Patients' reasons for adhering to long-term alendronate therapy.
Adult
Aged
Alendronate
/ administration & dosage
Bone Density
/ drug effects
Bone Density Conservation Agents
/ administration & dosage
Drug Administration Schedule
Educational Status
Female
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Italy
Longitudinal Studies
Medication Adherence
/ psychology
Middle Aged
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal
/ drug therapy
Osteoporotic Fractures
/ prevention & control
Retrospective Studies
Adherence
Alendronate
Long-term therapy
Osteoporosis
Journal
Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA
ISSN: 1433-2965
Titre abrégé: Osteoporos Int
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9100105
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
12
02
2019
accepted:
07
05
2019
pubmed:
16
5
2019
medline:
28
1
2020
entrez:
16
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We aimed to determine patients' reasons for continuing alendronate therapy over 5 years by administering a questionnaire. Bone mineral density, fractures, drugs, Charlson comorbidity index, and lifestyle factors were also considered. Education and awareness of the disease appeared highly associated with good alendronate adherence while worsening health status with discontinuation. Aim of this study was to investigate patients' reasons for adhering to long-term alendronate therapy (more than 5 years), as data is not available in the current literature regarding the reasons behind long-term adherence. We studied 204 long-term adherent alendronate users: 65 postmenopausal outpatients still adherent (group C, years on treatment = 8.70 ± 1.31) were compared to 139 age-matched patients who discontinued therapy (group S, years on treatment = 8.64 ± 1.43). We evaluated main biochemical parameters, BMD values, fractures, and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). A questionnaire was administered to analyze the reasons for long-term adherence. There were no significant differences between groups concerning baseline DXA values, number of fractures, and CCI. A higher education level was observed in group C (C 54% vs S 35% of patients, p = 0.001). At the time of interview, there was a significantly higher number of patients with a CCI of two in group S compared to the beginning of treatment (56% vs 43%, p = 0.04), together with a higher number of patients taking more than 3 drugs (22% vs 11%, p = 0.01) compared to basal evaluation. Forty-seven percent of patients reported new diseases during the treatment as the main reason for stopping alendronate. A multivariate, stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that awareness of the disease was highly associated with adherence (OR = 0.20; 95% CI 0.045-0.93, p = 0.04) followed by higher education (OR = 0.526, 95% CI 0.345-0.801, p = 0.003). Worsening of CCI was associated with discontinuation (OR = 2.75, 95% CI 1.033-7.324, p = 0.04). Education and disease awareness are associated with long-term alendronate adherence while competing health problems negatively impact adherence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31089764
doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05010-w
pii: 10.1007/s00198-019-05010-w
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bone Density Conservation Agents
0
Alendronate
X1J18R4W8P
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1627-1634Références
Osteoporos Int. 2015 Jun;26(6):1831-40
pubmed: 25822104
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Dec;29(12):2623-2637
pubmed: 30417253
Clin Chem. 2001;47(7):1314-6
pubmed: 11427468
Bone. 2013 Dec;57(2):423-8
pubmed: 24063946
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Apr;29(4):813-824
pubmed: 29260291
Osteoporos Int. 2010 Nov;21(11):1943-51
pubmed: 19967338
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83
pubmed: 3558716
Osteoporos Int. 2013 Jul;24(7):2079-97
pubmed: 23179576
Endocrine. 2014 Nov;47(2):456-62
pubmed: 25104272
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2002 Jan;56(1):21-30
pubmed: 11840176
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Mar;28(3):853-862
pubmed: 27766368
Mayo Clin Proc. 2007 Dec;82(12):1493-501
pubmed: 18053457
Intern Emerg Med. 2019 Jan;14(1):85-102
pubmed: 29948835
Osteoporos Int. 2014 Apr;25(4):1345-55
pubmed: 24445732
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Oct;27(10):3083-90
pubmed: 27624338
Osteoporos Int. 2015 Oct;26(10):2401-11
pubmed: 26282229
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Sep;21(9):1453-60
pubmed: 16197664
Mayo Clin Proc. 2006 Aug;81(8):1013-22
pubmed: 16901023
Calcif Tissue Int. 2012 Nov;91(5):335-42
pubmed: 22965625
Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(6):922-8
pubmed: 16609824
J Endocrinol Invest. 2016 May;39(5):491-3
pubmed: 26902997
J Endocrinol Invest. 2018 Dec;41(12):1359-1364
pubmed: 29761280
Osteoporos Int. 2003 Dec;14(12):978-82
pubmed: 14530829
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Mar;28(3):767-774
pubmed: 28093634
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Dec;28(12):3495-3500
pubmed: 28861636
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Mar;89(3):1117-23
pubmed: 15001596
J Bone Miner Res. 2010 May;25(5):976-82
pubmed: 20200926
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Apr;23(4):503-512
pubmed: 28345435
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 1;13(6):e0198006
pubmed: 29856795
Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(6):914-21
pubmed: 16538553