Identifying the Transcriptome Signatures of Calcium Channel Blockers in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes.
Amlodipine
/ pharmacology
Calcium Channel Blockers
/ pharmacology
Cell Differentiation
Cells, Cultured
Diltiazem
/ pharmacology
Humans
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
/ cytology
Myocytes, Cardiac
/ cytology
Myosin Heavy Chains
/ genetics
Nifedipine
/ pharmacology
Transcriptome
Verapamil
/ pharmacology
calcium channel blockers
computational biology
induced pluripotent stem cells
muscle cells
myocytes, cardiac
Journal
Circulation research
ISSN: 1524-4571
Titre abrégé: Circ Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0047103
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 07 2019
05 07 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
14
5
2019
medline:
21
4
2020
entrez:
14
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are an important class of drugs in managing cardiovascular diseases. Patients usually rely on these medications for the remainder of their lives after diagnosis. Although the acute pharmacological actions of CCBs in the hearts are well-defined, little is known about the drug-specific effects on human cardiomyocyte transcriptomes and physiological alterations after long-term exposure. This study aimed to simulate chronic CCB treatment and to examine both the functional and transcriptomic changes in human cardiomyocytes. We differentiated cardiomyocytes and generated engineered heart tissues from 3 human induced pluripotent stem cell lines and exposed them to 4 different CCBs-nifedipine, amlodipine, diltiazem, and verapamil-at their physiological serum concentrations for 2 weeks. Without inducing cell death and damage to myofilament structure, CCBs elicited line-specific inhibition on calcium kinetics and contractility. While all 4 CCBs exerted similar inhibition on calcium kinetics, verapamil applied the strongest inhibition on cardiomyocyte contractile function. By profiling cardiomyocyte transcriptome after CCB treatment, we identified little overlap in their transcriptome signatures. Verapamil is the only inhibitor that reduced the expression of contraction-related genes, such as MYH (myosin heavy chain) and troponin I, consistent with its depressive effects on contractile function. The reduction of these contraction-related genes may also explain the responsiveness of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy to verapamil in managing left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. This is the first study to identify the transcriptome signatures of different CCBs in human cardiomyocytes. The distinct gene expression patterns suggest that although the 4 inhibitors act on the same target, they may have distinct effects on normal cardiac cell physiology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31079550
doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.314202
pmc: PMC6610656
mid: NIHMS1529269
doi:
Substances chimiques
Calcium Channel Blockers
0
Amlodipine
1J444QC288
Verapamil
CJ0O37KU29
Myosin Heavy Chains
EC 3.6.4.1
Diltiazem
EE92BBP03H
Nifedipine
I9ZF7L6G2L
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
212-222Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL113006
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : P30 NS069375
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL130020
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCRR NIH HHS
ID : S10 RR029338
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL128170
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : T32 HL094274
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL126527
Pays : United States
Références
N Engl J Med. 1999 Nov 4;341(19):1447-57
pubmed: 10547409
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003 Jul;4(7):566-77
pubmed: 12838339
Can Med Assoc J. 1964 Mar 28;90:761-70
pubmed: 14132168
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1992 Jan;22(1):22-31
pubmed: 1532771
Clin Cardiol. 1992 Apr;15(4):235-42
pubmed: 1563126
Cell. 2006 Aug 25;126(4):663-76
pubmed: 16904174
Annu Rev Physiol. 2008;70:23-49
pubmed: 17988210
Am J Hypertens. 1991 Feb;4(2 Pt 2):185S-187S
pubmed: 1827017
Circ Res. 2008 May 23;102(10):1239-46
pubmed: 18403730
Circ Res. 2009 Jul 2;105(1):51-60
pubmed: 19478199
Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2009 Aug;2(4):362-70
pubmed: 20031608
J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2011 Mar;50(3):460-70
pubmed: 21111744
Nature. 2011 Mar 10;471(7337):230-4
pubmed: 21307850
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2011 Nov;301(5):H2006-17
pubmed: 21890694
J Clin Invest. 2012 Jan;122(1):280-90
pubmed: 22133878
Biomaterials. 2013 Mar;34(10):2399-411
pubmed: 23261219
Cell Stem Cell. 2013 Jan 3;12(1):101-13
pubmed: 23290139
Cardiovasc Res. 2013 May 1;98(2):177-86
pubmed: 23417040
Circulation. 2013 Apr 23;127(16):1677-91
pubmed: 23519760
Hypertension. 2013 Jul;62(1):48-54
pubmed: 23690342
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013 Sep;10(9):531-47
pubmed: 23900355
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2014 May;29(3):214-9
pubmed: 24576884
Nat Methods. 2014 Aug;11(8):855-60
pubmed: 24930130
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015 Feb 02;7(2):a006023
pubmed: 25646377
Circulation. 2015 Apr 28;131(17):1506-17; discussion 1517
pubmed: 25820336
Circ Res. 2015 Jun 19;117(1):80-8
pubmed: 26089365
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016 Jun;13(6):333-49
pubmed: 27009425
Nat Med. 2016 May;22(5):547-56
pubmed: 27089514
Cell Stem Cell. 2016 Sep 1;19(3):311-25
pubmed: 27545504
Front Physiol. 2016 Aug 05;7:334
pubmed: 27547188
Circulation. 2017 May 9;135(19):1832-1847
pubmed: 28167635
Circ Res. 2017 Mar 3;120(5):778-780
pubmed: 28254802
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017 May;16(5):309-310
pubmed: 28280260
Front Pharmacol. 2017 May 29;8:286
pubmed: 28611661
Development. 2018 Mar 8;145(5):
pubmed: 29519889
Circulation. 2018 Dec 4;138(23):2666-2681
pubmed: 29914921
Nat Protoc. 2018 Dec;13(12):3018-3041
pubmed: 30413796
Circulation. 2019 Feb 5;139(6):799-811
pubmed: 30586709
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1966 May;152(2):265-74
pubmed: 5944369
Cancer Res. 1983 Jul;43(7):3417-21
pubmed: 6850648
Hypertension. 1983 Jul-Aug;5(4 Pt 2):II18-24
pubmed: 6862586
Eur Heart J. 1997 Jan;18 Suppl A:A71-9
pubmed: 9049541
J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1997 Mar;29(3):1037-43
pubmed: 9152864