Cluster analysis to define distinct clinical phenotypes among septic patients with bloodstream infections.
Journal
Medicine
ISSN: 1536-5964
Titre abrégé: Medicine (Baltimore)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985248R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
entrez:
23
4
2019
pubmed:
23
4
2019
medline:
8
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Prior attempts at identifying outcome determinants associated with bloodstream infection have employed a priori determined classification schemes based on readily identifiable microbiology, infection site, and patient characteristics. We hypothesized that even amongst this heterogeneous population, clinically relevant groupings can be described that transcend old a priori classifications.We applied cluster analysis to variables from three domains: patient characteristics, acuity of illness/clinical presentation and infection characteristics. We validated our clusters based on both content validity and predictive validity.Among 3715 patients with bloodstream infections from Barnes-Jewish Hospital (2008-2015), the most stable cluster arrangement occurred with the formation of 4 clusters. This clustering arrangement resulted in an approximately uniform distribution of the population: Cluster One "Surgical Outside Hospital Transfers" (21.5%), Cluster Two "Functional Immunocompromised Patients" (27.9%), Cluster Three "Women with Skin and Urinary Tract Infection" (28.7%) and Cluster Four "Acutely Sick Pneumonia" (21.8%). Staphylococcus aureus distributed primarily to Clusters Three (40%) and Four (25%), while nonfermenting Gram-negative bacteria grouped mainly in Clusters Two and Four (31% and 30%). More than half of the pneumonia cases occurred in Cluster Four. Clusters One and Two contained 33% and 31% respectively of the individuals receiving inappropriate antibiotic administration. Mortality was greatest for Cluster Four (33.8%, 27.4%, 19.2%, 44.6%; P < .001), while Cluster One patients were most likely to be discharged to a nursing home.Our results support the potential for machine learning methods to identify homogenous groupings in infectious diseases that transcend old a priori classifications. These methods may allow new clinical phenotypes to be identified potentially improving the severity staging and development of new treatments for complex infectious diseases.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31008972
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015276
pii: 00005792-201904190-00053
pmc: PMC6494365
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e15276Références
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Feb 15;181(4):315-23
pubmed: 19892860
Bioinformatics. 2010 Jun 15;26(12):1572-3
pubmed: 20427518
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Apr 12;7(8):
pubmed: 29650709
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018 Mar;51(3):407-412
pubmed: 29122697
Fed Regist. 2015 Aug 17;80(158):49325-886
pubmed: 26292371
Virulence. 2016 Apr 2;7(3):280-97
pubmed: 27002635
Infect Dis (Lond). 2018 Mar;50(3):175-192
pubmed: 29105519
Infection. 2017 Oct;45(5):613-620
pubmed: 28478600
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Jan 6;66(1):149-153
pubmed: 29020316
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Feb 15;60(4):539-48
pubmed: 25378459
J Infect. 2011 Feb;62(2):130-5
pubmed: 21195110
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Jul 15;194(2):139-41
pubmed: 27167169
BMC Bioinformatics. 2018 Jan 08;19(1):9
pubmed: 29310570
Crit Care Med. 2015 Aug;43(8):1580-6
pubmed: 25855900
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Jun 1;66(12):1978-1979
pubmed: 29365087
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Dec;24(12):1264-1272
pubmed: 29581049
Brief Bioinform. 2019 Mar 25;20(2):572-584
pubmed: 29659698
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Jan 6;66(2):172-177
pubmed: 29190320
Lancet. 2015 Mar 7;385(9971):857-66
pubmed: 25684586
Clin Chest Med. 2017 Sep;38(3):493-509
pubmed: 28797491
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 4;372(23):2243-57
pubmed: 26014596
Psychol Med. 2018 Dec;48(16):2717-2729
pubmed: 29679991
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018 Jan;15(1):33-41
pubmed: 28910142
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Jan 25;62(2):
pubmed: 29203479
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2015 Dec;16(6):785-93
pubmed: 26258265
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Oct 21;60(11):6673-6678
pubmed: 27572416
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Aug;95(35):e4708
pubmed: 27583907
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 29;376(26):2507-2509
pubmed: 28657867