Association of p53 expression with poor prognosis in patients with triple-negative breast invasive ductal carcinoma.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biomarkers, Tumor
Carcinoma, Ductal
/ mortality
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Genes, p53
/ physiology
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Grading
Neoplasm Invasiveness
Neoplasm Staging
Prognosis
Proportional Hazards Models
Retrospective Studies
Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms
/ mortality
Tumor Suppressor Protein p53
/ genetics
Journal
Medicine
ISSN: 1536-5964
Titre abrégé: Medicine (Baltimore)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985248R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2019
May 2019
Historique:
entrez:
3
5
2019
pubmed:
3
5
2019
medline:
29
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
TP53 gene is mutated in approximately 80% of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the prognostic significance of immunohistochemical (IHC)-detected p53 protein expression remains controversial in TNBC. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the association between IHC-detected p53 expression and the prognosis in a cohort of 278 patients with stage I-III triple-negative breast invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), who received surgery at the department of breast surgery in the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from 2010-01 to 2012-12. We found a positive expression ratio of IHC-detected p53 in triple-negative breast IDC of 58.6% (163/278). Furthermore, levels of expression were significantly associated with vessel tumor emboli and higher histologic grade (P = .038, P = .043, respectively), with the highest expression level observed in G3 breast cancer (64.7%). Additionally, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that p53 expression indicated worse overall survival (OS) in the whole cohort (79.6% vs 89.6%, Log-rank test P = .025) as well as in stratified prognostic stage II patients (90.8% vs 100%, Log-rank test P = .027). The mortality risk of p53 expression patients was 2.22 times higher than that of p53 negative patients (HR: 2.222; 95%CI: 1.147-4.308). In addition, p53 expression was also associated with poor disease-free survival (DFS) (76.7% vs 86.8%, P = .020). Cox proportional hazard ratio model showed p53 expression was an independent risk factor for OS (P = .018) and DFS (P = .018) after controlling for tumor size, lymph node status, and vessel tumor emboli. Altogether, our data showed that IHC-detected p53 expression is a promising prognostic candidate for poor survival in triple-negative breast IDC patients. However, more studies are needed to determine if p53 may be applied to clinical practice as a biomarker and/or novel therapeutic target for TNBC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31045815
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015449
pii: 00005792-201905030-00060
pmc: PMC6504250
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
TP53 protein, human
0
Tumor Suppressor Protein p53
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e15449Références
Cancer Lett. 2018 Feb 1;414:99-106
pubmed: 29069577
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Jul;152(2):255-69
pubmed: 26070269
Nat Rev Cancer. 2009 Oct;9(10):701-13
pubmed: 19693097
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015 Jul 01;8(7):8500-5
pubmed: 26339424
Cell Death Dis. 2017 Aug 10;8(8):e2995
pubmed: 28796261
Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Oct;48(4):1338-1350
pubmed: 26910472
Med Mol Morphol. 2016 Mar;49(1):11-21
pubmed: 26009308
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul;25(7):1783-1785
pubmed: 29671136
Acta Oncol. 2014 Oct;53(10):1347-55
pubmed: 24909504
Tumour Biol. 2016 Aug;37(8):11017-24
pubmed: 26894602
Sci Rep. 2013;3:2246
pubmed: 23873310
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2010 Apr;160(7-8):174-81
pubmed: 20473728
Trends Genet. 2012 Mar;28(3):128-36
pubmed: 22265392
J Clin Invest. 2014 Mar;124(3):1069-82
pubmed: 24487586
Int J Cancer. 2017 Jan 1;140(1):234-246
pubmed: 27615392
Nature. 2012 Oct 4;490(7418):61-70
pubmed: 23000897
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016 Nov;13(11):674-690
pubmed: 27184417
Breast Cancer Res. 2012 Nov 05;14(6):R143
pubmed: 23127292
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Nov;172(2):437-444
pubmed: 30132220
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010 Jul;134(7):e48-72
pubmed: 20586616
Nat Rev Cancer. 2018 Feb;18(2):128-134
pubmed: 29326430
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014 Feb;138(2):241-56
pubmed: 24099077
J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 20;30(15):1879-87
pubmed: 22454417
Nat Cell Biol. 2013 Jan;15(1):2-8
pubmed: 23263379
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2015;36(1):69-79
pubmed: 26076776
J Clin Med. 2016 Jul 14;5(7):
pubmed: 27429011
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Jul 1;20(13):3569-80
pubmed: 24803582
Hum Mutat. 2007 Jun;28(6):622-9
pubmed: 17311302
World J Surg Oncol. 2014 Aug 01;12:243
pubmed: 25082024
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jul;170(2):213-219
pubmed: 29564741
Nature. 2012 Apr 04;486(7403):395-9
pubmed: 22495314
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Feb;11(2):174-83
pubmed: 20152769
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Feb 15;20(4):782-90
pubmed: 24536073
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108
pubmed: 25651787
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2017 Jan 3;7(1):
pubmed: 27815305
Endocr Relat Cancer. 2006 Jun;13(2):293-325
pubmed: 16728565