CRISPR in the North American popular press.
CRISPR
ELSI
biotechnology
gene editing
media
Journal
Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics
ISSN: 1530-0366
Titre abrégé: Genet Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9815831
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2019
10 2019
Historique:
received:
05
12
2018
accepted:
27
02
2019
pubmed:
13
4
2019
medline:
18
3
2020
entrez:
13
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
CRISPR is often called one of the century's most important discoveries and is commonly discussed in terms of its momentous potential impacts. This study analyzed how CRISPR is discussed in the North American popular press, including how it is defined, and which benefits and risks/concerns are attributed to the technology. Using the Factiva database, we identified 228 relevant, nonduplicated articles containing either "CRISPR" or "C.R.I.S.P.R.," published in popular US and Canadian news sources between 1 January 2012 and 12 July 2017. Content analysis was performed on the articles. CRISPR is most often discussed in the context of human health (83.8%), compared with animals (26.3%) and plants (20.6%). Nearly all articles (96.1%) presented CRISPR's potential benefits; 61.4% of articles presented CRISPR-related risks/concerns, the vast majority of which focused on the uncertainty surrounding CRISPR, specifically with respect to germline modifications. Overall, the discourse suggests a strong promotion of CRISPR, but an element of caution is also evident. Technical as well as ethical, legal, and social risks/concerns play a prominent role. This media portrayal of CRISPR might help facilitate more sophisticated and balanced policy responses, where the scientific potential of the technology is highlighted alongside broader social considerations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30976097
doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0482-5
pii: S1098-3600(21)04486-5
pmc: PMC6774996
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2184-2189Références
Nat Biotechnol. 2016 Sep 08;34(9):933-941
pubmed: 27606440
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82
pubmed: 23092060
J Bioeth Inq. 2018 Sep;15(3):327-335
pubmed: 29968018
Science. 2005 Feb 18;307(5712):1028
pubmed: 15718439
EMBO Rep. 2015 Aug;16(8):879-80
pubmed: 26138102
JAMA. 2002 Feb 13;287(6):773
pubmed: 11851549
Sci Transl Med. 2015 Mar 11;7(278):278ps4
pubmed: 25761887
Genet Med. 2018 Sep;20(9):950-956
pubmed: 29300377
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 9;11(11):e0166140
pubmed: 27829008
Nat Biotechnol. 2015 May;33(5):478-86
pubmed: 25965754
Genet Med. 2007 Dec;9(12):850-5
pubmed: 18091435