Continued treatment with secukinumab is associated with high retention or regain of response.


Journal

The British journal of dermatology
ISSN: 1365-2133
Titre abrégé: Br J Dermatol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0004041

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2020
Historique:
accepted: 03 04 2019
pubmed: 12 4 2019
medline: 15 5 2021
entrez: 12 4 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Conventional analyses present aggregate data, masking late responders and efficacy reductions. Secukinumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively neutralizes interleukin (IL)-17A, shows sustained efficacy in moderate-to-severe psoriasis. To determine stability of response to secukinumab, changes in efficacy were assessed in individual patients. This is a post hoc analysis of two phase III randomized controlled trials, FIXTURE (trial registration: NCT01358578) and CLEAR (trial registration: NCT02074982). Patients received secukinumab 300 mg (FIXTURE and CLEAR), etanercept 50 mg (FIXTURE) or ustekinumab 45 or 90 mg (CLEAR) over 52 weeks. Mutually exclusive response categories were defined: ≥ 90% improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) ('excellent'), ≥ 75% improvement in PASI (PASI 75) and < PASI 90 ('good') and < PASI 75 ('insufficient'). Reductions in efficacy were defined as shifts from higher to lower response categories between two consecutive visits maintained for a third consecutive visit. Loss of efficacy was defined as a reduction of efficacy resulting in 'insufficient' response. All comparisons are descriptive. At 52 weeks, in CLEAR, 90·2% (303/336) of patients on secukinumab achieved stable efficacy without loss and 77·7% (261/336) showed stable efficacy without any reduction of response [74·3% (252/339) and 59·9% (203/339) of patients for ustekinumab]. In FIXTURE, 83·5% (273/327) and 66·4% (217/327) of patients on secukinumab had stable efficacy without loss or reduction of response [58·3% (190/326) and 42·6% (139/326) for etanercept]. Response was regained by continuing secukinumab treatment in 50% (8/16) of patients in CLEAR and 26% (9/34) in FIXTURE. Similar patterns were observed for other response definitions. Efficacy with secukinumab was stable over 52 weeks of treatment in most patients. Continued treatment with secukinumab resulted in regain of efficacy in some patients. Persistent loss of response was uncommon. What's already known about this topic? Secukinumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively neutralizes interleukin (IL)-17A, shows significant and sustained efficacy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Secondary loss of response may be experienced by a minority of patients treated with secukinumab, as with other biologics, but the extent of this and the potential for regain of efficacy with continued treatment is not well understood. What does this study add? To determine stability of response to secukinumab and inform clinical practice, changes in efficacy were assessed at individual patient level using response categories. Efficacy with secukinumab was stable over 52 weeks of treatment in most patients, and continued treatment with secukinumab resulted in efficacy regain after loss in some patients. Persistent loss of response was uncommon. Patient factors such as body weight may affect the likelihood of loss of efficacy.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Conventional analyses present aggregate data, masking late responders and efficacy reductions. Secukinumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively neutralizes interleukin (IL)-17A, shows sustained efficacy in moderate-to-severe psoriasis.
OBJECTIVES
To determine stability of response to secukinumab, changes in efficacy were assessed in individual patients.
METHODS
This is a post hoc analysis of two phase III randomized controlled trials, FIXTURE (trial registration: NCT01358578) and CLEAR (trial registration: NCT02074982). Patients received secukinumab 300 mg (FIXTURE and CLEAR), etanercept 50 mg (FIXTURE) or ustekinumab 45 or 90 mg (CLEAR) over 52 weeks. Mutually exclusive response categories were defined: ≥ 90% improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) ('excellent'), ≥ 75% improvement in PASI (PASI 75) and < PASI 90 ('good') and < PASI 75 ('insufficient'). Reductions in efficacy were defined as shifts from higher to lower response categories between two consecutive visits maintained for a third consecutive visit. Loss of efficacy was defined as a reduction of efficacy resulting in 'insufficient' response. All comparisons are descriptive.
RESULTS
At 52 weeks, in CLEAR, 90·2% (303/336) of patients on secukinumab achieved stable efficacy without loss and 77·7% (261/336) showed stable efficacy without any reduction of response [74·3% (252/339) and 59·9% (203/339) of patients for ustekinumab]. In FIXTURE, 83·5% (273/327) and 66·4% (217/327) of patients on secukinumab had stable efficacy without loss or reduction of response [58·3% (190/326) and 42·6% (139/326) for etanercept]. Response was regained by continuing secukinumab treatment in 50% (8/16) of patients in CLEAR and 26% (9/34) in FIXTURE. Similar patterns were observed for other response definitions.
CONCLUSIONS
Efficacy with secukinumab was stable over 52 weeks of treatment in most patients. Continued treatment with secukinumab resulted in regain of efficacy in some patients. Persistent loss of response was uncommon. What's already known about this topic? Secukinumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively neutralizes interleukin (IL)-17A, shows significant and sustained efficacy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Secondary loss of response may be experienced by a minority of patients treated with secukinumab, as with other biologics, but the extent of this and the potential for regain of efficacy with continued treatment is not well understood. What does this study add? To determine stability of response to secukinumab and inform clinical practice, changes in efficacy were assessed at individual patient level using response categories. Efficacy with secukinumab was stable over 52 weeks of treatment in most patients, and continued treatment with secukinumab resulted in efficacy regain after loss in some patients. Persistent loss of response was uncommon. Patient factors such as body weight may affect the likelihood of loss of efficacy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30972746
doi: 10.1111/bjd.17991
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized 0
secukinumab DLG4EML025
Ustekinumab FU77B4U5Z0
Etanercept OP401G7OJC

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01358578', 'NCT02074982']

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

67-75

Subventions

Organisme : Novartis Pharma GmbH, Nuremberg, Germany
Pays : International

Informations de copyright

© 2019 British Association of Dermatologists.

Références

Puig L. PASI90 response: the new standard in therapeutic efficacy for psoriasis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2015; 29:645-8.
Zeichner JA, Armstrong A. The role of IL-17 in the pathogenesis and treatment of psoriasis. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 2016; 9:S3-6.
Langley RG, Elewski BE, Lebwohl M et al. Secukinumab in plaque psoriasis - results of two phase 3 trials. NEJM 2014; 371:326-38.
Baeten D, Baraliakos X, Braun J et al. Anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody secukinumab in treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2013; 382:1705-13.
McInnes IB, Mease PJ, Kirkham B et al. Secukinumab, a human anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody, in patients with psoriatic arthritis (FUTURE 2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2015; 386:1137-46.
Thaci D, Blauvelt A, Reich K et al. Secukinumab is superior to ustekinumab in clearing skin of subjects with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: CLEAR, a randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 2015; 73:400-9.
Blauvelt A, Reich K, Tsai TF et al. Secukinumab is superior to ustekinumab in clearing skin of subjects with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis up to 1 year: results from the CLEAR study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017; 76:60-9e9.
Bissonnette R, Luger T, Thaci D et al. Secukinumab demonstrates high sustained efficacy and a favorable safety profile in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis through 5 years of treatment (SCULPTURE extension study). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2018; 32:1507-14.
Strober BE. Why biologic therapies sometimes lose efficacy. Semin Cutan Med Surg 2016; 35:S78-80.
Georgakopoulos JR, Ighani A, Phung M et al. Drug survival of secukinumab in real-world plaque psoriasis patients: a 52-week, multicenter, retrospective study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017; 78:1019-20.
Mattei PL, Corey KC, Kimball AB. Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI): the correlation between disease severity and psychological burden in patients treated with biological therapies. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2014; 28:333-7.
Reich A, Szepietowski JC. Frontiers in neuroscience clinical aspects of itch: psoriasis. In: Itch: Mechanisms and Treatment (Carstens E, Akiyama T, eds). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, 2014.
Huang YYM, Ruth JS, Hsu S. Loss of efficacy of secukinumab for psoriasis at 24 to 32 weeks. J Am Acad Dermatol 2016; 75:e169.
Spindeldreher S, Maillere B, Correia E et al. Secukinumab demonstrates significantly lower immunogenicity potential compared to ixekizumab. Dermatol Ther 2018; 8:57-68.
Reich K, Blauvelt A, Armstrong A et al. Secukinumab, a fully human anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody, exhibits minimal immunogenicity in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Br J Dermatol 2017; 176:752-8.
Armstrong AW, Harskamp CT, Armstrong EJ. The association between psoriasis and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Nutr Diabetes 2012; 2:e54.
Takahashi H, Iizuka H. Psoriasis and metabolic syndrome. J Dermatol 2012; 39:212-8.
Singh S, Facciorusso A, Singh AG et al. Obesity and response to anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha agents in patients with select immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE 2018; 13:e0195123.
Yanaba K, Umezawa Y, Ito T et al. Impact of obesity on the efficacy of ustekinumab in Japanese patients with psoriasis: a retrospective cohort study of 111 patients. Arch Dermatol Res 2014; 306:921-5.
Singh S, George J, Boland BS et al. Primary non-response to tumor necrosis factor antagonists is associated with inferior response to second-line biologics in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Crohns Colitis 2018; 12:635-43.
Papp KA, Gordon KB, Langley RG et al. Impact of previous biologic use on the efficacy and safety of brodalumab and ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: integrated analysis of the randomized controlled trials AMAGINE-2 and AMAGINE-3. Br J Dermat 2018; 179:320-8.
Ryan C, Korman NJ, Gelfand JM et al. Research gaps in psoriasis: opportunities for future studies. J Am Acad Dermatol 2014; 70:146-67.
Hancox JG, Sheridan SC, Feldman SR et al. Seasonal variation of dermatologic disease in the USA: a study of office visits from 1990 to 1998. Int J Dermatol 2004; 43:6-11.
Ruano J, Velez A, Casas E et al. Factors influencing seasonal patterns of relapse in anti-TNF psoriatic responders after temporary drug discontinuation. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2014; 28:516-8.
Thorleifsdottir RH, Eysteinsdottir JH, Olafsson JH et al. Throat infections are associated with exacerbation in a substantial proportion of patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. Acta Derm Venereo 2016; 96:788-91.
Thaçi D. Secukinumab real-world effectiveness data on plaque psoriasis treatment in Germany corroborate pivotal clinical trial results: analysis of the first 2,000 subjects enrolled in the PROSPECT study. In: 27th EADV Congress, Paris, 2018, Vol. P1994.

Auteurs

M Augustin (M)

Institute of Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing, University Medical Center of Hamburg Eppendorf, Germany.

D Thaci (D)

Comprehensive Centre of Inflammation Medicine, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

K Eyerich (K)

Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

A Pinter (A)

University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

M Radtke (M)

Institute of Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing, University Medical Center of Hamburg Eppendorf, Germany.

F Lauffer (F)

Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

U Mrowietz (U)

Psoriasis-Center, Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.

S Gerdes (S)

Psoriasis-Center, Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.

D Pariser (D)

Eastern Virginia Medical School and Virginia Clinical Research, Inc., Norfolk, VA, U.S.A.

M Lebwohl (M)

Department of Dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, U.S.A.

C Sieder (C)

Novartis Pharma GmbH, Nürnberg, Germany.

N Melzer (N)

Novartis Pharma GmbH, Nürnberg, Germany.

K Reich (K)

Dermatologikum Berlin and SCIderm Research Institute, Hamburg, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH