Salvage Radical Prostatectomy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Morbidity and Functional Outcomes from a Large Multicenter Series of Open versus Robotic Approaches.
Aged
Blood Loss, Surgical
/ statistics & numerical data
Constriction, Pathologic
/ epidemiology
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Incidence
Length of Stay
/ statistics & numerical data
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ blood
Postoperative Complications
/ epidemiology
Prostate
/ pathology
Prostate-Specific Antigen
/ blood
Prostatectomy
/ adverse effects
Prostatic Neoplasms
/ blood
Retrospective Studies
Robotic Surgical Procedures
/ adverse effects
Salvage Therapy
/ adverse effects
Treatment Outcome
Urinary Incontinence
/ epidemiology
local
neoplasm recurrence
prostatectomy
prostatic neoplasms
robotic surgical procedures
treatment outcome
Journal
The Journal of urology
ISSN: 1527-3792
Titre abrégé: J Urol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376374
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2019
10 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
11
5
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
11
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Salvage radical prostatectomy has historically yielded a poor functional outcome and a high complication rate. However, recent reports of robotic salvage radical prostatectomy have demonstrated improved results. In this study we assessed salvage radical prostatectomy functional outcomes and complications when comparing robotic and open approaches. We retrospectively collected data on salvage radical prostatectomy for recurrent prostate cancer after local nonsurgical treatment at 18 tertiary referral centers from 2000 to 2016. The Clavien-Dindo classification was applied to classify complications. Complications and functional outcomes were evaluated by univariable and multivariable analysis. We included 395 salvage radical prostatectomies, of which 186 were open and 209 were robotic. Robotic salvage radical prostatectomy yielded lower blood loss and a shorter hospital stay (each p <0.0001). No significant difference emerged in the incidence of major and overall complications (10.1%, p=0.16, and 34.9%, p=0.67), including an overall low risk of rectal injury and fistula (1.58% and 2.02%, respectively). However, anastomotic stricture was more frequent for open salvage radical prostatectomy (16.57% vs 7.66%, p <0.01). Overall 24.6% of patients had had severe incontinence, defined as 3 or more pads per day, for 12 or 6 months. On multivariable analysis robotic salvage radical prostatectomy was an independent predictor of continence preservation (OR 0.411, 95% CI 0.232-0.727, p=0.022). Limitations include the retrospective nature of the study and the absence of a standardized surgical technique. In this contemporary series to our knowledge salvage radical prostatectomy showed a low risk of major complications and better functional outcomes than previously reported. Robotic salvage radical prostatectomy may reduce anastomotic stricture, blood loss and hospital stay, and improve continence outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31075058
doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000327
doi:
Substances chimiques
Prostate-Specific Antigen
EC 3.4.21.77
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
725-731Investigateurs
Georgio Calleris
(G)
Stefania Munegato
(S)
Anna Palazzetti
(A)
Francesca Pisano
(F)
Umberto Ricardi
(U)
Antonio Battaglia
(A)
Roland van Velthoven
(R)
Paul Cathcart
(P)
Salvatore Smelzo
(S)
Joseph Smith
(J)
Andre Abreu
(A)
Inderbir S. Gill
(IS)