Real-World Outcomes and Factors Associated With the Second-Line Treatment of Patients With Gastric, Gastroesophageal Junction, or Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.
Adenocarcinoma
/ drug therapy
Aged
Antineoplastic Agents
/ therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Esophageal Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Esophagogastric Junction
/ pathology
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
Stomach Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Treatment Outcome
chemotherapy
decision-making
gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma
health services research
patient care
survival
Journal
Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
ISSN: 1526-2359
Titre abrégé: Cancer Control
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9438457
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
7
5
2019
pubmed:
7
5
2019
medline:
21
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This retrospective observational study was designed to evaluate overall survival in a real-world patient population and to identify predictive factors associated with receipt of second-line therapy. A retrospective analysis of electronic medical records (Flatiron Health, New York) was conducted among patients initiating first-line therapy from January 1, 2013, through April 30, 2018. Eligible patients were diagnosed with advanced gastric, gastroesophageal junction, or esophageal adenocarcinoma and ≥18 years of age at the time of treatment initiation. Patients alive 45 days after discontinuation of first-line therapy were considered potentially eligible for continued therapy and were categorized into those who received and those who did not receive second-line therapy. Survival analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test without adjusting for any baseline covariates. Factors associated with further treatment were evaluated using logistic regression. A total of 3850 patients met eligibility criteria. Among the 2516 patients available to receive second-line therapy, 1515 (60.2%) received second-line therapy and 1001 (39.8%) did not receive further therapy. Among those potentially eligible to receive second-line therapy, median survival was 15.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.6-16.0) from initiation of first-line therapy for those who received second-line therapy and 10.0 months (95% CI: 9.3-10.7) for those who did not. Longer duration of first-line therapy (≥169 vs ≤84 days), HER2-positive tumors, initially diagnosed with stage IV disease, less weight loss during first-line therapy, and younger age were associated with receipt of second-line therapy (all P < .001). Longer survival was associated with multiple lines of therapy; however, these results should be interpreted with caution, and no causal relationship can be inferred.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31056940
doi: 10.1177/1073274819847642
pmc: PMC6503607
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1073274819847642Références
Eur J Cancer. 2011 Oct;47(15):2306-14
pubmed: 21742485
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Dec 20;29(36):4803-10
pubmed: 22042947
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Dec 20;29(36):4789-95
pubmed: 22042954
Lancet. 2014 Jan 4;383(9911):31-39
pubmed: 24094768
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jan;15(1):78-86
pubmed: 24332238
Br J Cancer. 2014 Feb 18;110(4):967-75
pubmed: 24457912
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Oct;15(11):1224-35
pubmed: 25240821
Gastric Cancer. 2016 Apr;19(2):607-615
pubmed: 25792290
J Gastric Cancer. 2015 Jun;15(2):87-104
pubmed: 26161282
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2018 Mar;49(1):25-34
pubmed: 27975181
Curr Oncol. 2017 Oct;24(5):324-331
pubmed: 29089800
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 28;11:CD004063
pubmed: 29182797
Gastric Cancer. 2018 Sep;21(5):738-744
pubmed: 29392573