Medical Assistance in Dying: A Review of Canadian Nursing Regulatory Documents.
active voluntary euthanasia
medical assistance in dying
nurse practitioners
nursing
palliative care
physician assisted suicide
terminal care
Journal
Policy, politics & nursing practice
ISSN: 1552-7468
Titre abrégé: Policy Polit Nurs Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100901316
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Aug 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
8
5
2019
medline:
1
5
2020
entrez:
8
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Canada's legalization of Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) in 2016 has had important implications for nursing regulators. Evidence indicates that registered nurses perform key roles in ensuring high-quality care for patients receiving MAiD. Further, Canada is the first country to recognize nurse practitioners as MAiD assessors and providers. The purpose of this article is to analyze the documents created by Canadian nursing regulatory bodies to support registered nurse and nurse practitioner practice in the political context of MAiD. A search of Canadian provincial and territorial websites retrieved 17 documents that provided regulatory guidance for registered nurses and nurse practitioners related to MAiD. Responsibilities of registered nurses varied across all documents reviewed but included assisting in assessment of patient competency, providing information about MAiD to patients and families, coordinating the MAiD process, preparing equipment and intravenous access for medication delivery, coordinating and informing health care personnel related to the MAiD procedure, documenting nursing care provided, supporting patients and significant others, and providing post death care. Responsibilities of nurse practitioners were identified in relation to existing legislation. Safety concerns cited in these documents related to ensuring that nurses understood their boundaries in relation to counseling versus informing, administering versus aiding, ensuring safeguards were met, obtaining informed consent, and documenting. Guidance related to conscientious objection figured prominently across documents. These findings have important implications for system level support for the nursing role in MAiD including ongoing education and support for nurses' moral decision making.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31060478
doi: 10.1177/1527154419845407
pmc: PMC6827351
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
113-130Références
Can Fam Physician. 2017 Mar;63(3):186-190
pubmed: 28292790
Nurs Ethics. 1998 Nov;5(6):497-508
pubmed: 9856067
J Med Ethics. 2006 Apr;32(4):187-92
pubmed: 16574869
J Clin Nurs. 2010 Dec;19(23-24):3372-80
pubmed: 20955480
Qual Health Res. 2018 Sep;28(11):1679-1691
pubmed: 30101678
Nurs Ethics. 2019 May 21;:969733019845127
pubmed: 31113279
Med Health Care Philos. 2010 Feb;13(1):41-8
pubmed: 19381871
Nurs Ethics. 2018 Dec;25(8):955-972
pubmed: 28027675
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2019 Jul/Sep;42(3):216-230
pubmed: 31335329
Nurs Forum. 2018 Oct;53(4):511-520
pubmed: 29972596
Bioethics Forum. 1994 Winter;10(1):10-4
pubmed: 11652283
Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Jul;43(5):589-99
pubmed: 16214146
J Nurs Manag. 1997 Sep;5(5):259-61
pubmed: 9348838
J Med Ethics. 2004 Oct;30(5):494-8
pubmed: 15467086
Res Nurs Health. 2010 Feb;33(1):77-84
pubmed: 20014004
J Palliat Care. 2009 Winter;25(4):264-74
pubmed: 20131583
J Adv Nurs. 2010 Nov;66(11):2410-20
pubmed: 20722798