Spectrotemporal modulation provides a unifying framework for auditory cortical asymmetries.


Journal

Nature human behaviour
ISSN: 2397-3374
Titre abrégé: Nat Hum Behav
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101697750

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2019
Historique:
received: 03 05 2018
accepted: 28 01 2019
entrez: 12 4 2019
pubmed: 12 4 2019
medline: 23 11 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The principles underlying functional asymmetries in cortex remain debated. For example, it is accepted that speech is processed bilaterally in auditory cortex, but a left hemisphere dominance emerges when the input is interpreted linguistically. The mechanisms, however, are contested, such as what sound features or processing principles underlie laterality. Recent findings across species (humans, canines and bats) provide converging evidence that spectrotemporal sound features drive asymmetrical responses. Typically, accounts invoke models wherein the hemispheres differ in time-frequency resolution or integration window size. We develop a framework that builds on and unifies prevailing models, using spectrotemporal modulation space. Using signal processing techniques motivated by neural responses, we test this approach, employing behavioural and neurophysiological measures. We show how psychophysical judgements align with spectrotemporal modulations and then characterize the neural sensitivities to temporal and spectral modulations. We demonstrate differential contributions from both hemispheres, with a left lateralization for temporal modulations and a weaker right lateralization for spectral modulations. We argue that representations in the modulation domain provide a more mechanistic basis to account for lateralization in auditory cortex.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30971792
doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0548-z
pii: 10.1038/s41562-019-0548-z
pmc: PMC6650286
mid: NIHMS1519835
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

393-405

Subventions

Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : F32 DC011985
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R01 DC005660
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R21 MH114166
Pays : United States

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Références

Broca, P. Remarques sur le siege de la faculté du langage articulé, suivies d’une observation d’aphémie (perte de la parole). Bull. et mémoires de la Société Anatomique de Paris 36, 330–356 (1861).
Wernicke, C. Der aphasische Symptomencomplex; eine psychologische Studie auf anatomischer Basis (Cohn & Weigert, Breslau, 1874).
Hickok, G. & Poeppel, D. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8, 393–402 (2007).
pubmed: 17431404 doi: 10.1038/nrn2113
Hagoort, P. & Indefrey, P. The neurobiology of language beyond single words. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 37, 347–362 (2014).
pubmed: 24905595 doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-013847
Friederici, A. D. The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function. Physiol. Rev. 91, 1357–1392 (2011).
pubmed: 22013214 doi: 10.1152/physrev.00006.2011
Rauschecker, J. P. & Scott, S. K. Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: nonhuman primates illuminate human speech processing. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 718–724 (2009).
pubmed: 19471271 pmcid: 2846110 doi: 10.1038/nn.2331
Price, C. J. A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading. NeuroImage 62, 816–847 (2012).
pubmed: 22584224 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.062
Goetz, C. G. Textbook of Clinical Neurology 3rd edn, 355 (2007).
Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., Jessell, T. M. Principles of Neural Science 4th edn, 457–469 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2000).
Bozic, M., Tyler, L. K., Ives, D. T., Randall, B. & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. Bihemispheric foundations for human speech comprehension. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 17439–17444 (2010).
pubmed: 20855587 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000531107 pmcid: 2951426
Overath, T., McDermott, J. H., Zarate, J. M. & Poeppel, D. The cortical analysis of speech-specific temporal structure revealed by responses to sound quilts. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 903–911 (2015).
pubmed: 25984889 pmcid: 4769593 doi: 10.1038/nn.4021
Zatorre, R. J. & Gandour, J. T. Neural specializations for speech and pitch: moving beyond the dichotomies. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 363, 1087–1104 (2008).
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2161
McGettigan, C. & Scott, S. K. Cortical asymmetries in speech perception: what’s wrong, what’s right and what’s left? Trends Cognit. Sci. 16, 269–276 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.006
Efron, R. Temporal perception, aphasia and déjà vu. Brain 86, 403–424 (1963).
pubmed: 14063892 doi: 10.1093/brain/86.3.403
Schwartz, J. & Tallal, P. Rate of acoustic change may underlie hemispheric specialization for speech perception. Science 207, 1380–1381 (1980).
pubmed: 7355297 doi: 10.1126/science.7355297
Tallal, P. & Piercy, M. Defects of non-verbal auditory perception in children with developmental aphasia. Nature 241, 468–469 (1973).
pubmed: 4705758 doi: 10.1038/241468a0
Ross, E. D. & Mesulam, M.-M. Dominant language functions of the right hemisphere? Prosody and emotional gesturing. Arch. Neurol. 36, 144–148 (1979).
pubmed: 435134 doi: 10.1001/archneur.1979.00500390062006
Tucker, D. M., Watson, R. T. & Heilman, K. M. Discrimination and evocation of affectively intoned speech in patients with right parietal disease. Neurol. 27, 947–947 (1977).
doi: 10.1212/WNL.27.10.947
Robin, D. A., Tranel, D. & Damasio, H. Auditory perception of temporal and spectral events in patients with focal left and right cerebral lesions. Brain Lang. 39, 539–555 (1990).
pubmed: 2076495 doi: 10.1016/0093-934X(90)90161-9
Zatorre, R. J. Pitch perception of complex tones and human temporal-lobe function. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84, 566–572 (1988).
pubmed: 3170948 doi: 10.1121/1.396834
Zatorre, R. J., Evans, A. C., Meyer, E. & Gjedde, A. Lateralization of phonetic and pitch discrimination in speech processing. Science 256, 846–849 (1992).
pubmed: 1589767 doi: 10.1126/science.256.5058.846
Belin, P. et al. Lateralization of speech and auditory temporal processing. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 10, 536–540 (1998).
pubmed: 9712682 doi: 10.1162/089892998562834
Zatorre, R. J., Belin, P. & Penhune, V. B. Structure and function of auditory cortex: music and speech. Trends Cognit. Sci. 6, 37–46 (2002).
doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01816-7
Poeppel, D. The analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: cerebral lateralization as ‘asymmetric sampling in time’. Speech Commun. 41, 245–255 (2003).
doi: 10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00107-3
Scott, S. K. & McGettigan, C. Do temporal processes underlie left hemisphere dominance in speech perception? Brain Lang. 127, 36–45 (2013).
pubmed: 24125574 pmcid: 4083253 doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.07.006
Gervain, J. Near-infrared spectroscopy: recent advances in infant speech perception and language acquisition research. Front. Psychol. 5, 481 (2014).
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00916
Luo, H. & Poeppel, D. Cortical oscillations in auditory perception and speech: evidence for two temporal windows in human auditory cortex. Front. Psychol. 3, 170 (2012).
pubmed: 22666214 pmcid: 3364513 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00170
Okamoto, H. & Kakigi, R. Hemispheric asymmetry of auditory mismatch negativity elicited by spectral and temporal deviants: a magnetoencephalographic study. Brain Topogr. 28, 471–478 (2015).
pubmed: 24366694 doi: 10.1007/s10548-013-0347-1
Thompson, E. C. et al. Hemispheric asymmetry of endogenous neural oscillations in young children: implications for hearing speech in noise. Sci. Rep. 6, 19737 (2016).
pubmed: 26804355 pmcid: 4726126 doi: 10.1038/srep19737
Ratcliffe, V. F. & Reby, D. Orienting asymmetries in dogs’ responses to different communicatory components of human speech. Curr. Biol. 24, 2908–2912 (2014).
pubmed: 25454584 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.10.030
Washington, S. D. & Tillinghast, J. S. Conjugating time and frequency: hemispheric specialization, acoustic uncertainty, and the mustached bat. Front. Neurosci. 9, 143 (2015).
pubmed: 25926767 pmcid: 4410141 doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00143
Washington, S. D. & Kanwal, J. S. Sex-dependent hemispheric asymmetries for processing frequency-modulated sounds in the primary auditory cortex of the mustached bat. J. Neurophysiol. 108, 1548–1566 (2012).
pubmed: 22649207 pmcid: 3544949 doi: 10.1152/jn.00952.2011
De Valois R. L. & De Valois K. K. Spatial Vision (Oxford Univ. Press, 1990).
Shapley, R. & Lennie, P. Spatial frequency analysis in the visual system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 8, 547–581 (1985).
pubmed: 3920946 doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.08.030185.002555
Kowalski, N., Depireux, D. A. & Shamma, S. A. Analysis of dynamic spectra in ferret primary auditory cortex. I. Characteristics of single-unit responses to moving ripple spectra. J. Neurophysiol. 76, 3503–3523 (1996).
pubmed: 8930289 doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.5.3503
Woolley, S. M. N., Fremouw, T. E., Hsu, A. & Theunissen, F. E. Tuning for spectro-temporal modulations as a mechanism for auditory discrimination of natural sounds. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1371–1379 (2005).
pubmed: 16136039 doi: 10.1038/nn1536
Elhilali, M., Chi, T. & Shamma, S. A. A spectro-temporal modulation index (STMI) for assessment of speech intelligibility. Speech Commun. 41, 331–348 (2003).
doi: 10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00134-6
Elliott, T. M. & Theunissen, F. E. The modulation transfer function for speech intelligibility. PLoS Comput. Biol 5, e1000302 (2009).
pubmed: 19266016 pmcid: 2639724 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000302
Arnal, L. H., Flinker, A., Kleinschmidt, A., Giraud, A.-L. & Poeppel, D. Human screams occupy a privileged niche in the communication soundscape. Curr. Biol. 25, 2051–2056 (2015).
pubmed: 26190070 pmcid: 4562283 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.043
Gross, J. et al. Speech rhythms and multiplexed oscillatory sensory coding in the human brain. Plos Biol. 11, e1001752 (2013).
pubmed: 24391472 pmcid: 3876971 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001752
Schönwiesner, M. & Zatorre, R. J. Spectro-temporal modulation transfer function of single voxels in the human auditory cortex measured with high-resolution fMRI. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 14611–14616 (2009).
pubmed: 19667199 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907682106 pmcid: 2732853
Santoro, R. et al. Encoding of natural sounds at multiple spectral and temporal resolutions in the human auditory cortex. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003412 (2014).
pubmed: 24391486 pmcid: 3879146 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003412
Pasley, B. N. et al. Reconstructing speech from human auditory cortex. PLoS Biol. 10, e1001251 (2012).
pubmed: 22303281 pmcid: 3269422 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001251
Poeppel, D. Pure word deafness and the bilateral processing of the speech code. Cognit. Sci. 25, 679–693 (2001).
doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2505_3
Moore, B. C. J. Auditory filter shapes derived in simultaneous and forward masking. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 70, 1003 (1981).
pubmed: 7288037 doi: 10.1121/1.386950
Ghitza, O. On the upper cutoff frequency of the auditory critical-band envelope detectors in the context of speech perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 1628–1640 (2001).
pubmed: 11572372 doi: 10.1121/1.1396325
Drullman, R., Festen, J. M. & Plomp, R. Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 2670–2680 (1994).
pubmed: 8207140 doi: 10.1121/1.409836
Chi, T., Gao, Y., Guyton, M. C., Ru, P. & Shamma, S. Spectro-temporal modulation transfer functions and speech intelligibility. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 2719 (1999).
pubmed: 10573888 doi: 10.1121/1.428100
Jaeger, T. F. Categorical data analysis: away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. J. Mem. Lang. 59, 434–446 (2008).
pubmed: 19884961 pmcid: 2613284 doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
Lawrence, M. A. Package ‘ez’. http://github.com/mike-lawrence/ez (R package, 2016).
Prins, N. & Kingdom, F. A. A. Applying the model-comparison approach to test specific research hypotheses in psychophysical research using the Palamedes Toolbox. Front. Psychol. 9, 1250 (2018).
pubmed: 30083122 pmcid: 6064978 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01250
Kimura, D. Functional asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening. Cortex 3, 163–178 (1967).
doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(67)80010-8
Shamma, S. On the role of space and time in auditory processing. Trends Cognit. Sci. 5, 340–348 (2001).
doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01704-6
Venezia, J. H., Hickok, G. & Richards, V. M. Auditory ‘bubbles’: efficient classification of the spectrotemporal modulations essential for speech intelligibility. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 140, 1072–1088 (2016).
pubmed: 27586738 pmcid: 5848825 doi: 10.1121/1.4960544
Houtgast, T. & Steeneken, H. J. M. A review of the MTF concept in room acoustics and its use for estimating speech intelligibility in auditoria. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 77, 1069–1077 (1985).
doi: 10.1121/1.392224
Ding, N. et al. Temporal modulations in speech and music. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 81, 181–187 (2017).
pubmed: 28212857 doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.011
Shannon, R. V., Zeng, F. G., Kamath, V., Wygonski, J. & Ekelid, M. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science 270, 303–304 (1995).
pubmed: 7569981 doi: 10.1126/science.270.5234.303
Gabor, D. Theory of communication. Part 1: the analysis of information. J. Inst. Electr. Eng. 93, 429–441 (1946).
Joris, P. X., Schreiner, C. E. & Ress, A. Neural processing of amplitude-modulated sounds. Physiol. Rev. 84, 541–577 (2004).
pubmed: 15044682 doi: 10.1152/physrev.00029.2003
Overath, T., Zhang, Y., Sanes, D. H. & Poeppel, D. Sensitivity to temporal modulation rate and spectral bandwidth in the human auditory system: fMRI evidence. J. Neurophysiol. 107, 2042–2056 (2012).
pubmed: 22298830 pmcid: 3331610 doi: 10.1152/jn.00308.2011
Zatorre, R. J. & Belin, P. Spectral and temporal processing in human auditory cortex. Cereb. Cortex 11, 946–953 (2001).
pubmed: 11549617 doi: 10.1093/cercor/11.10.946
Liégeois-Chauvel, C., Lorenzi, C., Trébuchon, A., Régis, J. & Chauvel, P. Temporal envelope processing in the human left and right auditory cortices. Cereb. Cortex 14, 731–740 (2004).
pubmed: 15054052 doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhh033
Okamoto, H., Stracke, H., Draganova, R. & Pantev, C. Hemispheric asymmetry of auditory evoked fields elicited by spectral versus temporal stimulus change. Cereb. Cortex 19, 245–2297 (2009).
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn245
Wang, Y. et al. Sensitivity to temporal modulation rate and spectral bandwidth in the human auditory system: MEG evidence. J. Neurophysiol. 107, 2033–2041 (2012).
pubmed: 21975451 doi: 10.1152/jn.00310.2011
Schönwiesner, M., Rübsamen, R. & Cramon, Von,D. Y. Hemispheric asymmetry for spectral and temporal processing in the human antero‐lateral auditory belt cortex. Eur. J. Neurosci. 22, 1521–1528 (2005).
pubmed: 16190905 doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04315.x
Jamison, H. L., Watkins, K. E., Bishop, D. V. M. & Matthews, P. M. Hemispheric specialization for processing auditory nonspeech stimuli. Cereb. Cortex 16, 1266–1275 (2006).
pubmed: 16280465 doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhj068
Boemio, A., Fromm, S., Braun, A. & Poeppel, D. Hierarchical and asymmetric temporal sensitivity in human auditory cortices. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 389–395 (2005).
pubmed: 15723061 doi: 10.1038/nn1409
Overath, T., Kumar, S., Kriegstein, von, K. & Griffiths, T. D. Encoding of spectral correlation over time in auditory cortex. J. Neurosci. 28, 13268–13273 (2008).
pubmed: 19052218 pmcid: 3844743 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4596-08.2008
Hyde, K. L., Peretz, I. & Zatorre, R. J. Evidence for the role of the right auditory cortex in fine pitch resolution. Neuropsychologia 46, 632–639 (2008).
pubmed: 17959204 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.09.004
Liégeois-Chauvel, C., de Graaf, J. B., Laguitton, V. & Chauvel, P. Specialization of left auditory cortex for speech perception in man depends on temporal coding. Cereb. Cortex 9, 484–496 (1999).
pubmed: 10450893 doi: 10.1093/cercor/9.5.484
Kriegstein, von et al. How the human brain recognizes speech in the context of changing speakers. J. Neurosci. 30, 629–638 (2010).
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2742-09.2010
Arsenault, J. S. & Buchsbaum, B. R. Distributed neural representations of phonological features during speech perception. J. Neurosci. 35, 634–642 (2015).
pubmed: 25589757 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2454-14.2015 pmcid: 6605373
Millman, R. E., Woods, W. P. & Quinlan, P. T. Functional asymmetries in the representation of noise-vocoded speech. NeuroImage 54, 2364–2373 (2011).
pubmed: 20946961 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.005
Obleser, J., Eisner, F. & Kotz, S. A. Bilateral speech comprehension reflects differential sensitivity to spectral and temporal features. J. Neurosci. 28, 8116–8123 (2008).
pubmed: 18685036 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1290-08.2008 pmcid: 6670773
Morillon, B. et al. Neurophysiological origin of human brain asymmetry for speech and language. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 18688–18693 (2010).
pubmed: 20956297 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1007189107 pmcid: 2972980
Peelle, J. E., Gross, J. & Davis, M. H. Phase-locked responses to speech in human auditory cortex are enhanced during comprehension. Cereb. Cortex 23, 1378–1387 (2013).
pubmed: 22610394 doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs118
Luo, H. & Poeppel, D. Phase patterns of neuronal responses reliably discriminate speech in human auditory cortex. Neuron 54, 1001–1010 (2007).
pubmed: 17582338 pmcid: 2703451 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.004
Morillon, B., Liégeois-Chauvel, C., Arnal, L. H., Bénar, C.-G. & Giraud, A.-L. Asymmetric function of theta and gamma activity in syllable processing: an intra-cortical study. Front. Psychol. 3, 248 (2012).
pubmed: 22833730 pmcid: 3400438 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00248
Giraud, A.-L. et al. Endogenous cortical rhythms determine cerebral specialization for speech perception and production. Neuron 56, 1127–1134 (2007).
pubmed: 18093532 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.09.038
Giraud, A.-L. & Poeppel, D. Cortical oscillations and speech processing: emerging computational principles and operations. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 511–517 (2012).
pubmed: 22426255 pmcid: 4461038 doi: 10.1038/nn.3063
Herdener, M. et al. Spatial representations of temporal and spectral sound cues in human auditory cortex. Cortex 49, 2822–2833 (2013).
pubmed: 23706955 doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.04.003
Barton, B., Venezia, J. H., Saberi, K., Hickok, G. & Brewer, A. A. Orthogonal acoustic dimensions define auditory field maps in human cortex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 20738–20743 (2012).
pubmed: 23188798 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213381109 pmcid: 3528571
Joanisse, M. F. Sensitivity of human auditory cortex to rapid frequency modulation revealed by multivariate representational similarity analysis. Front. Neurosci. 8, 306 (2014).
pubmed: 25324713 pmcid: 4179761 doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00306
Garofolo, J. S. et al. TIMIT acoustic-phonetic continuous speech corpus. (Linguistic Data Consortium, 1993).
Camacho, A. & Harris, J. G. A sawtooth waveform inspired pitch estimator for speech and music. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 124, 1638–1652 (2008).
pubmed: 19045655 doi: 10.1121/1.2951592
Moore, B. C. J. Hearing (Academic, 1995).
Griffin, D. & Jae, Lim. Signal estimation from modified short-time Fourier transform. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 32, 236–243 (1984).
doi: 10.1109/TASSP.1984.1164317
Chi, T. & Shamma, S. NSL Matlab Toolbox (Neural Systems Lab, Maryland, 2005).
Flinker, A. et al. Redefining the role of Broca’s area in speech. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 2871–2875 (2015).
pubmed: 25730850 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1414491112 pmcid: 4352780
Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E. & Schoffelen, J.-M. Fieldtrip: open source software for advanced analysis of meg, eeg, and invasive electrophysiological data. Computational Intell. Neurosci. 2011, 1–9 (2010).
doi: 10.1155/2011/156869
Adachi, Y., Shimogawara, M., Higuchi, M., Haruta, Y. & Ochiai, M. Reduction of nonperiodical environmental magnetic noise in MEG measurement by continuously adjusted least squares method. IEEE Trans. Appl. Superconductivity 11, 669–672 (2001).
doi: 10.1109/77.919433
de Cheveigné, A. & Simon, J. Z. Denoising based on time-shift PCA. J. Neurosci. Method 165, 297–305 (2007).
doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.06.003
Dale, A. M. et al. Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity. Neuron 26, 55–67 (2000).
pubmed: 10798392 doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81138-1
Yang, A. I. et al. Localization of dense intracranial electrode arrays using magnetic resonance imaging. NeuroImage 63, 157–165 (2012).
pubmed: 22759995 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.039
Ashburner, J. A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. NeuroImage 38, 95–113 (2007).
pubmed: 17761438 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.007
Groppe, D. M. et al. iELVis: An open source MATLAB toolbox for localizing and visualizing human intracranial electrode data. J. Neurosci. Method 281, 40–48 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.01.022
Collingridge, D. S. A primer on quantitized data analysis and permutation testing. J. Mix. Methods Res. 7, 81–97 (2012).
doi: 10.1177/1558689812454457

Auteurs

Adeen Flinker (A)

Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA. adeen.f@gmail.com.
Department of Neurology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. adeen.f@gmail.com.

Werner K Doyle (WK)

Department of Neurosurgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Ashesh D Mehta (AD)

Department of Neurosurgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, USA.

Orrin Devinsky (O)

Department of Neurology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

David Poeppel (D)

Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Frankfurt, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH