Performance of FRAX in Women with Breast Cancer Initiating Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy: A Registry-Based Cohort Study.


Journal

Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research
ISSN: 1523-4681
Titre abrégé: J Bone Miner Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8610640

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2019
Historique:
received: 01 12 2018
revised: 18 02 2019
accepted: 10 03 2019
pubmed: 10 5 2019
medline: 14 8 2020
entrez: 10 5 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

FRAX was developed to predict 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture in the general population. Aromatase inhibitors (AI) used in breast cancer induce loss in bone mineral density (BMD) and are reported to increase fracture risk. AI exposure is not a direct input to FRAX but is captured under "secondary osteoporosis". To inform use of FRAX in women treated with AI, we used a population-based registry for the Province of Manitoba, Canada, to identify women aged ≥40 years initiating AI for breast cancer with at least 12 months' AI exposure (n = 1775), women with breast cancer not receiving AI (n = 1016), and women from the general population (n = 34,205). Among AI users, fracture probability estimated without BMD (AI use coded as secondary osteoporosis) significantly overestimated risk (10-year observed/predicted ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-0.68; 10-year hip fracture observed/predicted ratio 0.33, 95% CI 0.18-0.49). However, when BMD was included in the fracture probability, there was no significant difference between observed and predicted fracture risk. In Cox proportional hazards models, FRAX stratified risk of MOF, hip, and any fracture equally well in all subgroups (p-interaction >0.1). When adjusted for FRAX score without BMD, with AI use coded as secondary osteoporosis, AI users were at significantly lower risk for MOF (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.78, 95% CI 0.64-0.95), hip fracture (HR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.29-0.73) and any fracture (HR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.63-0.89). AI use was no longer significantly associated with fractures when AI use was not entered as secondary osteoporosis in FRAX without BMD or when BMD was included in the FRAX calculation. In conclusion, FRAX scores stratify fracture risk equally well in women receiving AI therapy as in non-users, but including secondary osteoporosis as a risk factor for AI users overestimates fracture risk. Our results call this practice into question. © 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31069862
doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3726
doi:

Substances chimiques

Aromatase Inhibitors 0

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Journal Article Multicenter Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1428-1435

Subventions

Organisme : Versus Arthritis
ID : 17702
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_U147585819
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_U147585824
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_U147585827
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Auteurs

William D Leslie (WD)

University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

Suzanne N Morin (SN)

McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Lisa M Lix (LM)

University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

Saroj Niraula (S)

University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

Eugene V McCloskey (EV)

Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK.

Helena Johansson (H)

Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK.
Mary McKillop Health Institute, Catholic University of Australia, Melbourne, Australia.

Nicholas C Harvey (NC)

MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.

John A Kanis (JA)

Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK.
Mary McKillop Health Institute, Catholic University of Australia, Melbourne, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH