'It's difficult, I think it's complicated': Health care professionals' barriers and enablers to providing opportunistic behaviour change interventions during routine medical consultations.


Journal

British journal of health psychology
ISSN: 2044-8287
Titre abrégé: Br J Health Psychol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9605409

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2019
Historique:
received: 18 07 2018
revised: 15 02 2019
pubmed: 13 4 2019
medline: 30 11 2019
entrez: 13 4 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Internationally, public health strategies encourage health care professionals to deliver opportunistic behaviour change interventions. The present study: (1) examines the barriers and enablers to delivering interventions during routine consultations, and (2) provides recommendations for the design of interventions to increase delivery of opportunistic behaviour change interventions. Qualitative interview study. Twenty-eight semi-structured interviews were conducted with patient-facing health care professionals. The Behaviour Change Wheel informed a framework analysis in which findings were mapped onto the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Intervention functions and behaviour change techniques (BCTs) targeting each TDF domain were identified. Health care professionals understood the importance of opportunistic behaviour change interventions (beliefs about consequences), but were sceptical about their capabilities to facilitate behaviour change with patients (beliefs about capabilities). Some clinicians were unwilling to discuss behaviours perceived as unrelated to the patient's visit (social/professional role and identity). Discipline-specific tasks were prioritized, and delivering interventions was perceived as psychologically burdensome. One-to-one contact was favoured over busy hospital settings (environmental context and resources). Seven intervention functions (training, restriction, environmental restructuring, enablement, education, persuasion, and modelling) and eight BCT groupings (antecedents, associations, comparison of outcomes, covert learning, feedback and monitoring, natural consequences, reward and threat, and self-belief) were identified. Across disciplines, health care professionals see the value of opportunistic behaviour change interventions. Barriers related to workload, the clinical environment, competence, and perceptions of the health care professional role must be addressed, using appropriate intervention functions and BCTs, in order to support health care professionals to increase the delivery of interventions in routine practice. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? Brief, opportunistic interventions can be a cost effective way of addressing population health problems. Public health policies compel health care professionals to deliver behaviour change interventions opportunistically. Health care professionals do not always deliver interventions opportunistically during routine medical consultations; however the barriers and enablers are currently unclear. What does this study add? This is the first study to examine cross-disciplinary barriers and enablers to delivering opportunistic behaviour change interventions. Across diverse professional groups, working in different medical professions, participants saw the value of delivering opportunistic behaviour change interventions. Targeting key theoretical domains that are shared across professional groups may be useful for increasing the delivery of opportunistic behaviour change interventions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30977291
doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12368
pmc: PMC6766974
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

571-592

Informations de copyright

© 2019 The Authors. British Journal of Health Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.

Références

Am J Prev Med. 2002 May;22(4):267-84
pubmed: 11988383
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
Med Educ. 2006 Apr;40(4):314-21
pubmed: 16573666
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2007 Dec;39(4):423-33
pubmed: 18303699
Br J Health Psychol. 2009 Nov;14(Pt 4):625-46
pubmed: 19159506
Implement Sci. 2009 May 21;4:29
pubmed: 19460163
Br J Gen Pract. 2009 Sep;59(566):682-90
pubmed: 19674514
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42
pubmed: 21513547
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Apr 23;13:31
pubmed: 22524484
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:37
pubmed: 22530986
Psychol Health. 2013;28(6):653-74
pubmed: 23278305
Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Jun;35(3):447-54
pubmed: 23456174
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117
pubmed: 24047204
Br J Health Psychol. 2014 May;19(2):274-91
pubmed: 24112280
BMC Pediatr. 2014 Mar 13;14:71
pubmed: 24620915
Br J Health Psychol. 2015 Feb;20(1):130-50
pubmed: 24815766
Implement Sci. 2014 May 23;9:60
pubmed: 24886520
Addiction. 2014 Nov;109(11):1811-23
pubmed: 25041084
Health Psychol. 2015 Mar;34(3):253-61
pubmed: 25133842
Br J Sports Med. 2016 Apr;50(7):408-17
pubmed: 26438429
Int J Behav Med. 2016 Apr;23(2):168-78
pubmed: 26490451
Anesth Analg. 2016 May;122(5):1311-20
pubmed: 27101492
J Public Health Dent. 2017 Dec;77(1):47-53
pubmed: 27568867
Ann Behav Med. 2018 May 18;52(6):489-500
pubmed: 27680569
Midwifery. 2017 Jun;49:110-116
pubmed: 27751526
Lancet. 2016 Nov 19;388(10059):2492-2500
pubmed: 27789061
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 13;12(1):e0170228
pubmed: 28085944
BMC Cancer. 2017 May 19;17(1):348
pubmed: 28526000
Implement Sci. 2017 Jun 21;12(1):77
pubmed: 28637486
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 Dec;85(12):1182-1198
pubmed: 29189034
Implement Sci. 2018 Sep 21;13(1):122
pubmed: 30241557
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 1;13(11):e0206676
pubmed: 30383792
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Nov 7;18(1):93
pubmed: 30404638
J Behav Med. 1987 Oct;10(5):481-500
pubmed: 3430590
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571

Auteurs

Chris Keyworth (C)

Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, UK.

Tracy Epton (T)

Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, UK.

Joanna Goldthorpe (J)

Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, UK.

Rachel Calam (R)

Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, UK.

Christopher J Armitage (CJ)

Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre and Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (MFT), and NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH