Effect of Sunscreen Application Under Maximal Use Conditions on Plasma Concentration of Sunscreen Active Ingredients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Journal
JAMA
ISSN: 1538-3598
Titre abrégé: JAMA
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7501160
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 06 2019
04 06 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
7
5
2019
medline:
23
8
2019
entrez:
7
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has provided guidance that sunscreen active ingredients with systemic absorption greater than 0.5 ng/mL or with safety concerns should undergo nonclinical toxicology assessment including systemic carcinogenicity and additional developmental and reproductive studies. To determine whether the active ingredients (avobenzone, oxybenzone, octocrylene, and ecamsule) of 4 commercially available sunscreens are absorbed into systemic circulation. Randomized clinical trial conducted at a phase 1 clinical pharmacology unit in the United States and enrolling 24 healthy volunteers. Enrollment started in July 2018 and ended in August 2018. Participants were randomized to 1 of 4 sunscreens: spray 1 (n = 6 participants), spray 2 (n = 6), a lotion (n = 6), and a cream (n = 6). Two milligrams of sunscreen per 1 cm2 was applied to 75% of body surface area 4 times per day for 4 days, and 30 blood samples were collected over 7 days from each participant. The primary outcome was the maximum plasma concentration of avobenzone. Secondary outcomes were the maximum plasma concentrations of oxybenzone, octocrylene, and ecamsule. Among 24 participants randomized (mean age, 35.5 [SD, 1.5] years; 12 (50%] women; 14 [58%] black or African American; 14 [58%]), 23 (96%) completed the trial. For avobenzone, geometric mean maximum plasma concentrations were 4.0 ng/mL (coefficient of variation, 6.9%) for spray 1; 3.4 ng/mL (coefficient of variation, 77.3%) for spray 2; 4.3 ng/mL (coefficient of variation, 46.1%) for lotion; and 1.8 ng/mL (coefficient of variation, 32.1%). For oxybenzone, the corresponding values were 209.6 ng/mL (66.8%) for spray 1, 194.9 ng/mL (52.4%) for spray 2, and 169.3 ng/mL (44.5%) for lotion; for octocrylene, 2.9 ng/mL (102%) for spray 1, 7.8 ng/mL (113.3%) for spray 2, 5.7 ng/mL (66.3%) for lotion, and 5.7 ng/mL (47.1%) for cream; and for ecamsule, 1.5 ng/mL (166.1%) for cream. Systemic concentrations greater than 0.5 ng/mL were reached for all 4 products after 4 applications on day 1. The most common adverse event was rash, which developed in 1 participant with each sunscreen. In this preliminary study involving healthy volunteers, application of 4 commercially available sunscreens under maximal use conditions resulted in plasma concentrations that exceeded the threshold established by the FDA for potentially waiving some nonclinical toxicology studies for sunscreens. The systemic absorption of sunscreen ingredients supports the need for further studies to determine the clinical significance of these findings. These results do not indicate that individuals should refrain from the use of sunscreen. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03582215.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31058986
pii: 2733085
doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.5586
pmc: PMC6549296
doi:
Substances chimiques
Acrylates
0
Benzophenones
0
Camphanes
0
Propiophenones
0
Sulfonic Acids
0
Sunscreening Agents
0
terephthalylidene dicamphor sulfonic acid
0
octocrylene
5A68WGF6WM
oxybenzone
95OOS7VE0Y
avobenzone
G63QQF2NOX
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03582215']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase I
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2082-2091Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
Fed Regist. 2011 Jun 17;76(117):35620-65
pubmed: 21682059
Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol. 2003 Nov-Dec;16(6):343-55
pubmed: 14528058
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Jan;105(1):161-167
pubmed: 30094825
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2000 Jul-Aug;1(4):217-24
pubmed: 11702366
Chemosphere. 2010 Nov;81(10):1171-83
pubmed: 21030064
Br J Dermatol. 2006 Feb;154(2):337-40
pubmed: 16433806
Int J Androl. 2012 Jun;35(3):424-36
pubmed: 22612478
Food Chem Toxicol. 2015 Sep;83:237-50
pubmed: 26151237
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2015 Jan;49(1):108-115
pubmed: 26634191
Dermatol Clin. 2006 Jan;24(1):35-51
pubmed: 16311166
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008 Apr;22(4):456-61
pubmed: 18221342