Can citrate plasma be used in exceptional circumstances for some clinical chemistry and immunochemistry tests?
Aged
Anticoagulants
/ blood
Bias
Calcium Chelating Agents
Chemistry, Clinical
/ methods
Citric Acid
/ blood
Diagnostic Tests, Routine
/ standards
Female
Heparin
/ blood
Humans
Immunochemistry
/ methods
Lipase
/ blood
Lithium
/ blood
Male
Middle Aged
Pre-Analytical Phase
/ standards
Serum Albumin
/ analysis
citrate
clinical chemistry
lithium-heparin
preanalytical variability
Journal
Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany)
ISSN: 2194-802X
Titre abrégé: Diagnosis (Berl)
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101654734
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 11 2019
26 11 2019
Historique:
received:
29
03
2019
accepted:
18
04
2019
pubmed:
6
5
2019
medline:
9
4
2020
entrez:
5
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Background The use of alternative sample matrices may be an advantageous perspective when the laboratory falls short of serum or lithium-heparin plasma for performing clinical chemistry and/or immunochemistry testing. This study was aimed at exploring whether some tests may be performed in citrate plasma as an alternative to lithium-heparin plasma. Methods Paired lithium-heparin and citrate plasma samples collected from 55 inpatients were analyzed on Roche Cobas 8000 for 28 different clinical chemistry and immunochemistry parameters. Data obtained in citrate plasma were adjusted for either the dilution factor or using an equation corresponding to the linear regression calculated by comparing unadjusted lithium-heparin and citrate plasma values. Results Except for magnesium (+17%) and sodium (+11%), unadjusted values of all remaining analytes were significantly lower in citrate than in lithium-heparin plasma, with bias ranging between -6.4% and -25.9%. The correlation between lithium-heparin and citrate plasma values was generally excellent (i.e. >0.90). The adjustment of citrate plasma values for the dilution factor (i.e. 1.1) was only effective in harmonizing the results of albumin and lipase, whilst the concentration of all other analytes remained significantly different between the two sample matrices. The adjustment of plasma citrate values using corrective formulas was instead effective in harmonizing all parameters, with no results remaining statistically different between the two sample matrices. Conclusions Citrate plasma may be used in exceptional circumstances for clinical chemistry and immunochemistry testing as a replacement for lithium-heparin plasma, provided that citrate plasma values are adjusted by using validated corrective equations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31054249
doi: 10.1515/dx-2019-0027
pii: dx-2019-0027
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anticoagulants
0
Calcium Chelating Agents
0
Serum Albumin
0
Citric Acid
2968PHW8QP
Heparin
9005-49-6
Lithium
9FN79X2M3F
Lipase
EC 3.1.1.3
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
369-375Références
Plebani M. Clinical laboratory: bigger is not always better.Diagnosis (Berl) 2018;5:41–6.
Lippi G, Giavarina D, Gelati M, Salvagno GL. Reference range of hemolysis index in serum and lithium-heparin plasma measured with two analytical platforms in a population of unselected outpatients. Clin Chim Acta 2014;429:143–6.
Lippi G, Lampus S, Danese E, Montagnana M, Salvagno GL. Values and stability of serum (or plasma) indices in uncentrifuged serum and lithium-heparin plasma. Diagnosis (Berl) 2019;6:45–7.
Plebani M, Banfi G, Bernardini S, Bondanini F, Conti L, Dorizzi R, et al. Serum or plasma? An old question awaiting for new answers. Biochim Clin, 2019; in press. DOI: 10.19186/BC_2018.069.
Lippi G, Giavarina D. A survey on sample matrix and preanalytical management in clinical laboratories. Biochim Clin 2017;41:142–7.
Lippi G. The irreplaceable value of laboratory diagnostics: four recent tests that have revolutionized clinical practice. EJIFCC 2019;30:7–13.
Cornes M, van Dongen-Lases E, Grankvist K, Ibarz M, Kristensen G, Lippi G, et al. Order of blood draw: opinion paper by the European Federation for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group for the Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE). Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;55:27–31.
Banfi G, Salvagno GL, Lippi G. The role of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) as in vitro anticoagulant for diagnostic purposes. Clin Chem Lab Med 2007;45:565–76.
Lippi G, Favaloro EJ. Preanalytical issues in hemostasis and thrombosis testing. Methods Mol Biol 2017;1646:29–42.
Lippi G, von Meyer A, Cadamuro J, Simundic AM. Blood sample quality. Diagnosis (Berl) 2019;6:25–31.
Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Brocco G, Gelati M, Danese E, Favaloro EJ. Impact of experimental hypercalcemia on routine haemostasis testing. PLoS One 2017;12:e0175094.
Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Adcock DM, Gelati M, Guidi GC,Favaloro EJ. Right or wrong sample received for coagulation testing? Tentative algorithms for detection of an incorrect type of sample. Int J Lab Hematol 2010;32:132–8.
Smith JC Jr, Lewis S, Holbrook J, Seidel K, Rose A. Effect of heparin and citrate on measured concentrations of various analytes in plasma. Clin Chem 1987;33:814–6.
Cerón JJ, Martínez-Subiela S, Hennemann C, Tecles F. The effects of different anticoagulants on routine canine plasma biochemistry. Vet J 2004;167:294–301.
Mohri M, Rezapoor H. Effects of heparin, citrate, and EDTA on plasma biochemistry of sheep: comparison with serum. Res Vet Sci 2009;86:111–4.
van den Besselaar AM, van Zanten AP, Brantjes HM, Elisen MG, van der Meer FJ, Poland DC, et al. Comparative study of blood collection tubes and thromboplastin reagents for correction of INR discrepancies: a proposal for maximum allowable magnesium contamination in sodium citrate anticoagulant solutions. Am J Clin Pathol 2012;138:248–54.
Lima-Oliveira G, Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Picheth G, Guidi GC. Preanalytical management: serum vacuum tubes validation for routine clinical chemistry. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2012;22:180–6.
Plebani M, Graziani MS, Tate JR. Harmonization in laboratory medicine: blowin’ in the wind. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:1559–62.
Lippi G, Plebani M. Opportunities and drawbacks of nonstandard body fluid analysis. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;55:907–9.