Decision-making in livestock biosecurity practices amidst environmental and social uncertainty: Evidence from an experimental game.
Adolescent
Adult
Agriculture
Animal Husbandry
/ methods
Animals
Cluster Analysis
Communicable Disease Control
/ methods
Decision Making
Disease Outbreaks
/ prevention & control
Female
Games, Experimental
Health Policy
Humans
Incidence
Information Dissemination
Livestock
Male
Middle Aged
Regression Analysis
Risk Factors
Security Measures
Surveys and Questionnaires
Swine
Swine Diseases
/ epidemiology
Uncertainty
United States
Young Adult
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
14
06
2018
accepted:
14
03
2019
entrez:
18
4
2019
pubmed:
18
4
2019
medline:
28
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Livestock industries are vulnerable to disease threats, which can cost billions of dollars and have substantial negative social ramifications. Losses are mitigated through increased use of disease-related biosecurity practices, making increased biosecurity an industry goal. Currently, there is no industry-wide standard for sharing information about disease incidence or on-site biosecurity strategies, resulting in uncertainty regarding disease prevalence and biosecurity strategies employed by industry stakeholders. Using an experimental simulation game, with primarily student participants, we examined willingness to invest in biosecurity when confronted with disease outbreak scenarios. We varied the scenarios by changing the information provided about 1) disease incidence and 2) biosecurity strategy or response by production facilities to the threat of disease. Here we show that willingness to invest in biosecurity increases with increased information about disease incidence, but decreases with increased information about biosecurity practices used by nearby facilities. Thus, the type or context of the uncertainty confronting the decision maker may be a major factor influencing behavior. Our findings suggest that policies and practices that encourage greater sharing of disease incidence information should have the greatest benefit for protecting herd health.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30995253
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214500
pii: PONE-D-18-17861
pmc: PMC6469775
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0214500Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2012 Mar;59 Suppl 1:9-17
pubmed: 25471241
Science. 2001 May 11;292(5519):1155-60
pubmed: 11303090
Am J Public Health. 2001 Sep;91(9):1351-5
pubmed: 11527753
Prev Vet Med. 2016 Sep 15;132:20-31
pubmed: 27664445
J Dairy Sci. 2017 May;100(5):3329-3347
pubmed: 28237585
Psychol Sci. 2008 Aug;19(8):796-801
pubmed: 18816287
Animals (Basel). 2016 Oct 11;6(10):
pubmed: 27727168
Psychol Rev. 2003 Jul;110(3):403-21
pubmed: 12885109
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 Aug;14(3):311-7
pubmed: 16893274
J Commun. 2013 Feb;63(1):95-115
pubmed: 26560123
Front Vet Sci. 2016 Jun 22;3:46
pubmed: 27446934
Epidemiol Infect. 2015 Aug;143(11):2355-66
pubmed: 25427776