Fit for purpose? OrganisationaL prOdUctivity and woRkforce wellbeIng in workSpaces in Hospital (FLOURISH): a multimethod qualitative study protocol.


Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 04 2019
Historique:
entrez: 22 4 2019
pubmed: 22 4 2019
medline: 10 5 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Workspaces are socially constructed environments where social relationships are produced, reproduced, challenged and transformed. Their primary function is to support high-quality service delivery to the benefit of 'patients'. They are also settings where employees can work effectively, in a safe and healthy environment, delivering a high-quality service according to a 'Work-As-Done' rather than a 'Work-As-Imagined' model. However, hospital design is currently based on a managerial understanding of work accomplishments, often falling short of understanding what is actually happening on the ground. Furthermore, the research landscape lacks rigorous assessment of these complex sociological and health research concepts, either within the Australian context where this protocol is set, or internationally.This paper describes an innovative protocol aimed at examining healthcare employees' and organisations' concerns and beliefs in workspace design. It outlines research investigating the effect of workspace use on productivity, health and safety and worker satisfaction, to clarify Work-As-Done, while creating healthy and more fulfilling environments. This is a proof-of-concept study, taking place between June 2018 and April 2019, employing a multimethod, qualitative approach for in-depth assessment of one Australian, private, university hospital environment, using as its 'case' the Gastroenterology Surgical Unit. It involves (1) observations and informal interviews (shadowing) with employees and patients as they traverse hospital spaces and (2) visual data of spatial use. Fieldnotes will be analysed thematically, and visual data analysed using a predefined schematic framework (a visual taxonomy). Overarching themes and categories will be considered corroboratively, mixing visual and textual data to build an iterative and dynamic picture. Ethical considerations will be discussed, while approval has been granted by the University's Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/5201800282), along with Governance approved by the Health Clinical Research Executive (CRG2018005). Study results will be disseminated through publications, research conferences and public reports.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31005940
pii: bmjopen-2018-027636
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027636
pmc: PMC6500262
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e027636

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: JC is an employee of the case site and will not, therefore, be involved in data analysis.

Références

BMJ. 2016 May 03;353:i2139
pubmed: 27143499
Arch Surg. 1999 Sep;134(9):1011-6
pubmed: 10487599
Health Place. 2009 Mar;15(1):315-22
pubmed: 18675577
Qual Health Res. 2003 Jan;13(1):77-99
pubmed: 12564264
Health Place. 2007 Jun;13(2):532-44
pubmed: 16996775
BMJ. 2004 May 8;328(7448):1115-8
pubmed: 15130981
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Nov;65(9):1825-38
pubmed: 17706331
Health Place. 1997 Sep;3(3):171-80
pubmed: 10670968
Med J Aust. 2018 Jun 18;208(11):471-472
pubmed: 29902400
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):836-51
pubmed: 14516248
Health Syst Reform. 2017 Jul 3;3(3):236-247
pubmed: 31514669
Prev Med. 2000 Sep;31(3):249-60
pubmed: 10964639
Soc Sci Med. 1997 Sep;45(5):649-57
pubmed: 9226788
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Apr;13(2):108-14
pubmed: 15069217
Health (London). 2006 Apr;10(2):233-51
pubmed: 16513662
Health Place. 2004 Jun;10(2):117-28
pubmed: 15019906
CMAJ. 2010 Sep 21;182(13):E645-6
pubmed: 20732979
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Sep;90(5):980-90
pubmed: 16162070
Int J Pharm Pract. 2010 Oct;18(5):260-8
pubmed: 20840681
JAMA. 2018 Mar 20;319(11):1113-1124
pubmed: 29558552

Auteurs

Frances Rapport (F)

Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Emilie Auton (E)

Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

John Cartmill (J)

Macquarie University Hospital, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia.

Jeffrey Braithwaite (J)

Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Patti Shih (P)

Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Anne Hogden (A)

Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Robyn Clay-Williams (R)

Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH