Associations between family structure and young people's physical activity and screen time behaviors.


Journal

BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Apr 2019
Historique:
received: 26 05 2018
accepted: 02 04 2019
entrez: 27 4 2019
pubmed: 27 4 2019
medline: 27 6 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Identifying factors that can influence young peoples' physical activity and sedentary behaviors is important for the development of effective interventions. The family structure in which children grow up may be one such factor. As the prevalence of single parent and reconstituted families have increased substantially over the last decades, the objective of this study was to examine whether these family structures are differentially associated with young people's MVPA, participation in organized sports and screen-time activities (screen-based passive entertainment, gaming, other screen-based activities) as compared to traditional nuclear families. The data stem from the 2013/2014 "Health Behaviour in School- aged Children (HBSC) study". A large Norwegian sample of 11-16 years old students (n = 4509) participated. Cluster-adjusted regression models were estimated using full information maximum likelihood with robust standard errors (MLR). After adjusting for covariates, living with a single parent was negatively associated with days/week with 60 min MVPA (b = -.39, 95%CI: -.58, -.20), and positively associated with hours/weekday of total screen time (b = .50, 95%CI: .08, .93). Young people living with a single parent were also more likely to report no participation in organized sports (OR = 1.40, 95%CI: 1.09, 1.79). Living in a reconstituted family was negatively associated with days/week with 60 min MVPA (b = -.31, 95%CI: -.53, -.08), and positively associated with hours/weekday of total screen time (b = .85, 95%CI: .37, 1.33). For all outcomes, the interaction effects of family structure with sex, and with having siblings were not statistically significant. For material affluence, a significant interaction effect was found for participation in organized sports (χ This study suggests that living with a single parent or in reconstituted families was unfavorably associated with physical activity, sport participation and screen-based behaviors among Norwegian youth. The findings indicate that family structure could be an important factor to take into account in the development and testing of interventions. More in-depth research is needed to identify the mechanisms involved.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Identifying factors that can influence young peoples' physical activity and sedentary behaviors is important for the development of effective interventions. The family structure in which children grow up may be one such factor. As the prevalence of single parent and reconstituted families have increased substantially over the last decades, the objective of this study was to examine whether these family structures are differentially associated with young people's MVPA, participation in organized sports and screen-time activities (screen-based passive entertainment, gaming, other screen-based activities) as compared to traditional nuclear families.
METHODS METHODS
The data stem from the 2013/2014 "Health Behaviour in School- aged Children (HBSC) study". A large Norwegian sample of 11-16 years old students (n = 4509) participated. Cluster-adjusted regression models were estimated using full information maximum likelihood with robust standard errors (MLR).
RESULTS RESULTS
After adjusting for covariates, living with a single parent was negatively associated with days/week with 60 min MVPA (b = -.39, 95%CI: -.58, -.20), and positively associated with hours/weekday of total screen time (b = .50, 95%CI: .08, .93). Young people living with a single parent were also more likely to report no participation in organized sports (OR = 1.40, 95%CI: 1.09, 1.79). Living in a reconstituted family was negatively associated with days/week with 60 min MVPA (b = -.31, 95%CI: -.53, -.08), and positively associated with hours/weekday of total screen time (b = .85, 95%CI: .37, 1.33). For all outcomes, the interaction effects of family structure with sex, and with having siblings were not statistically significant. For material affluence, a significant interaction effect was found for participation in organized sports (χ
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
This study suggests that living with a single parent or in reconstituted families was unfavorably associated with physical activity, sport participation and screen-based behaviors among Norwegian youth. The findings indicate that family structure could be an important factor to take into account in the development and testing of interventions. More in-depth research is needed to identify the mechanisms involved.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31023280
doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6740-2
pii: 10.1186/s12889-019-6740-2
pmc: PMC6482570
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

433

Références

Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999 Aug;23(8):904-8
pubmed: 10490794
Prev Med. 1999 Oct;29(4):305-12
pubmed: 10547056
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 May;32(5):963-75
pubmed: 10795788
BMJ. 2000 May 6;320(7244):1240-3
pubmed: 10797032
Pediatrics. 2000 Jul;106(1 Pt 1):52-8
pubmed: 10878149
Arch Dis Child. 2000 Oct;83(4):289-92
pubmed: 10999857
Ann Behav Med. 2000 Fall;22(4):294-8
pubmed: 11253440
Public Health Nutr. 2002 Aug;5(4):561-5
pubmed: 12186665
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2002 Oct;26(5):473-8
pubmed: 12413294
J Adolesc Health. 2003 Apr;32(4):281-7
pubmed: 12667732
Acta Paediatr. 2004 Jul;93(7):982-8
pubmed: 15303817
Int J Behav Med. 2004;11(3):152-63
pubmed: 15496343
J Sch Health. 2004 Nov;74(9):370-7
pubmed: 15656264
Psychol Rep. 2004 Dec;95(3 Pt 1):851-8
pubmed: 15666918
Obes Res. 2005 Nov;13(11):1939-51
pubmed: 16339126
Int J Obes (Lond). 2005 Sep;29 Suppl 2:S84-96
pubmed: 16385758
Sports Med. 2006;36(1):79-97
pubmed: 16445312
Public Health Nutr. 2006 Apr;9(2):244-50
pubmed: 16571179
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006 May;38(5):910-8
pubmed: 16672845
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006 Oct 25;3:36
pubmed: 17062166
Obes Rev. 2007 Mar;8(2):129-54
pubmed: 17300279
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Sep;39(9):1493-500
pubmed: 17805079
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2009 Oct;19(5):646-54
pubmed: 18694430
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009 Jun 11;6:33
pubmed: 19519913
Int J Pediatr Obes. 2010;5(1):3-18
pubmed: 19562608
Acad Pediatr. 2009 Sep-Oct;9(5):300-6
pubmed: 19592321
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010 May;42(5):1022-8
pubmed: 19996991
Prev Med. 2010 Jul;51(1):50-5
pubmed: 20359491
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011 Aug;21(4):606-11
pubmed: 20459468
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 May 11;7:40
pubmed: 20459784
Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2010 Jul;38(3):105-13
pubmed: 20577058
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Aug 10;10:73
pubmed: 20696078
Soc Sci Res. 2010 Sep;39(5):814-30
pubmed: 20824195
Health Educ Res. 2011 Feb;26(1):63-76
pubmed: 21059801
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Jan 02;8:1
pubmed: 21194492
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011 Feb;36(1):59-64; 65-71
pubmed: 21326378
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Aug;41(2):197-206
pubmed: 21767728
Br J Sports Med. 2011 Sep;45(11):896-905
pubmed: 21836173
J Sci Med Sport. 2012 Mar;15(2):136-41
pubmed: 22051688
Soc Forces. 2012 Sep;91(1):45-53
pubmed: 23378674
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Aug 15;10:98
pubmed: 23945179
Br J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;48(3):182-6
pubmed: 24347578
J Pediatr. 2014 Jun;164(6):1469-74
pubmed: 24657117
BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 04;4(6):e004502
pubmed: 24898085
BMC Public Health. 2015 May 19;15:497
pubmed: 25986730
PeerJ. 2015 Jun 25;3:e1048
pubmed: 26137429
Ann Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;25(12):907-11.e1-2
pubmed: 26385831
Int J Public Health. 2016 Apr;61(3):329-36
pubmed: 26450577
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Oct 09;12:133
pubmed: 26453175
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jan 22;16:58
pubmed: 26795731
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 10;11(2):e0147403
pubmed: 26863108
Child Indic Res. 2016;9:233-245
pubmed: 26925177
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:4278682
pubmed: 27123446
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2018 Jul 27;4(1):e000405
pubmed: 30364499

Auteurs

Amund Langøy (A)

NLA University College, Bergen, Pb 74 Sandviken, 5812, Bergen, Norway.

Otto R F Smith (ORF)

Department of Health Promotion, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Zander Kaaesgate 7, 5015, Bergen, Norway.

Bente Wold (B)

Department of Health Promotion and Development, University of Bergen, Christiesgate 13, 5020, Bergen, Norway.

Oddrun Samdal (O)

Department of Health Promotion and Development, University of Bergen, Christiesgate 13, 5020, Bergen, Norway.

Ellen M Haug (EM)

NLA University College, Bergen, Pb 74 Sandviken, 5812, Bergen, Norway. Ellen.haug@uib.no.
Department of Health Promotion and Development, University of Bergen, Christiesgate 13, 5020, Bergen, Norway. Ellen.haug@uib.no.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH