Retrospective cohort study of hospital variation in airway management during in-hospital cardiac arrest and the association with patient survival: insights from Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Airway Management
/ methods
Cohort Studies
Female
Guidelines as Topic
Heart Arrest
/ mortality
Humans
Intubation, Intratracheal
/ methods
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Odds Ratio
Registries
/ statistics & numerical data
Resuscitation
/ methods
Retrospective Studies
Survival Analysis
Time Factors
Cardiac arrest
Intubation
Resuscitation
Journal
Critical care (London, England)
ISSN: 1466-609X
Titre abrégé: Crit Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9801902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 05 2019
06 05 2019
Historique:
received:
28
12
2018
accepted:
09
04
2019
entrez:
8
5
2019
pubmed:
8
5
2019
medline:
20
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The optimal approach to airway management during in-hospital cardiac arrest is unknown. To describe hospital-level variation in endotracheal intubation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for in-hospital cardiac arrest and the association between hospital use of endotracheal intubation and arrest survival. Retrospective cohort study of adult patients suffering in-hospital cardiac arrest at Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation participating hospitals between January, 2000, and December, 2016. Hospitals were categorized into quartiles based on the proportion of in-hospital cardiac arrest patients managed with endotracheal intubation during CPR. Risk-adjusted mixed models with random intercepts were created to assess the association between hospital quartile of in-hospital arrests managed with endotracheal intubation during CPR and survival to hospital discharge. Hospital rate of endotracheal intubation during CPR for in-hospital arrest MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Survival to hospital discharge RESULTS: Among 155,252 patients suffering in-hospital cardiac arrest at 656 hospitals, 69.7% of patients received endotracheal intubation during CPR and overall survival to discharge was 24.8%. At the hospital level, the median rate of endotracheal intubation use was 71.2% (interquartile range, 63.6 to 78.1%; range, 26.6 to 100%). We found a strong inverse association between hospital rate of endotracheal intubation and survival to discharge (risk-adjusted odds ratio comparing highest intubation quartile vs. lowest intubation quartile, 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.74 to 0.90; p value < .001). This association was modified by the presence of respiratory failure prior to arrest (p for interaction < .001), and stratified analyses demonstrated lower patient survival at hospitals with higher rates of endotracheal intubation was limited to patients without respiratory failure prior to cardiac arrest. In a national sample of patients suffering IHCA, the use of endotracheal intubation during CPR varied across hospitals. We found a strong inverse association between hospital use of endotracheal intubation during CPR and survival to discharge, but this association was confined to patients without respiratory failure prior to arrest. Identifying the optimal approach to airway management for in-hospital cardiac arrest may have a significant impact on patient survival.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31060580
doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2426-5
pii: 10.1186/s13054-019-2426-5
pmc: PMC6501386
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
158Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : K08 HL122527
Pays : United States
Références
JAMA. 2010 Jun 2;303(21):2165-71
pubmed: 20516417
Lancet. 2012 Oct 27;380(9852):1473-81
pubmed: 22958912
Circulation. 2004 Apr 27;109(16):1960-5
pubmed: 15066941
Circulation. 2015 Nov 3;132(18 Suppl 2):S414-35
pubmed: 26472993
JAMA. 2017 Feb 7;317(5):494-506
pubmed: 28118660
Circulation. 2015 Nov 3;132(18 Suppl 2):S444-64
pubmed: 26472995
JAMA. 2008 Mar 12;299(10):1158-65
pubmed: 18334691
Resuscitation. 2015 Jun;91:108-15
pubmed: 25676321
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Mar;17(3):269-75
pubmed: 20370759
Resuscitation. 2018 Apr;125:79-82
pubmed: 29425975
JAMA. 2017 Feb 7;317(5):477-478
pubmed: 28118658
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 3;358(1):9-17
pubmed: 18172170
BMJ. 2014 May 20;348:g3028
pubmed: 24846323
J Emerg Med. 2013 Sep;45(3):458-66
pubmed: 23602145
Crit Care Med. 2011 Nov;39(11):2401-6
pubmed: 21705896
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Sep;52(3):244-52
pubmed: 18374452
Resuscitation. 2015 Aug;93:124-7
pubmed: 26073275
Resuscitation. 2018 Feb;123:58-64
pubmed: 29102470
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Nov;54(5):645-652.e1
pubmed: 19573949
Circulation. 2000 Apr 11;101(14):1743-8
pubmed: 10758059
Anesthesiology. 2011 Jan;114(1):42-8
pubmed: 21150574
N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 15;367(20):1912-20
pubmed: 23150959
Resuscitation. 2016 Apr;101:57-64
pubmed: 26851059
Am J Med. 2006 Apr;119(4):335-40
pubmed: 16564776