Safety of percutaneous renal cryoablation: an international multicentre experience from the EuRECA retrospective percutaneous database.
Bleeding
Complications
Cryoablation
Kidney
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Nov 2019
Historique:
received:
13
11
2018
accepted:
20
03
2019
revised:
05
01
2019
pubmed:
17
4
2019
medline:
15
1
2020
entrez:
17
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate the safety profile of percutaneous cryoablation of renal tumours < 7 cm, utilising data extracted from an international multicentre registry. A retrospective review of all immediate and delayed complications from a multicentre database was performed and was categorised according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Statistical analysis was performed for both overall complications (all Clavien-Dindo) and major complications (Clavien-Dindo 3 to 5). The following criteria were identified as potential predictive factors for complications: centre number, modality of image guidance, tumour size (≤ 4 cm vs. > 4 cm), number of tumours treated in the same session (1 vs. > 1) and tumour histology. A total of 713 renal tumours underwent ablation in 647 individual sessions. In 596 of the cases, one tumour was treated; in the remaining 51 cases, several tumours were treated per session. Mean lesion size was 2.8 cm. Fifty-four complications (Clavien-Dindo 1 to 5) occurred as a result of the 647 procedures, corresponding to an overall complication rate of 8.3%. The most frequent complication was bleeding (3.2%), with 9 cases (1.4%) requiring subsequent treatment. The rate of major complication was 3.4%. The only statistically significant prognostic factor for a major complication was a tumour size > 4 cm. Percutaneous renal cryoablation is associated with a low rate of complications. Tumours measuring more than 4 cm are associated with a higher risk of major complications. • Percutaneous kidney cryoablation has a low rate of complications. • Bleeding is the most frequent complication. • A tumour size superior to 4 cm is a predictive factor of major complication.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30989346
doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06191-y
pii: 10.1007/s00330-019-06191-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6293-6299Références
Eur Urol. 2015 Feb;67(2):252-9
pubmed: 25108580
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016 Nov;39(11):1604-1610
pubmed: 27435583
Cryobiology. 1998 Nov;37(3):171-86
pubmed: 9787063
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017 Feb;40(2):177-191
pubmed: 27987000
BJU Int. 2014 Mar;113(3):416-28
pubmed: 24053769
Insights Imaging. 2017 Jun;8(3):357-363
pubmed: 28500486
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014 Dec;37(6):1494-9
pubmed: 24385225
Invest Urol. 1976 Nov;14(3):241-5
pubmed: 992978
Eur Radiol. 2012 Nov;22(11):2547-52
pubmed: 22660984
BJU Int. 2013 Oct;112(6):758-65
pubmed: 23581293
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018 Feb;29(2):285-290
pubmed: 29414197
BJU Int. 2017 Mar;119(3):390-395
pubmed: 27488479
J Radiol. 2011 Sep;92(9):774-88
pubmed: 21944236
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016 Apr;41(4):754-66
pubmed: 26915090
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018 Jan;29(1):18-29
pubmed: 29102464
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012 Jan;23(1):48-54
pubmed: 22037491
Turk J Urol. 2018 Mar;44(2):142-147
pubmed: 29511584
Cryobiology. 2018 Aug;83:90-94
pubmed: 29890126
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013 Jun;36(3):783-90
pubmed: 22933102
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018 Aug;29(8):1122-1126
pubmed: 29887184
Radiology. 2018 Nov;289(2):554-561
pubmed: 30084744
Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13
pubmed: 15273542
Cryobiology. 2007 Dec;55(3):189-99
pubmed: 17888898
Radiology. 2014 Sep;272(3):903-10
pubmed: 24814178
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Dec;201(6):1353-61
pubmed: 24261377
J Endourol. 2010 Aug;24(8):1255-62
pubmed: 20380510
Eur Radiol. 2019 Mar;29(3):1293-1307
pubmed: 30255245
Urol Oncol. 2013 Jul;31(5):686-92
pubmed: 21723752
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Mar;100:14-22
pubmed: 29496072