Effect of physostigmine on recovery from septic shock following intra-abdominal infection - Results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, monocentric pilot trial (Anticholium® per Se).
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Critical Care
/ methods
Double-Blind Method
Female
Humans
Intraabdominal Infections
/ drug therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Norepinephrine
/ therapeutic use
Organ Dysfunction Scores
Patient Safety
Perioperative Period
Physostigmine
/ administration & dosage
Pilot Projects
Sepsis
/ drug therapy
Shock, Septic
/ drug therapy
Sodium Chloride
/ administration & dosage
Young Adult
Adjunctive therapy
Antilirium
Cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway
Cholinesterase inhibitor
Perioperative sepsis
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score
Journal
Journal of critical care
ISSN: 1557-8615
Titre abrégé: J Crit Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8610642
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2019
08 2019
Historique:
received:
19
01
2019
revised:
02
04
2019
accepted:
07
04
2019
pubmed:
30
4
2019
medline:
21
7
2020
entrez:
30
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway has been shown to be accessible by physostigmine salicylate in animal models. However, the cholinesterase inhibitor is not approved for adjunctive therapy in sepsis, and tolerability and safety of high initial doses followed by continuous infusion have not been investigated. In this trial, 20 patients with perioperative septic shock due to intra-abdominal infection were eligible. The physostigmine group received an initial dose of 0.04 mg/kg physostigmine salicylate, followed by continuous infusion of 1 mg/h for 120 h; the placebo group was treated with 0.9% sodium chloride. Primary outcome was the mean Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score during treatment and up to 14 days. Administration of physostigmine salicylate was well tolerated. Mean SOFA scores were 8.9 ± 2.5 and 11.3 ± 3.6 (mean ± SD) for physostigmine and placebo group, respectively. Adjusted for age, difference between means was not statistically significant (-2.37, 95% CI: -5.43 to 0.70, p = 0.121). Norepinephrine doses required only appeared lower in the physostigmine group (p = 0.064), along with a more rapid reduction from an elevated heart rate possibly indicating less hemodynamic instability. Treatment with physostigmine salicylate was feasible and safe. Further studies are justified to assess the effect on recovery from septic shock. EudraCT Number 2012-001650-26, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03013322.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31035187
pii: S0883-9441(19)30098-X
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.04.012
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
physostigmine salicylate
2046ZRO9VU
Sodium Chloride
451W47IQ8X
Physostigmine
9U1VM840SP
Norepinephrine
X4W3ENH1CV
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03013322']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
126-135Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.