Fit for purpose? OrganisationaL prOdUctivity and woRkforce wellbeIng in workSpaces in Hospital (FLOURISH): a multimethod qualitative study protocol.
Australia
Delivery of Health Care
/ organization & administration
Efficiency, Organizational
/ standards
Health Personnel
/ psychology
Hospital Design and Construction
/ methods
Humans
Job Satisfaction
Medical Errors
/ prevention & control
Patient Participation
Proof of Concept Study
Qualitative Research
Research Design
Safety
Telemedicine
mobile methods
operating theatre
qualitative research
work-as-done
workspace and practice
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 04 2019
20 04 2019
Historique:
entrez:
22
4
2019
pubmed:
22
4
2019
medline:
10
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Workspaces are socially constructed environments where social relationships are produced, reproduced, challenged and transformed. Their primary function is to support high-quality service delivery to the benefit of 'patients'. They are also settings where employees can work effectively, in a safe and healthy environment, delivering a high-quality service according to a 'Work-As-Done' rather than a 'Work-As-Imagined' model. However, hospital design is currently based on a managerial understanding of work accomplishments, often falling short of understanding what is actually happening on the ground. Furthermore, the research landscape lacks rigorous assessment of these complex sociological and health research concepts, either within the Australian context where this protocol is set, or internationally.This paper describes an innovative protocol aimed at examining healthcare employees' and organisations' concerns and beliefs in workspace design. It outlines research investigating the effect of workspace use on productivity, health and safety and worker satisfaction, to clarify Work-As-Done, while creating healthy and more fulfilling environments. This is a proof-of-concept study, taking place between June 2018 and April 2019, employing a multimethod, qualitative approach for in-depth assessment of one Australian, private, university hospital environment, using as its 'case' the Gastroenterology Surgical Unit. It involves (1) observations and informal interviews (shadowing) with employees and patients as they traverse hospital spaces and (2) visual data of spatial use. Fieldnotes will be analysed thematically, and visual data analysed using a predefined schematic framework (a visual taxonomy). Overarching themes and categories will be considered corroboratively, mixing visual and textual data to build an iterative and dynamic picture. Ethical considerations will be discussed, while approval has been granted by the University's Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/5201800282), along with Governance approved by the Health Clinical Research Executive (CRG2018005). Study results will be disseminated through publications, research conferences and public reports.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31005940
pii: bmjopen-2018-027636
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027636
pmc: PMC6500262
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e027636Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: JC is an employee of the case site and will not, therefore, be involved in data analysis.
Références
BMJ. 2016 May 03;353:i2139
pubmed: 27143499
Arch Surg. 1999 Sep;134(9):1011-6
pubmed: 10487599
Health Place. 2009 Mar;15(1):315-22
pubmed: 18675577
Qual Health Res. 2003 Jan;13(1):77-99
pubmed: 12564264
Health Place. 2007 Jun;13(2):532-44
pubmed: 16996775
BMJ. 2004 May 8;328(7448):1115-8
pubmed: 15130981
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Nov;65(9):1825-38
pubmed: 17706331
Health Place. 1997 Sep;3(3):171-80
pubmed: 10670968
Med J Aust. 2018 Jun 18;208(11):471-472
pubmed: 29902400
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):836-51
pubmed: 14516248
Health Syst Reform. 2017 Jul 3;3(3):236-247
pubmed: 31514669
Prev Med. 2000 Sep;31(3):249-60
pubmed: 10964639
Soc Sci Med. 1997 Sep;45(5):649-57
pubmed: 9226788
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Apr;13(2):108-14
pubmed: 15069217
Health (London). 2006 Apr;10(2):233-51
pubmed: 16513662
Health Place. 2004 Jun;10(2):117-28
pubmed: 15019906
CMAJ. 2010 Sep 21;182(13):E645-6
pubmed: 20732979
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Sep;90(5):980-90
pubmed: 16162070
Int J Pharm Pract. 2010 Oct;18(5):260-8
pubmed: 20840681
JAMA. 2018 Mar 20;319(11):1113-1124
pubmed: 29558552