Keratinocyte cancer excisions in Australia: Who performs them and associated costs.


Journal

The Australasian journal of dermatology
ISSN: 1440-0960
Titre abrégé: Australas J Dermatol
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 0135232

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Historique:
received: 14 01 2019
accepted: 24 03 2019
pubmed: 24 4 2019
medline: 14 4 2020
entrez: 24 4 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To describe the clinical settings in which keratinocyte cancers are excised in Queensland and describe the types of practitioners who excise them; to examine costs; and to identify predictors of hospital admission. We used linked data for participants from the QSkin study (n = 43 794), including Medicare claims and Queensland hospital admissions relating to treatment episodes for incident keratinocyte cancers from July 2011 to June 2015. We used multinomial logistic regression to measure associations between demographic and clinical characteristics and treatment setting. The median costs of Medicare claims (AU$) were calculated. During 4 years of follow-up, there were 18 479 skin cancer excision episodes among 8613 people. Most excisions took place in private clinical rooms (89.7%), the remainder in hospitals (7.9% private; 2.4% public). Compared with other anatomical sites, skin cancers on the nose, eyelid, ear, lip, finger or genitalia were more likely to be treated in hospitals than in private clinical rooms (public hospital OR 5.7; 95%CI 4.5-7.2; private hospital OR 8.3; 95%CI 7.3-9.4). Primary care practitioners excised 83% of keratinocyte cancers, followed by plastic surgeons (9%) and dermatologists (6%). The median Medicare benefit paid was $253 in private clinical rooms and $334 in private hospitals. Out-of-pocket payments by patients treated in private hospitals were fourfold higher than those in private clinical rooms ($351 vs $80). Most keratinocyte cancers are excised in primary care, although more than 10% of excisions occur in hospital settings.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To describe the clinical settings in which keratinocyte cancers are excised in Queensland and describe the types of practitioners who excise them; to examine costs; and to identify predictors of hospital admission.
METHODS METHODS
We used linked data for participants from the QSkin study (n = 43 794), including Medicare claims and Queensland hospital admissions relating to treatment episodes for incident keratinocyte cancers from July 2011 to June 2015. We used multinomial logistic regression to measure associations between demographic and clinical characteristics and treatment setting. The median costs of Medicare claims (AU$) were calculated.
RESULTS RESULTS
During 4 years of follow-up, there were 18 479 skin cancer excision episodes among 8613 people. Most excisions took place in private clinical rooms (89.7%), the remainder in hospitals (7.9% private; 2.4% public). Compared with other anatomical sites, skin cancers on the nose, eyelid, ear, lip, finger or genitalia were more likely to be treated in hospitals than in private clinical rooms (public hospital OR 5.7; 95%CI 4.5-7.2; private hospital OR 8.3; 95%CI 7.3-9.4). Primary care practitioners excised 83% of keratinocyte cancers, followed by plastic surgeons (9%) and dermatologists (6%). The median Medicare benefit paid was $253 in private clinical rooms and $334 in private hospitals. Out-of-pocket payments by patients treated in private hospitals were fourfold higher than those in private clinical rooms ($351 vs $80).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Most keratinocyte cancers are excised in primary care, although more than 10% of excisions occur in hospital settings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31012087
doi: 10.1111/ajd.13056
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

294-300

Subventions

Organisme : National Health and Medical Research Council
ID : 552429

Informations de copyright

© 2019 The Australasian College of Dermatologists.

Références

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Skin Cancer in Australia. Canberra, ACT: AIHW, 2016.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cancer in Australia 2017. Cancer series no.101. Canberra, ACT: AIHW, 2017.
Pandeya N, Olsen CM, Whiteman DC. The incidence and multiplicity rates of keratinocyte cancers in Australia. Med. J. Aust. 2017; 207: 339-43.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Health System Expenditure on Cancer and Other Neoplasms in Australia: 2008-09. Cancer series no. 81. Cat. no. 78. Canberra, ACT: AIHW, 2013.
Askew DA, Wilkinson D, Schluter PJ et al. Skin cancer surgery in Australia 2001-2005: the changing role of the general practitioner. Med. J. Aust. 2007; 187: 210-4.
Clarke P. Nonmelanoma skin cancers - treatment options. Aust. Fam. Physician 2012; 41: 476-80.
Skin Cancer College Australasia. Available from URL: https://www.skincancercollege.org/. (Accessed 5 March 2019.)
Youl PH, Baade PD, Janda M et al. Diagnosing skin cancer in primary care: how do mainstream general practitioners compare with primary care skin cancer clinic doctors? Med. J. Aust. 2007; 187: 215-20.
Referring and requesting Medicare services. Available from URL: https://www.humanservices.gov.au/organisations/health-professionals/subjects/referring-and-requesting-medicare-services. (Accessed 5 March 2019.)
Australian Cancer Network Working Party. Basal Cell Carcinoma, Squamous Cell Carcinoma (and Related Lesions) - A Guide to Clinical Management in Australia. Sydney, NSW: Cancer Council Australia and Australian Cancer Network, 2008.
National Cancer Control Initiative. The 2002 National Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer Survey. A Report by the NCCI Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer Working Group. Edited by Staples MP. Melbourne, Vic.: NCCI, 2003.
Olsen CM, Green AC, Neale RE et al. Cohort profile: the QSkin sun and health study. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2012; 41: 929-i.
Thompson BS, Olsen CM, Subramaniam P et al. Medicare claims data reliably identify treatments for basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective cohort study. Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health 2016; 40: 154-8.
State of Queensland (Queensland Health). Queensland Hospital Admitted Patient Data Collection (QHAPDC) Manual 2015-2016 collection year 2015. Available from URL: https://www.health.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0023/392432/1516-qhapdcmanual-final-v1.0.pdf. (Accessed 20 February 2018.)
Chen GJ, Yelverton CB, Polisetty SS et al. Treatment patterns and cost of nonmelanoma skin cancer management. Dermatol. Surg. 2006; 32: 1266-71.
Chirikov VV, Stuart B, Zuckerman IH et al. Physician specialty cost differences of treating nonmelanoma skin cancer. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2015; 74: 93-9.
Rogers HW, Coldiron BM. Analysis of skin cancer treatment and costs in the United States medicare population, 1996-2008. Dermatol. Surg. 2013; 39: 35-42.
Australian Bureau of Statistics 2014, Population Estimates by Remoteness Area, 2003 to 2013, ‘Table 1: Estimated Residents Population, Remoteness Areas, Australia’, data cube: Excel spreadsheet, cat. no. 3218.0. Available from URL: http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/3218.02012-13?OpenDocument. (Accessed 27 February 2019.)
Fransen M, Karahalios A, Sharma N et al. Non-melanoma skin cancer in Australia. Med. J. Aust. 2012; 197: 565-8.
Gordon LG, Elliott TM, Olsen CM et al. Multiplicity of skin cancers in Queensland and their cost burden to government and patients. Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health 2018; 42: 86-91.
Marks MM, Yelverton CB, Williford PM et al. A Medicare cost comparison of minor cutaneous procedures by surgical setting. J. Dermatolog. Treat. 2010; 21: 101-6.
Gordon LG, Rodriguez-Acevedo AJ, Papier K et al. The effects of a multidisciplinary high-throughput skin clinic on healthcare costs of organ transplant recipients. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2019; (Epub ahead of print). https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15458.
Housman TS, Williford PM, Feldman SR et al. Nonmelanoma skin cancer: an episode of care management approach. Dermatol. Surg. 2003; 29: 700-11.
Eide MJ, Krajenta R, Johnson D et al. Identification of patients with nonmelanoma skin cancer using health maintenance organization claims data. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2010; 171: 123-8.

Auteurs

Bridie S Thompson (BS)

Department of Population Health, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

Nirmala Pandeya (N)

Department of Population Health, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Catherine M Olsen (CM)

Department of Population Health, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Faculty of Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Jean Claude Dusingize (JC)

Department of Population Health, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

Adele C Green (AC)

Department of Population Health, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute and University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Rachel E Neale (RE)

Department of Population Health, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

David C Whiteman (DC)

Department of Population Health, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH