with loss of cytoplasmic membrane staining and invasion in pituitary adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:1436–42.
doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-2075
Holen I, Whitworth J, Nutter F, Evans A, Brown HK, Lefley DV, et al. Loss of plakoglobin promotes decreased cell-cell contact, increased invasion, and breast cancer cell dissemination in vivo. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:R86.
doi: 10.1186/bcr3201
Scheffzek K, Welti S. Pleckstrin homology (PH) like domains - versatile modules in protein-protein interaction platforms. FEBS Lett. 2012;586:2662–73.
doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.06.006
Bonneau F, Lenherr ED, Pena V, Hart DJ, Scheffzek K. Solubility survey of fragments of the neurofibromatosis type 1 protein neurofibromin. Protein Expr Purif. 2009;65:30–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2008.12.001
Cui Y, Morrison H. Construction of cloning-friendly mini-genes for mammalian expression of full-length human NF1 isoforms. Hum Mutat. 2018;40:187–92.
doi: 10.1002/humu.23681
Ho IA, Chan KY, Ng WH, Guo CM, Hui KM, Cheang P, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase 1 is necessary for the migration of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells toward human glioma. Stem Cells. 2009;27:1366–75.
doi: 10.1002/stem.50
Tuominen VJ, Ruotoistenmaki S, Viitanen A, Jumppanen M, Isola J. ImmunoRatio: a publicly available web application for quantitative image analysis of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and Ki-67. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12:R56.
doi: 10.1186/bcr2615
Yulyana Y, Endaya BB, Ng WH, Guo CM, Hui KM, Lam PY, et al. Carbenoxolone enhances TRAIL-induced apoptosis through the upregulation of death receptor 5 and inhibition of gap junction intercellular communication in human glioma. Stem Cells Dev. 2013;22:1870–82.
doi: 10.1089/scd.2012.0529