High prevalence of multi drug resistant tuberculosis in people living with HIV in Western India.
AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections
/ drug therapy
Adolescent
Adult
Antitubercular Agents
/ therapeutic use
Child
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
HIV Infections
/ epidemiology
Humans
India
/ epidemiology
Isoniazid
/ therapeutic use
Male
Middle Aged
Prevalence
Rifampin
/ therapeutic use
Risk Factors
Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant
/ drug therapy
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
/ drug therapy
HIV
India
MDRTB
Prevalence
Journal
BMC infectious diseases
ISSN: 1471-2334
Titre abrégé: BMC Infect Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968551
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 May 2019
08 May 2019
Historique:
received:
18
07
2018
accepted:
29
04
2019
entrez:
10
5
2019
pubmed:
10
5
2019
medline:
30
7
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Most studies assessing drug resistant tuberculosis (DRTB) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infected patients in India have used conventional culture- based systems to diagnose DRTB that have a longer turnaround time leading to risk of amplification of resistance to an empirical regimen. We determined the prevalence of DRTB amongst people living with HIV (PLHIV) using the line probe assay and determined risk factors associated with the presence of multi drug resistant tuberculosis (MDRTB). A Cross-sectional study was undertaken at Poona Hospital and Research Center (PHRC) and the Institute of Infectious Diseases, two tertiary level private care centers in Pune, India. Consenting PLHIV with confirmed Pulmonary TB (PTB) and/or extra-pulmonary TB (EPTB) diagnosed based on detection of Mycobacterium TB by line probe assay (Geno Type MTBDRplus version 2) on clinical specimens were included. Those with documented past history of DRTB were excluded. Resistance against anti-TB drugs was determined by the same assay. The prevalence of any form of drug resistant TB (DRTB), MDRTB, Rifampicin resistant TB (RRTB) and Isoniazid (INH) mono-resistant TB were determined as the proportion of these amongst all included PLHIV-TB. A multivariate analysis was conducted to determine risk factors that were statistically associated with MDRTB, DRTB, RRTB and INH mono-resistant TB. Two hundred PLHIV were recruited. The prevalence (95% CI) of MDRTB, INH mono- resistance and RR resistance was 12.5% (7.9-17.1%), 9% (6.9-11.2%) and 2.5% (1.4-3.6%), respectively. The prevalence (95% CI) of MDRTB among new and relapsed patients was 8.8% (6.5-11.1%) and 23.1% (17.2-28.9%), respectively. Tuberculosis relapse was the only factor significantly associated with MDRTB, DRTB and INH mono-resistant TB. We document a high prevalence of drug resistance to anti-TB drugs including MDRTB among PLHIV in our setting using Geno Type MTBDRplus directly on clinical specimens. This validates the WHO recommendation of performing routine rapid molecular resistance testing prior to initiating anti-TB treatment among all PLHIV with presumptive TB. Using rapid molecular testing especially Geno Type MTBDRplus (that detects resistance to INH and Rifampicin simultaneously) reduces the turn-around time helping in optimizing treatment.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Most studies assessing drug resistant tuberculosis (DRTB) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infected patients in India have used conventional culture- based systems to diagnose DRTB that have a longer turnaround time leading to risk of amplification of resistance to an empirical regimen. We determined the prevalence of DRTB amongst people living with HIV (PLHIV) using the line probe assay and determined risk factors associated with the presence of multi drug resistant tuberculosis (MDRTB).
METHODS
METHODS
A Cross-sectional study was undertaken at Poona Hospital and Research Center (PHRC) and the Institute of Infectious Diseases, two tertiary level private care centers in Pune, India. Consenting PLHIV with confirmed Pulmonary TB (PTB) and/or extra-pulmonary TB (EPTB) diagnosed based on detection of Mycobacterium TB by line probe assay (Geno Type MTBDRplus version 2) on clinical specimens were included. Those with documented past history of DRTB were excluded. Resistance against anti-TB drugs was determined by the same assay. The prevalence of any form of drug resistant TB (DRTB), MDRTB, Rifampicin resistant TB (RRTB) and Isoniazid (INH) mono-resistant TB were determined as the proportion of these amongst all included PLHIV-TB. A multivariate analysis was conducted to determine risk factors that were statistically associated with MDRTB, DRTB, RRTB and INH mono-resistant TB.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Two hundred PLHIV were recruited. The prevalence (95% CI) of MDRTB, INH mono- resistance and RR resistance was 12.5% (7.9-17.1%), 9% (6.9-11.2%) and 2.5% (1.4-3.6%), respectively. The prevalence (95% CI) of MDRTB among new and relapsed patients was 8.8% (6.5-11.1%) and 23.1% (17.2-28.9%), respectively. Tuberculosis relapse was the only factor significantly associated with MDRTB, DRTB and INH mono-resistant TB.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
We document a high prevalence of drug resistance to anti-TB drugs including MDRTB among PLHIV in our setting using Geno Type MTBDRplus directly on clinical specimens. This validates the WHO recommendation of performing routine rapid molecular resistance testing prior to initiating anti-TB treatment among all PLHIV with presumptive TB. Using rapid molecular testing especially Geno Type MTBDRplus (that detects resistance to INH and Rifampicin simultaneously) reduces the turn-around time helping in optimizing treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31068153
doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4042-z
pii: 10.1186/s12879-019-4042-z
pmc: PMC6507020
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antitubercular Agents
0
Isoniazid
V83O1VOZ8L
Rifampin
VJT6J7R4TR
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
391Références
Kidney Int. 2008 Aug;74(4):415-7
pubmed: 18670407
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2012 Mar;43(2):354-63
pubmed: 23082587
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Dec 1;59(11):1559-66
pubmed: 25091301
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Dec 15;59(12):1798-804
pubmed: 25156114
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 21;9(10):e110461
pubmed: 25333696
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 06;10(2):e0116721
pubmed: 25658091
Lung India. 2016 Jan-Feb;33(1):27-31
pubmed: 26933303
Indian J Tuberc. 2015 Oct;62(4):207-10
pubmed: 26970460
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2016 May;20(5):631-7
pubmed: 27084817
Elife. 2016 Aug 09;5:
pubmed: 27502557
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2016 Sep;110(9):534-541
pubmed: 27738284
Trop Doct. 2017 Apr;47(2):118-123
pubmed: 27784827
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Feb;17(2):223-234
pubmed: 27865891
Indian J Tuberc. 2016 Oct;63(4):251-254
pubmed: 27998498
Int J Mycobacteriol. 2016 Dec;5 Suppl 1:S127-S128
pubmed: 28043503
Int J Mycobacteriol. 2016 Dec;5 Suppl 1:S161
pubmed: 28043527
Int J Mycobacteriol. 2016 Dec;5 Suppl 1:S193-S194
pubmed: 28043548
Int J Mycobacteriol. 2016 Dec;5 Suppl 1:S59
pubmed: 28043614
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Feb 23;17(1):170
pubmed: 28231851
Microbiol Spectr. 2017 Jan;5(1):
pubmed: 28233512
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2017 Feb 1;21(2):129-139
pubmed: 28234075