Introducing an AKI predictive tool for patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery.
anaesthesia
healthcare quality improvement
hospital medicine
pdsa
surgery
Journal
BMJ open quality
ISSN: 2399-6641
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open Qual
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101710381
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
22
12
2017
revised:
17
02
2019
accepted:
26
02
2019
entrez:
19
4
2019
pubmed:
19
4
2019
medline:
19
4
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Patients undergoing surgery are at increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). AKI is associated with adverse outcomes such as increased mortality and future risk of developing chronic kidney disease. We have developed a validated preoperative scoring tool to predict postoperative AKI in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery using seven readily available parameters. The aim of this project was to establish the use of this scoring tool with a target compliance of 80% in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery requiring an overnight stay at Perth Royal Infirmary, a district general hospital in NHS Tayside. We created an intervention bundle for patients at high risk of AKI, which we defined as greater than 10%. An electronic tool available on smartphones and desktop computers was developed that can be used to calculate the score. The interventions were incorporated into the electronic tool and posters outlining the intervention were placed in clinical areas. Patients undergoing elective procedures were scored in the preassessment clinic while emergency patients were scored by the admitting doctors. The score was introduced using four PDSA cycles. This confirmed that the scoring tool functioned well and was being used accurately. Compliance for patients undergoing elective surgery was reasonable at 19/24 (79%) in the third and fourth PDSA cycles but was poorer for emergency admissions with compliance of only 3/7 (43%). There was excellent compliance with the suggested medication changes and postoperative blood test monitoring as advised by our intervention bundle for those at high risk of AKI. Fluid balance monitoring was advised for all patients but the outcome was similar following our intervention at 27/41 (66%) compared with 23/37 (62%) in the baseline data collection. Compliance with fluid balance monitoring was higher in patients at high risk of AKI (9/12, 75%).
Identifiants
pubmed: 30997409
doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000306
pii: bmjoq-2017-000306
pmc: PMC6440603
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e000306Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Oct 6;44(7):1393-9
pubmed: 15464318
Br J Anaesth. 2015 Dec;115 Suppl 2:ii3-14
pubmed: 26658199
Kidney Int. 2007 Sep;72(5):624-31
pubmed: 17622275
Lancet. 2015 Oct 10;386(10002):1465-71
pubmed: 26466051
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 May 1;189(9):1075-81
pubmed: 24601781
Kidney Int. 2012 Mar;81(5):477-85
pubmed: 22157656
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Jan;99(1):251-7
pubmed: 25440281
Kidney Int. 2012 Mar;81(5):442-8
pubmed: 22113526
BMJ. 2015 Nov 11;351:h5639
pubmed: 26561522
Lancet. 2012 Aug 25;380(9843):756-66
pubmed: 22617274