The aggregate income losses from childhood stunting and the returns to a nutrition intervention aimed at reducing stunting.
Adult
Body Height
Child
Child Development
Child Nutrition Disorders
/ epidemiology
Child, Preschool
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Developing Countries
/ statistics & numerical data
Health Promotion
/ organization & administration
Humans
Nutritional Status
Salaries and Fringe Benefits
/ statistics & numerical data
Economic cost
Key words
Nutrition interventions
Rate-of-return
Stunting
Journal
Economics and human biology
ISSN: 1873-6130
Titre abrégé: Econ Hum Biol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101166135
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2019
08 2019
Historique:
received:
27
07
2018
revised:
17
12
2018
accepted:
28
01
2019
pubmed:
21
4
2019
medline:
30
1
2020
entrez:
21
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We undertake two calculations, one for all developing countries, the other for 34 developing countries that together account for 90% of the world's stunted children. The first asks how much lower a country's per capita income is today as a result of having a fraction of its workforce been stunted in childhood. We use a development accounting framework, relying on micro-econometric estimates of the effects of childhood stunting on adult wages through their effects on years of schooling, cognitive skills, and height, parsing out the relative contribution of each set of returns to avoid double counting. We estimate that, on average, the per capita income penalty from stunting is between 5-7%, depending on the assumption. In our second calculation we estimate the economic value and the costs associates with scaling up a package of nutrition interventions using the same methodology and set of assumptions used in the first calculation. We take a package of 10 nutrition interventions that has data on both effects and costs, and we estimate the rate-of-return to gradually introducing this program over a period of 10 years in 34 countries that together account for 90% of the world's stunted children. We estimate a rate-of-return of 12%, and a benefit-cost ratio of 5:1-6:1.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31003858
pii: S1570-677X(18)30210-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2019.01.010
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
225-238Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.