Evaluation of Fluid Resuscitation Control Algorithms via a Hardware-in-the-Loop Test Bed.
Journal
IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering
ISSN: 1558-2531
Titre abrégé: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0012737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2020
02 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
10
5
2019
medline:
29
12
2020
entrez:
10
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This paper presents a hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) testing platform for evaluating the performance of fluid resuscitation control algorithms. The proposed platform is a cyber-physical system that integrates physical devices with computational models and computer-based algorithms. The HIL test bed is evaluated against in silico and in vivo data to ensure the hemodynamic variables are appropriately predicted in the proposed platform. The test bed is then used to investigate the performance of two fluid resuscitation control algorithms: a decision table (rule-based) and a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller. The statistical evaluation of test bed indicates that similar results are observed in the HIL test bed, in silico implementation, and the in vivo data, verifying that the HIL test bed can adequately predict the hemodynamic responses. Comparison of the two fluid resuscitation controllers reveals that both controllers stabilized hemodynamic variables over time and had similar speed to efficiently achieve the target level of the hemodynamic endpoint. However, the accuracy of the PID controller was higher than the rule-based for the scenarios tested in the HIL platform. The results demonstrate the potential of the HIL test bed for realistic testing of physiologic controllers by incorporating physical devices with computational models of physiology and disturbances. This type of testing enables relatively fast evaluation of physiologic closed-loop control systems to aid in iterative design processes and offers complementary means to existing techniques (e.g., in silico, in vivo, and clinical studies) for testing of such systems against a wide range of disturbances and scenarios.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31071014
doi: 10.1109/TBME.2019.2915526
pmc: PMC7082848
mid: NIHMS1551411
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
471-481Subventions
Organisme : Intramural FDA HHS
ID : FD999999
Pays : United States
Références
Biomed Eng Online. 2009 Jul 08;8:13
pubmed: 19586547
Physiol Rep. 2016 Apr;4(7):
pubmed: 27044850
Crit Care Med. 2006 Apr;34(4):1185-92
pubmed: 16484921
Front Physiol. 2019 Mar 26;10:220
pubmed: 30971934
Anesth Analg. 2018 Jun;126(6):1916-1925
pubmed: 28763355
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2018 Nov 19;:
pubmed: 30452347
Anesth Analg. 2012 Jan;114(1):130-43
pubmed: 21965362
J Trauma. 2008 Apr;64(4 Suppl):S333-41
pubmed: 18385585
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Sep;35(9):650-658
pubmed: 29750699
Control Eng Pract. 2018 Apr;73(April 2018):149-160
pubmed: 29887676
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2018 Sep;28(5):436-446
pubmed: 30117659
Disaster Mil Med. 2017 Jan 9;3:1
pubmed: 28265453
J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1992 Feb;20(1):63-94
pubmed: 1588504
Crit Care. 2011;15(6):R278
pubmed: 22112587
Shock. 2004 Sep;22(3):262-9
pubmed: 15316397