Universal Tumor DNA BRCA1/2 Testing of Ovarian Cancer: Prescreening PARPi Treatment and Genetic Predisposition.
Journal
Journal of the National Cancer Institute
ISSN: 1460-2105
Titre abrégé: J Natl Cancer Inst
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7503089
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 02 2020
01 02 2020
Historique:
received:
23
01
2019
revised:
20
03
2019
accepted:
29
04
2019
pubmed:
12
5
2019
medline:
11
8
2020
entrez:
12
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Women with epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) have a higher chance to benefit from poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) therapy if their tumor has a somatic or hereditary BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant. Current guidelines advise BRCA1/2 genetic predisposition testing for all OC patients, though this does not detect somatic variants. We assessed the feasibility of a workflow for universal tumor DNA BRCA1/2 testing of all newly diagnosed OC patients as a prescreen for PARPi treatment and cancer predisposition testing. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue was obtained from OC patients in seven hospitals immediately after diagnosis or primary surgery. DNA was extracted, and universal tumor BRCA1/2 testing was then performed in a single site. Diagnostic yield, uptake, referral rates for genetic predisposition testing, and experiences of patients and gynecologists were evaluated. Tumor BRCA1/2 testing was performed for 315 (77.6%) of the 406 eligible OC samples, of which 305 (96.8%) were successful. In 51 of these patients, pathogenic variants were detected (16.7%). Most patients (88.2%) went on to have a genetic predisposition test. BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants were shown to be hereditary in 56.8% and somatic in 43.2% of patients. Participating gynecologists and patients were overwhelmingly positive about the workflow. Universal tumor BRCA1/2 testing in all newly diagnosed OC patients is feasible, effective, and appreciated by patients and gynecologists. Because many variants cannot be detected in DNA from blood, testing tumor DNA as the first step can double the identification rate of patients who stand to benefit most from PARP inhibitors.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Women with epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) have a higher chance to benefit from poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) therapy if their tumor has a somatic or hereditary BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant. Current guidelines advise BRCA1/2 genetic predisposition testing for all OC patients, though this does not detect somatic variants. We assessed the feasibility of a workflow for universal tumor DNA BRCA1/2 testing of all newly diagnosed OC patients as a prescreen for PARPi treatment and cancer predisposition testing.
METHODS
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue was obtained from OC patients in seven hospitals immediately after diagnosis or primary surgery. DNA was extracted, and universal tumor BRCA1/2 testing was then performed in a single site. Diagnostic yield, uptake, referral rates for genetic predisposition testing, and experiences of patients and gynecologists were evaluated.
RESULTS
Tumor BRCA1/2 testing was performed for 315 (77.6%) of the 406 eligible OC samples, of which 305 (96.8%) were successful. In 51 of these patients, pathogenic variants were detected (16.7%). Most patients (88.2%) went on to have a genetic predisposition test. BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants were shown to be hereditary in 56.8% and somatic in 43.2% of patients. Participating gynecologists and patients were overwhelmingly positive about the workflow.
CONCLUSIONS
Universal tumor BRCA1/2 testing in all newly diagnosed OC patients is feasible, effective, and appreciated by patients and gynecologists. Because many variants cannot be detected in DNA from blood, testing tumor DNA as the first step can double the identification rate of patients who stand to benefit most from PARP inhibitors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31076742
pii: 5488012
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz080
pmc: PMC7019087
doi:
Substances chimiques
BRCA1 Protein
0
BRCA1 protein, human
0
BRCA2 Protein
0
Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
161-169Investigateurs
Inge M W Ebisch
(IMW)
Ineke M de Kievit
(IM)
Nicole G Laurens
(NG)
Nelleke Ottevanger
(N)
Robbert J van Alphen
(RJ)
M Caroline Vos
(MC)
Anneke A M van den Wurff
(AAM)
Roel van Kampen
(R)
Helen J M M Mertens
(HJMM)
Prapto Sastrowijoto
(P)
Mirjam J A Engelen
(MJA)
Roy I Lalisang
(RI)
Brigitte F M Slangen
(BFM)
Loes F S Kooreman
(LFS)
Geert-Jan M Creemers
(GM)
Jurgen M J Piek
(JMJ)
Paul Klinkhamer
(P)
Judith W M Jeuken
(JWM)
Anette L Aalders
(AL)
Riena P Aliredjo
(RP)
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press.
Références
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;35(34):3800-3806
pubmed: 28820644
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Jun;149(3):565-569
pubmed: 29653687
Lancet. 2017 Oct 28;390(10106):1949-1961
pubmed: 28916367
Br J Cancer. 2016 Nov 22;115(11):1313-1320
pubmed: 27824811
J Community Genet. 2017 Oct;8(4):303-310
pubmed: 28868568
Hum Mutat. 2017 Feb;38(2):226-235
pubmed: 27767231
Cancers (Basel). 2018 Nov 13;10(11):
pubmed: 30428547
J Mol Diagn. 2018 Sep;20(5):600-611
pubmed: 29936257
N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 27;379(26):2495-2505
pubmed: 30345884
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Apr;145(1):130-136
pubmed: 28162234
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Oct;143(1):113-119
pubmed: 27430397
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Jul;61:137-45
pubmed: 27209246
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Sep;18(9):1274-1284
pubmed: 28754483
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Nov;17(11):1579-1589
pubmed: 27617661
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Apr;149(1):121-126
pubmed: 29402500
Nature. 2011 Jun 29;474(7353):609-15
pubmed: 21720365
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Aug 1;28(22):3570-6
pubmed: 20606085
Cell Oncol. 2007;29(1):19-24
pubmed: 17429138
Nature. 2005 Apr 14;434(7035):917-21
pubmed: 15829967
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec;375(22):2154-2164
pubmed: 27717299
J Med Genet. 2018 Sep;55(9):571-577
pubmed: 30042185
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Feb 1;20(3):764-75
pubmed: 24240112
JAMA. 2010 Sep 1;304(9):967-75
pubmed: 20810374
Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2016 Apr 14;14:8
pubmed: 27087880