Comparison of pharmacokinetics and the exposure-response relationship of dapagliflozin between adolescent/young adult and adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.


Journal

British journal of clinical pharmacology
ISSN: 1365-2125
Titre abrégé: Br J Clin Pharmacol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7503323

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2019
Historique:
received: 04 12 2018
revised: 15 04 2019
accepted: 20 04 2019
pubmed: 12 5 2019
medline: 25 8 2020
entrez: 12 5 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To quantitatively compare pharmacokinetics (PK) and the exposure-response (ER) relationship of the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor, dapagliflozin, between adolescents/young adults and adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Data from 2 clinical studies for dapagliflozin were analysed using a non-linear mixed-effects approach. The PK and the relationship between dapagliflozin exposure and response (24-hour urinary glucose excretion) were characterized. PK was evaluated using a 2-compartment model with first-order absorption while the exposure response-relationship was analysed using a sigmoidal maximal-effect model. The 24-hour median blood glucose, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), sex, age and body weight were evaluated as covariates. A 2-compartment model with first order absorption provided a reasonable fit to the dapagliflozin PK data. Body weight was found to be a significant covariate on dapagliflozin exposure. The ER relationship was best described by a sigmoidal maximal effect model with 24-hour median blood glucose and eGFR as significant covariates on maximal effect. In accordance with the observed data, model-predicted urinary glucose excretion response following 10 mg dapagliflozin dose was higher in the study in adolescents/young adults (138.0 g/24 h) compared to adults (70.5 g/24 h) with T1DM. This is linked to higher eGFR and 24-hour median blood glucose in this trial. Dapagliflozin PK and ER relationship were similar in the 2 analysed studies after accounting for covariate effects. These results suggest that no dose adjustment is required for adolescent patients with T1DM.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31077437
doi: 10.1111/bcp.13981
pmc: PMC6624399
doi:

Substances chimiques

Benzhydryl Compounds 0
Blood Glucose 0
Glucosides 0
Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors 0
dapagliflozin 1ULL0QJ8UC

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1820-1828

Informations de copyright

© 2019 The British Pharmacological Society.

Références

Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 Nov;4(11):1832-43
pubmed: 19820136
Diabetes Care. 2018 Sep;41(9):1938-1946
pubmed: 30026335
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016 Mar;18(3):236-40
pubmed: 26510924
Diabetes. 2008 Jun;57(6):1723-9
pubmed: 18356408
Diabetes Care. 2015 Jun;38(6):971-8
pubmed: 25998289
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Nov;5(11):864-876
pubmed: 28919061
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Apr;21(4):829-836
pubmed: 30456904
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2007 Oct;34(5):711-26
pubmed: 17653836
Br J Pharmacol. 2017 Dec;174 Suppl 1:S360-S446
pubmed: 29055035
Diabetes Care. 2015 Mar;38(3):412-9
pubmed: 25271207
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Nov;19(11):1635-1639
pubmed: 28417527
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Aug;85(8):1820-1828
pubmed: 31077437
J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Oct;62(10):1227-1235
pubmed: 35403243
J Med Chem. 2008 Mar 13;51(5):1145-9
pubmed: 18260618
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jan 4;46(D1):D1091-D1106
pubmed: 29149325
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2014 Jan;53(1):17-27
pubmed: 24105299
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1999 Jan;58(1):51-64
pubmed: 10195646
Br J Pharmacol. 2017 Dec;174 Suppl 1:S1-S16
pubmed: 29055037
N Engl J Med. 2017 Apr 13;376(15):1419-1429
pubmed: 28402773
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016 Jul;18(7):685-92
pubmed: 27299483
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Aug 15;145(4):247-54
pubmed: 16908915
Diabetes Care. 2016 Aug;39(8):1378-83
pubmed: 27411699
Exp Ther Med. 2016 Apr;11(4):1168-1172
pubmed: 27073417
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2004 Aug;75(2):85-94
pubmed: 15212851
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Apr;17(4):423-5
pubmed: 25511685

Auteurs

David Busse (D)

Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology, Early Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Weifeng Tang (W)

Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology, Early Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.

Markus Scheerer (M)

Diabetes Medical Department, AstraZeneca GmbH, Wedel, Germany.

Thomas Danne (T)

AUF DER BULT, Children's and Youth Hospital, Hannover, Germany.

Torben Biester (T)

AUF DER BULT, Children's and Youth Hospital, Hannover, Germany.

Viktor Sokolov (V)

M&S Decisions, Moscow, Russia.

David Boulton (D)

Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology, Early Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.

Joanna Parkinson (J)

Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology, Early Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH