Platelet-rich plasma versus lidocaine as tenotomy adjuvants in people with elbow epicondylopathy: a randomized controlled trial.
Elbow tendinopathy
Epicondylitis
Function
Lateral
Medial
Pain
Platelet-rich plasma
Randomized controlled study
Sonography
Tenotomy
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
ISSN: 1749-799X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Surg Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265112
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Apr 2019
23 Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
16
11
2018
accepted:
12
04
2019
entrez:
25
4
2019
pubmed:
25
4
2019
medline:
4
9
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To determine the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) compared to lidocaine as a tenotomy adjuvant for people with elbow tendinopathy. Our study was a parallel-group, double-blind, randomized trial involving 71 patients with recalcitrant elbow tendinopathy who received two sessions of ultrasound-guided tenotomy with either PRP or lidocaine in a tertiary public hospital. The primary end point was the percentage of patients with an improvement exceeding 25% reduction in disability (Spanish version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaires-DASH-E) at 6 and 12 months; the secondary outcome was the percentage of patients exceeding 25% reduction in pain (VAS-P). There was no evidence of significant differences in the proportion of patients who experienced clinically relevant improvements. After 6 months, 18 patients (78.59%) in the lidocaine group and 19 patients (73.08%) in the PRP group showed improved function above 25% (unadjusted odds ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90 (0.17 to 4.60)); 21 patients (72.21%) in the lidocaine group versus 22 patients (84.62%) in the PRP group achieved more than 25% pain reduction (unadjusted odds ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.10 to 2.37). After 12 months, 17 patients (70.83%) in the lidocaine group versus 19 patients (76%) in the PRP group had improved function (unadjusted odds ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.13 to 3.84), and 19 patients (76%) in the lidocaine group versus 20 patients (90.91%) in the PRP group had improved pain above 25% (unadjusted odds ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.06 to 2.51). Hypercholesterolemia and baseline vascularization influenced outcomes. There were no differences between groups in the adjusted odds ratios. PRP results in similar improvements to those obtained with lidocaine. Selecting patients according to their pretreatment status can improve treatment efficacy. NCT01945528 , EudraCT 2013-000478-32. Registered 18 August 2013, enrolment of the first participant 10 March 2014.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31014382
doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1153-6
pii: 10.1186/s13018-019-1153-6
pmc: PMC6480601
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anesthetics, Local
0
Lidocaine
98PI200987
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01945528']
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
109Subventions
Organisme : Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES)
ID : PI13/01707
Références
Am J Epidemiol. 2006 Dec 1;164(11):1065-74
pubmed: 16968862
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):255-62
pubmed: 20448192
Br J Sports Med. 2011 Sep;45(12):966-71
pubmed: 21406450
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Oct;39(10):2130-4
pubmed: 21813443
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Oct;199(4):W501-5
pubmed: 22997400
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Mar;41(3):625-35
pubmed: 23328738
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;42(2):463-71
pubmed: 23825183
Skeletal Radiol. 2013 Nov;42(11):1515-20
pubmed: 23912197
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Jan;44(1):30-9
pubmed: 24175606
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2014 Jan 1;116(1):54-60
pubmed: 24177691
Trials. 2013 Dec 01;14:410
pubmed: 24289799
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar 18;6:12
pubmed: 24635909
Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2014 May 08;4(1):3-9
pubmed: 24932440
Med Clin North Am. 2014 Jul;98(4):833-49, xiii
pubmed: 24994055
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014 Oct;38(5):1017-23
pubmed: 25099499
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Dec;42(12):2888-96
pubmed: 25296645
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 May;473(5):1624-34
pubmed: 25670657
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2015 Apr;23(1):6-10
pubmed: 25920634
Int Orthop. 2015 Nov;39(11):2199-203
pubmed: 26224613
Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2015 Jul 03;5(2):92-8
pubmed: 26261787
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Dec;135(12):1637-45
pubmed: 26318887
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Feb;55(2):279-85
pubmed: 26350485
Cells Tissues Organs. 2015;200(6):394-404
pubmed: 26562323
Phys Ther Sport. 2016 Jan;17:87-94
pubmed: 26621224
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Nov;68(11):1681-1687
pubmed: 26946473
Rev Bras Ortop. 2016 Jan 13;51(1):90-5
pubmed: 26962506
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Aug;44(8):1952-61
pubmed: 27161868
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jan;45(1):226-233
pubmed: 27268111
PM R. 2017 Jun;9(6):603-611
pubmed: 27780771
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2016 Nov;20(5):414-421
pubmed: 28002863
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2017 Mar;16(3):341-349
pubmed: 28005449
J Sports Sci Med. 2017 Mar 1;16(1):1-5
pubmed: 28344444
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2017 Jun 1;17(2):97-103
pubmed: 28574416
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2017 Nov 6;3(1):e000237
pubmed: 29177072
Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Dec 06;5(12):2325967117742077
pubmed: 29238734
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jul;46(8):2020-2032
pubmed: 29268037
HSS J. 2018 Feb;14(1):9-14
pubmed: 29398988
J Thromb Haemost. 2018 Sep;16(9):1895-1900
pubmed: 30099839