Clinical impact of different exosomes' protein expression in pancreatic ductal carcinoma patients treated with standard first line palliative chemotherapy.
Adenocarcinoma
/ metabolism
Adult
Aged
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ blood
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal
/ genetics
Disease Progression
Disease-Free Survival
Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule
/ genetics
Exosomes
/ genetics
Female
Gene Expression
/ genetics
Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
/ genetics
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Middle Aged
Pancreatic Neoplasms
/ pathology
Prognosis
Transcriptome
/ genetics
Pancreatic Neoplasms
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
13
12
2018
accepted:
11
04
2019
entrez:
4
5
2019
pubmed:
3
5
2019
medline:
23
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is associated to dismal prognosis despite the use of palliative chemotherapy, partly due to the lack of knowledge of biological processes underlying disease progression. Exosomes have been identified as biomarkers sources in different cancer types. Aim of the study was to analyse the contents of circulating exosomes in patients with pancreatic cancer who received palliative chemotherapy. Patients were submitted to blood sample collection before chemotherapy (T0) and after 3 months (T3). We quantified by an ELISA-based technique specific proteins of cancer-derived exosomes (CD44,CD44v6,EpCAM,CD9,CD81,Tspan8,Integrin α6,Integrin β4,CD24,CXCR4). We correlated the baseline levels of these factors and changes between T3 and T0 and survival outcomes. Survival analyses were performed by Kaplan-Meier method. Correlation was assessed by log-rank test and level of statistical significance was set at 0.05. Multivariate analysis was performed by logistic regression analysis. Nineteen patients were enrolled. EpCAM T0 levels and increased EpCAM levels from T0 to T3 were those mostly associated with differences in survival. Patients having higher EpCAM had median progression free survival (PFS) of 3.18vs7.31 months (HR:2.82,95%CI:1.03-7.73,p = 0.01). Overall survival (OS) was shorter for patients having higher EpCAM (5.83vs16.45 months,HR:6.16,95%CI:1.93-19.58,p = 0.0001) and also response rates (RR) were worse (20%vs87%,p = 0.015). EpCAM increase during treatment was associated with better median PFS (2.88vs7.31 months,HR:0.24,95%CI:0.04-1.22,p = 0.003). OS was also better (8.75vs11.04 months, HR:0.77,95%CI:0.21-2.73,p = 0.66) and RR were 60%vs20% (p = 0.28). Among clinical factors that might determine changes on PFS and OS, only ECOG PS was associated to significantly worse PFS and OS (p = 0.0137and<0.001 respectively).Multivariate analysis confirmed EpCAM T0 levels and EpCAM T0/T3 changes as independent prognostic factors for PFS. Pancreatic cancer patients exosomes express EpCAM, whose levels change during treatment. This represents a useful prognostic factor and also suggests that future treatment modalities who target EpCAM should be tested in pancreatic cancer patients selected by exosome EpCAM expression.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31048929
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215990
pii: PONE-D-18-35647
pmc: PMC6497273
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
EPCAM protein, human
0
Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0215990Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Am J Pathol. 1996 Mar;148(3):865-75
pubmed: 8774141
Endosc Ultrasound. 2018 Nov-Dec;7(6):395-403
pubmed: 30246709
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Mar 20;18(3):
pubmed: 28335509
Int J Cancer. 2017 Jul 1;141(1):24-32
pubmed: 28133736
N Engl J Med. 2011 May 12;364(19):1817-25
pubmed: 21561347
Nature. 2015 Feb 26;518(7540):495-501
pubmed: 25719666
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 27;13(9):e0204276
pubmed: 30260987
Dig Liver Dis. 2016 Mar;48(3):223-30
pubmed: 26769569
Cancer Res. 2004 Aug 15;64(16):5818-24
pubmed: 15313925
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 10;8(1):11972
pubmed: 30097593
Pancreatology. 2018 Dec;18(8):862-867
pubmed: 30249386
Lancet. 2011 Aug 13;378(9791):607-20
pubmed: 21620466
BMC Cancer. 2011 Jan 31;11:47
pubmed: 21281486
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2013 Feb;40(2):143-7
pubmed: 23411950
Cancer Res. 2009 Apr 1;69(7):2887-95
pubmed: 19276366
Oncology. 2001;60(1):8-18
pubmed: 11150902
Lancet Oncol. 2005 Jun;6(6):369-76
pubmed: 15925814
Front Oncol. 2018 Mar 20;8:66
pubmed: 29616188
Int J Cancer. 2015 Jun 1;136(11):2616-27
pubmed: 25388097
Ann Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;29(1):223-229
pubmed: 29045505
Nat Cell Biol. 2009 Feb;11(2):162-71
pubmed: 19136966
Cancer Biol Ther. 2003 Jul-Aug;2(4):320-6
pubmed: 14508099
Med Phys. 2018 Nov;45(11):5208-5217
pubmed: 30198189
Anticancer Res. 2014 Sep;34(9):4741-6
pubmed: 25202052
J Cell Biochem. 2019 Jan;120(1):988-999
pubmed: 30160795
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jul 14;22(26):5971-6007
pubmed: 27468191
J Cancer. 2017 Feb 11;8(4):513-522
pubmed: 28367231
N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 31;369(18):1691-703
pubmed: 24131140