Is it possible to use interpretative phenomenological analysis in research with people who have intellectual disabilities?

Humans Intellectual Disability Persons with Mental Disabilities Qualitative Research
intellectual disabilities interpretative phenomenological analysis learning disabilities qualitative research quality

Journal

Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID
ISSN: 1468-3148
Titre abrégé: J Appl Res Intellect Disabil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9613616

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Historique:
received: 20 06 2018
revised: 01 03 2019
accepted: 02 04 2019
pubmed: 30 4 2019
medline: 1 2 2020
entrez: 30 4 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This paper examines the appropriateness of using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) in research with people who have intellectual disabilities, focussing on quality. We conducted a systematic search to identify published studies. We assessed the quality of the studies using a bespoke framework, adapted from previous reviews, and articles on indicators of "good" IPA work. Twenty-eight papers were reviewed. The studies were of varying quality: 6 (22%) papers were rated as "good" quality; 16 (57%) were "acceptable", and 6 (21%) were "poor." This ratio was comparable to that found in assessments of IPA papers in other domains, suggesting that issues of quality reflect researcher competence, rather than challenges with the population. IPA can be an appropriate methodology to use with people with intellectual disabilities. We encourage researchers to develop more detailed analyses, to provide more transparency about their sampling strategies, and more detail of the characteristics of their samples.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
This paper examines the appropriateness of using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) in research with people who have intellectual disabilities, focussing on quality.
METHODS METHODS
We conducted a systematic search to identify published studies. We assessed the quality of the studies using a bespoke framework, adapted from previous reviews, and articles on indicators of "good" IPA work.
RESULTS RESULTS
Twenty-eight papers were reviewed. The studies were of varying quality: 6 (22%) papers were rated as "good" quality; 16 (57%) were "acceptable", and 6 (21%) were "poor." This ratio was comparable to that found in assessments of IPA papers in other domains, suggesting that issues of quality reflect researcher competence, rather than challenges with the population.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
IPA can be an appropriate methodology to use with people with intellectual disabilities. We encourage researchers to develop more detailed analyses, to provide more transparency about their sampling strategies, and more detail of the characteristics of their samples.

Identifiants

DOI: 10.1111/jar.12605 PMID: 31033103
pubmed: 31033103
doi: 10.1111/jar.12605
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1007-1017

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Auteurs

John Rose (J)

Centre for Applied Psychology, School of Psychology, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Academic Unit, St Andrews Health Care, Northampton, UK.
ORCID: 0000-0003-2672-9767

Kulsoom Malik (K)

Centre for Applied Psychology, School of Psychology, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Edward Hirata (E)

Centre for Applied Psychology, School of Psychology, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Harry Roughan (H)

Centre for Applied Psychology, School of Psychology, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Kirsty Aston (K)

Centre for Applied Psychology, School of Psychology, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Michael Larkin (M)

Centre for Applied Psychology, School of Psychology, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Aston University, Birmingham, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female

Evaluation of Low-Value Services Across Major Medicare Advantage Insurers and Traditional Medicare.

Ciara Duggan, Adam L Beckman, Ishani Ganguli et al.
1.00
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C

Effectiveness of Virtual Yoga for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Hallie Tankha, Devyn Gaskins, Amanda Shallcross et al.
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH

questionsmedicales.fr › Eucaryotes › Animaux › Chordés › Vertébrés › Mammifères › Eutheria › Primates › Haplorhini › Catarrhini › Hominidae › Humains › Is it possible to use interpretative...
questionsmedicales.fr › Troubles mentaux › Troubles du développement neurologique › Déficience intellectuelle › Is it possible to use interpretative...
questionsmedicales.fr › Personnes › Personnes handicapées › Personnes handicapées mentales › Is it possible to use interpretative...
questionsmedicales.fr › Disciplines des sciences naturelles › Science › Recherche › Recherche empirique › Recherche qualitative › Is it possible to use interpretative...