A Machine Learning Strategy for Autism Screening in Toddlers.
Journal
Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP
ISSN: 1536-7312
Titre abrégé: J Dev Behav Pediatr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8006933
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2019
06 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
16
4
2019
medline:
22
8
2020
entrez:
16
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) screening can improve prognosis via early diagnosis and intervention, but lack of time and training can deter pediatric screening. The Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised (M-CHAT-R) is a widely used screener but requires follow-up questions and error-prone human scoring and interpretation. We consider an automated machine learning (ML) method for overcoming barriers to ASD screening, specifically using the feedforward neural network (fNN). The fNN technique was applied using archival M-CHAT-R data of 14,995 toddlers (age 16-30 months, 46.51% male). The 20 M-CHAT-R items were inputs, and ASD diagnosis after follow-up and diagnostic evaluation (i.e., ASD or not ASD) was the output. The sample was divided into subgroups by race (i.e., white and black), sex (i.e., boys and girls), and maternal education (i.e., below and above 15 years of education completed) to examine subgroup differences. Each subgroup was evaluated for best-performing fNN models. For the total sample, best results yielded 99.72% correct classification using 18 items. Best results yielded 99.92% correct classification using 14 items for white toddlers and 99.79% correct classification using 18 items for black toddlers. In boys, best results yielded 99.64% correct classification using 18 items, whereas best results yielded 99.95% correct classification using 18 items in girls. For the case when maternal education is 15 years or less (i.e., associate degree and below), best results were 99.75% correct classification when using 16 items. Results were essentially the same when maternal education was 16 years or more (i.e., above associate degree); that is, 99.70% correct classification was obtained using 16 items. The ML method was comparable to the M-CHAT-R with follow-up items in accuracy of ASD diagnosis while using fewer items. Therefore, ML may be a beneficial tool in implementing automatic, efficient scoring that negates the need for labor-intensive follow-up and circumvents human error, providing an advantage over previous screening methods.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30985384
doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000668
pmc: PMC6579619
mid: NIHMS1520926
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
369-376Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R01 HD039961
Pays : United States
Références
Pediatrics. 2002 Jul;110(1 Pt 1):184-6
pubmed: 12093969
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2002 Dec;41(12):1447-53
pubmed: 12447031
Am J Public Health. 2005 Nov;95(11):1928-32
pubmed: 16195523
Pediatrics. 2005 Dec;116(6):1480-6
pubmed: 16322174
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2006 Apr;27(2 Suppl):S88-94
pubmed: 16685190
Pediatrics. 2007 Nov;120(5):1183-215
pubmed: 17967920
BMC Pediatr. 2007 Nov 20;7:37
pubmed: 18021459
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2012 Mar 30;61(3):1-19
pubmed: 22456193
J Autism Dev Disord. 2013 Oct;43(10):2269-79
pubmed: 23386118
Pediatrics. 2013 Apr;131(4):e1121-7
pubmed: 23530174
Pediatrics. 2014 Jan;133(1):37-45
pubmed: 24366990
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;53(2):141-52
pubmed: 24472250
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Mar 28;63(2):1-21
pubmed: 24670961
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2014 May;35(4):247-56
pubmed: 24799263