Ultra-Clean Pure Shift
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 05 2019
03 05 2019
Historique:
received:
07
02
2019
accepted:
23
04
2019
entrez:
5
5
2019
pubmed:
6
5
2019
medline:
21
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Even though Pure Shift NMR methods have conveniently been used in the assessment of crowded spectra, they are not commonly applied to the analysis of metabolomics data. This paper exploits the recently published SAPPHIRE-PSYCHE methodology in the context of plant metabolome. We compare single pulse, PSYCHE, and SAPPHIRE-PSYCHE spectra obtained from aqueous extracts of Physalis peruviana fruits. STOCSY analysis with simplified SAPPHIRE-PSYCHE spectra of six types of Cape gooseberry was carried out and the results attained compared with classical STOCSY data. PLS coefficients analysis combined with 1D-STOCSY was performed in an effort to simplify biomarker identification. Several of the most compromised proton NMR signals associated with critical constituents of the plant mixture, such as amino acids, organic acids, and sugars, were more cleanly depicted and their inter and intra correlation better reveled by the Pure Shift methods. The simplified data allowed the identification of glutamic acid, a metabolite not observed in previous studies of Cape gooseberry due to heavy overlap of its NMR signals. Overall, the results attained indicated that Ultra-Clean Pure Shift spectra increase the performance of metabolomics data analysis such as STOCSY and multivariate coefficients analysis, and therefore represent a feasible and convenient additional tool available to metabolomics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31053763
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43374-5
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-43374-5
pmc: PMC6499883
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6900Références
Phytochem Anal. 2010 Jan-Feb;21(1):22-32
pubmed: 19904730
Magn Reson Chem. 2007 Apr;45(4):296-316
pubmed: 17351973
Magn Reson Chem. 2015 Jun;53(6):399-426
pubmed: 25899911
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2014 Jul 1;53(27):6990-2
pubmed: 24861024
Anal Chem. 2013 Jun 4;85(11):5297-303
pubmed: 23614579
J Am Chem Soc. 2011 Feb 16;133(6):1662-5
pubmed: 21247157
Magn Reson Chem. 2009 Dec;47 Suppl 1:S2-11
pubmed: 19504464
Chem Commun (Camb). 2016 May 4;52(36):6142-5
pubmed: 27074265
J Proteome Res. 2007 Feb;6(2):469-79
pubmed: 17269704
J Proteome Res. 2018 Aug 3;17(8):2735-2743
pubmed: 29969035
Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 2015 Apr;86-87:1-20
pubmed: 25919196
Anal Chim Acta. 2016 Jun 21;925:1-15
pubmed: 27188312
Chem Commun (Camb). 2015 Oct 28;51(84):15410-3
pubmed: 26343867
Magn Reson Chem. 2018 Oct;56(10):947-953
pubmed: 29044629
Anal Chim Acta. 2012 Oct 31;750:82-97
pubmed: 23062430
Anal Chem. 2005 Mar 1;77(5):1282-9
pubmed: 15732908
J Magn Reson. 2010 Feb;202(2):190-202
pubmed: 20004603
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 05;6:20192
pubmed: 26847260
J Agric Food Chem. 2016 May 11;64(18):3645-52
pubmed: 27086991
Food Chem. 2018 Oct 1;262:94-101
pubmed: 29751927
Chem Commun (Camb). 2017 Sep 12;53(73):10188-10191
pubmed: 28853451
Anal Chem. 2015 Jan 6;87(1):133-46
pubmed: 25375201
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 22;7(1):9108
pubmed: 28831094
J Proteome Res. 2015 Aug 7;14(8):3322-35
pubmed: 26088811
BMC Genomics. 2006 Jun 08;7:142
pubmed: 16762068
Anal Chem. 2005 Jan 15;77(2):517-26
pubmed: 15649048
Food Chem. 2015 May 15;175:500-6
pubmed: 25577112
Anal Chem. 2006 Apr 1;78(7):2262-7
pubmed: 16579606