BRAF status as a predictive factor for response in isolated limb perfusion.


Journal

International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group
ISSN: 1464-5157
Titre abrégé: Int J Hyperthermia
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8508395

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
pubmed: 17 4 2019
medline: 18 12 2019
entrez: 17 4 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) is a treatment option for unresectable in-transit melanoma metastases of the extremities. Approximately two-thirds of the patients have a complete response, and known predictive factors mainly regard tumor burden. In an attempt to identify subgroups with higher response rates, we retrospectively analyzed the predictive value of the BRAF V600E/K mutation for response at our institution. Between January 2012 and December 2017, 98 consecutive patients underwent first-time ILP with melphalan for melanoma in-transit metastases and were included in the study. Data was retrieved from our prospectively kept database. Tumor burden was assessed preoperatively as number of lesions and largest tumor diameter. BRAF status was determined according to clinical routine. Response rates were classified according to WHO criteria. Of the 98 patients included in the analysis, 32 patients had a BRAF V600E/K mutation (33%) and 66 patients were BRAF wild type (wt). There was no difference in age, sex or tumor burden between the groups. Comparing response between BRAF V600E/K mutation and BRAF wt, the overall response rate was 69% vs. 77% (p=.36) and the complete response rate was 47% vs. 52% (p=.67). There was no difference in survival, with a median survival of 47 months. In this consecutive series of patients, BRAF V600E/K mutation was not found to be a significant factor for response or survival following ILP.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) is a treatment option for unresectable in-transit melanoma metastases of the extremities. Approximately two-thirds of the patients have a complete response, and known predictive factors mainly regard tumor burden. In an attempt to identify subgroups with higher response rates, we retrospectively analyzed the predictive value of the BRAF V600E/K mutation for response at our institution.
METHODS
Between January 2012 and December 2017, 98 consecutive patients underwent first-time ILP with melphalan for melanoma in-transit metastases and were included in the study. Data was retrieved from our prospectively kept database. Tumor burden was assessed preoperatively as number of lesions and largest tumor diameter. BRAF status was determined according to clinical routine. Response rates were classified according to WHO criteria.
RESULTS
Of the 98 patients included in the analysis, 32 patients had a BRAF V600E/K mutation (33%) and 66 patients were BRAF wild type (wt). There was no difference in age, sex or tumor burden between the groups. Comparing response between BRAF V600E/K mutation and BRAF wt, the overall response rate was 69% vs. 77% (p=.36) and the complete response rate was 47% vs. 52% (p=.67). There was no difference in survival, with a median survival of 47 months.
CONCLUSION
In this consecutive series of patients, BRAF V600E/K mutation was not found to be a significant factor for response or survival following ILP.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30987478
doi: 10.1080/02656736.2019.1601778
doi:

Substances chimiques

Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf EC 2.7.11.1

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

511-515

Auteurs

Valerio Belgrano (V)

a Department of Surgery , Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg , Gothenburg , Sweden.
b Sahlgrenska Cancer Center , University of Gothenburg , Gothenburg , Sweden.

Jan Mattsson (J)

a Department of Surgery , Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg , Gothenburg , Sweden.
c Department of Surgery , Sahlgrenska University Hospital , Gothenburg , Sweden.

Jonas Nilsson (J)

b Sahlgrenska Cancer Center , University of Gothenburg , Gothenburg , Sweden.

Roger Olofsson Bagge (R)

a Department of Surgery , Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg , Gothenburg , Sweden.
b Sahlgrenska Cancer Center , University of Gothenburg , Gothenburg , Sweden.
c Department of Surgery , Sahlgrenska University Hospital , Gothenburg , Sweden.
d Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine , University of Gothenburg , Gothenburg , Sweden.

Dimitrios Katsarelias (D)

a Department of Surgery , Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg , Gothenburg , Sweden.
c Department of Surgery , Sahlgrenska University Hospital , Gothenburg , Sweden.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH