Dynamic interpersonal therapy for moderate to severe depression: a pilot randomized controlled and feasibility trial.
Adult
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
/ methods
Depression
/ therapy
Depressive Disorder, Major
/ therapy
England
Feasibility Studies
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Pilot Projects
Primary Health Care
/ statistics & numerical data
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Psychotherapy, Psychodynamic
/ methods
Surveys and Questionnaires
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Adults
DIT
IAPT
Improving Access to Psychological Therapies
dynamic interpersonal therapy
major depression
mentalization-based
psychodynamic
randomized controlled trial
time-limited treatment
Journal
Psychological medicine
ISSN: 1469-8978
Titre abrégé: Psychol Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 1254142
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
16
5
2019
medline:
13
4
2021
entrez:
16
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) services treat most patients in England who present to primary care with major depression. Psychodynamic psychotherapy is one of the psychotherapies offered. Dynamic Interpersonal Therapy (DIT) is a psychodynamic and mentalization-based treatment for depression. 16 sessions are delivered over approximately 5 months. Neither DIT's effectiveness relative to low-intensity treatment (LIT), nor the feasibility of randomizing patients to psychodynamic or cognitive-behavioural treatments (CBT) in an IAPT setting has been demonstrated. 147 patients were randomized in a 3:2:1 ratio to DIT (n = 73), LIT (control intervention; n = 54) or CBT (n = 20) in four IAPT treatment services in a combined superiority and feasibility design. Patients meeting criteria for major depressive disorder were assessed at baseline, mid-treatment (3 months) and post-treatment (6 months) using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-17), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and other self-rated questionnaire measures. Patients receiving DIT were also followed up 6 months post-completion. The DIT arm showed significantly lower HRSD-17 scores at the 6-month primary end-point compared with LIT (d = 0.70). Significantly more DIT patients (51%) showed clinically significant change on the HRSD-17 compared with LIT (9%). The DIT and CBT arms showed equivalence on most outcomes. Results were similar with the BDI-II. DIT showed benefit across a range of secondary outcomes. DIT delivered in a primary care setting is superior to LIT and can be appropriately compared with CBT in future RCTs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) services treat most patients in England who present to primary care with major depression. Psychodynamic psychotherapy is one of the psychotherapies offered. Dynamic Interpersonal Therapy (DIT) is a psychodynamic and mentalization-based treatment for depression. 16 sessions are delivered over approximately 5 months. Neither DIT's effectiveness relative to low-intensity treatment (LIT), nor the feasibility of randomizing patients to psychodynamic or cognitive-behavioural treatments (CBT) in an IAPT setting has been demonstrated.
METHODS
147 patients were randomized in a 3:2:1 ratio to DIT (n = 73), LIT (control intervention; n = 54) or CBT (n = 20) in four IAPT treatment services in a combined superiority and feasibility design. Patients meeting criteria for major depressive disorder were assessed at baseline, mid-treatment (3 months) and post-treatment (6 months) using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-17), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and other self-rated questionnaire measures. Patients receiving DIT were also followed up 6 months post-completion.
RESULTS
The DIT arm showed significantly lower HRSD-17 scores at the 6-month primary end-point compared with LIT (d = 0.70). Significantly more DIT patients (51%) showed clinically significant change on the HRSD-17 compared with LIT (9%). The DIT and CBT arms showed equivalence on most outcomes. Results were similar with the BDI-II. DIT showed benefit across a range of secondary outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
DIT delivered in a primary care setting is superior to LIT and can be appropriately compared with CBT in future RCTs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31084635
pii: S0033291719000928
doi: 10.1017/S0033291719000928
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1010-1019Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : PB-PG-0610-22287
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 541918
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : NF-SI-0514-10157
Pays : United Kingdom