Twenty-four hour pharmacokinetic relationships for intravenous vancomycin and novel urinary biomarkers of acute kidney injury in a rat model.
Acute Kidney Injury
/ chemically induced
Administration, Intravenous
Animals
Anti-Bacterial Agents
/ administration & dosage
Biomarkers
/ urine
Cell Adhesion Molecules
/ urine
Chromatography, Liquid
Clusterin
/ urine
Male
Osteopontin
/ urine
Plasma
/ chemistry
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Vancomycin
/ administration & dosage
Journal
The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy
ISSN: 1460-2091
Titre abrégé: J Antimicrob Chemother
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7513617
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 08 2019
01 08 2019
Historique:
received:
01
10
2018
revised:
11
03
2019
accepted:
23
03
2019
pubmed:
9
5
2019
medline:
13
8
2020
entrez:
9
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To identify the pharmacokinetic (PK) and toxicodynamic (TD) relationship for vancomycin-induced kidney injury. Male Sprague-Dawley rats received intravenous (iv) vancomycin. Doses ranging from 150 mg/kg/day to 400 mg/kg/day were administered as a single or twice-daily injection over 24 h (total protocol duration). Controls received iv saline. Plasma was sampled with up to eight samples in 24 h per rat. Twenty-four hour urine was collected and assayed for kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM-1), osteopontin and clusterin. Vancomycin in plasma was quantified via LC-MS/MS. PK analyses were conducted using Pmetrics for R. PK exposures during the first 24 h (i.e. AUC0-24h, Cmax 0-24h and Cmin 0-24h) were calculated. PK/TD relationships were assessed with Spearman's rank coefficient (rs) and the best-fit mathematical model. PK/TD data were generated from 45 vancomycin-treated and 5 control rats. A two-compartment model fit the data well (Bayesian: observed versus predicted R2 = 0.97). Exposure-response relationships were found between AUC0-24h versus KIM-1 and osteopontin (R2 = 0.61 and 0.66) and Cmax 0-24h versus KIM-1 and osteopontin (R2 = 0.50 and 0.56) using a four-parameter Hill fit. Conversely, Cmin 0-24h was less predictive of KIM-1 and osteopontin (R2 = 0.46 and 0.53). A vancomycin AUC0-24h of 482.2 corresponded to a 90% of maximal rise in KIM-1. Vancomycin-induced kidney injury as defined by urinary biomarkers is driven by vancomycin AUC or Cmax rather than Cmin. Further, an identified PK/TD target AUC0-24h of 482.2 mg·h/L may have direct relevance to human outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31065686
pii: 5486503
doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz167
pmc: PMC6640290
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Biomarkers
0
Cell Adhesion Molecules
0
Clu protein, rat
0
Clusterin
0
Havcr1protein, rat
0
Spp1 protein, rat
0
Osteopontin
106441-73-0
Vancomycin
6Q205EH1VU
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2326-2334Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R15 AI105742
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Kidney Int. 2002 Jul;62(1):237-44
pubmed: 12081583
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2003 Jun 15;189(3):180-95
pubmed: 12791303
Toxicol In Vitro. 2004 Dec;18(6):797-803
pubmed: 15465645
Crit Care Med. 2007 Aug;35(8):1837-43; quiz 1852
pubmed: 17581483
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007 Oct;18(10):2704-14
pubmed: 17898236
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008 Apr;52(4):1330-6
pubmed: 18227177
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Nov 10;168(20):2254-60
pubmed: 19001203
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009 Jan 1;66(1):82-98
pubmed: 19106348
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2009 Aug 1;238(3):306-14
pubmed: 19371613
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2009 Aug 1;238(3):301-5
pubmed: 19371616
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Aug 1;49(3):325-7
pubmed: 19569969
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Aug 15;49(4):507-14
pubmed: 19586413
Nat Biotechnol. 2010 May;28(5):436-40
pubmed: 20458311
Nat Biotechnol. 2010 May;28(5):455-62
pubmed: 20458315
Nat Biotechnol. 2010 May;28(5):478-85
pubmed: 20458318
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011 Feb;37(2):95-101
pubmed: 21130609
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Jul;55(7):3278-83
pubmed: 21576448
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Dec;55(12):5475-9
pubmed: 21947388
Neth J Med. 2011 Sep;69(9):379-83
pubmed: 21978980
Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Dec;53(11):1100-10
pubmed: 21998281
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Mar 1;54(5):621-9
pubmed: 22247123
Clin Ther. 2012 Jan;34(1):149-57
pubmed: 22284995
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Sep;68(9):1243-55
pubmed: 22411630
Toxicol Pathol. 2012 Oct;40(7):1031-48
pubmed: 22581810
Ther Drug Monit. 2012 Aug;34(4):467-76
pubmed: 22722776
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2013 Apr;40(2):189-99
pubmed: 23404393
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 May;57(5):2435
pubmed: 23580581
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2014 Mar;43(3):297-8
pubmed: 24388114
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 14;9(10):e109407
pubmed: 25313566
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;37(1):70-9
pubmed: 26456803
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 15;10(12):e0145042
pubmed: 26669323
J Pharm Pharmacol. 2016 Jun;68(6):803-9
pubmed: 27109141
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Sep 23;60(10):5742-51
pubmed: 27431226
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Nov 1;176(11):1639-1648
pubmed: 27653796
Curr Drug Saf. 2017;12(1):62-66
pubmed: 27784223
Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Nov;10(6):496-502
pubmed: 28675684
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Oct 24;61(11):
pubmed: 28807910
Clin Lab Med. 1993 Mar;13(1):33-52
pubmed: 8462268