Sex Differences Persist in Time to Presentation, Revascularization, and Mortality in Myocardial Infarction Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Female
Health Status Disparities
Healthcare Disparities
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction
/ diagnosis
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
/ adverse effects
Prospective Studies
Registries
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
/ diagnosis
Sex Factors
Time Factors
Time-to-Treatment
Treatment Outcome
Victoria
/ epidemiology
ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction
non–ST‐segment elevation acute coronary syndrome
revascularization
Journal
Journal of the American Heart Association
ISSN: 2047-9980
Titre abrégé: J Am Heart Assoc
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101580524
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 05 2019
21 05 2019
Historique:
entrez:
17
5
2019
pubmed:
17
5
2019
medline:
25
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Background Timely revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention ( PCI ) reduces death following myocardial infarction. We evaluated if a sex gap in symptom-to-door ( STD ), door-to-balloon ( DTB ), and door-to- PCI time persists in contemporary patients, and its impact on mortality. Methods and Results From 2013 to 2016 the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry prospectively recruited 13 451 patients (22.5% female) from 30 centers with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction ( STEMI , 47.8%) or non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) (52.2%) who underwent PCI . Adjusted log-transformed STD and DTB time in the STEMI cohort and STD and door-to- PCI time in the NSTEMI cohort were analyzed using linear regression. Logistic regression was used to determine independent predictors of 30-day mortality. In STEMI patients, women had longer log- STD time (adjusted geometric mean ratio 1.20, 95% CI 1.12-1.28, P<0.001), log- DTB time (adjusted geometric mean ratio 1.12, 95% CI 1.05-1.20, P=0.001), and 30-day mortality (9.3% versus 6.5%, P=0.005) than men. Womens' adjusted geometric mean STD and DTB times were 28.8 and 7.7 minutes longer, respectively, than were mens' times. Women with NSTEMI had no difference in adjusted STD , door-to- PCI time, or early (<24 hours) versus late revascularization, compared with men. Female sex independently predicted a higher 30-day mortality (odds ratio 1.67, 95% CI 1.11-2.49, P=0.01) in STEMI but not in NSTEMI. Conclusions Women with STEMI have significant delays in presentation and revascularization with a higher 30-day mortality compared with men. The delay in STD time was 4-fold the delay in DTB time. Women with NSTEMI had no delay in presentation or revascularization, with mortality comparable to men. Public awareness campaigns are needed to address women's recognition and early action for STEMI .
Identifiants
pubmed: 31092091
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012161
pmc: PMC6585344
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e012161Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Oct;34(10):1939-1943
pubmed: 27425140
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 7;39(2):119-177
pubmed: 28886621
N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 5;369(10):901-9
pubmed: 24004117
JAMA. 2009 Aug 26;302(8):874-82
pubmed: 19706861
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Aug 21;6(8):
pubmed: 28862963
Heart Lung Circ. 2018 Apr;27(4):464-468
pubmed: 28811182
Lancet. 2017 Aug 19;390(10096):737-746
pubmed: 28778541
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jan 20;6(1):
pubmed: 28108465
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 15;71(19):2122-2132
pubmed: 29535061
BMJ Open. 2015 Jun 10;5(6):e007785
pubmed: 26063568
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jan 11;6(1):
pubmed: 28077385
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 19;158(4):261-70
pubmed: 23420234
BMJ Open. 2018 May 3;8(5):e020211
pubmed: 29724738
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 May 21;8(10):e012161
pubmed: 31092091
JAMA. 2000 Jun 14;283(22):2941-7
pubmed: 10865271
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec 28;8(15):1966-1974
pubmed: 26738667
Eur Heart J. 2012 Jan;33(1):51-60
pubmed: 19202154
Heart. 2007 Nov;93(11):1369-75
pubmed: 17933995
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jan 14;37(3):267-315
pubmed: 26320110
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jan 1;37(1):24-34
pubmed: 26530104
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Nov;174(11):1822-30
pubmed: 25265319
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Sep 17;42(6):991-7
pubmed: 13678918
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019 Apr;8(3):283-290
pubmed: 30406673
EuroIntervention. 2016 Aug 05;12(5):e542-9
pubmed: 27497354
Circulation. 2018 Feb 20;137(8):781-790
pubmed: 29459463
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 8;11(1):36-50
pubmed: 29301646
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Jun 1;107(11):1585-9
pubmed: 21420056
Int Emerg Nurs. 2014 Apr;22(2):88-93
pubmed: 24071742
Am Heart J. 2010 Jul;160(1):80-87.e3
pubmed: 20598976
Circulation. 2005 Apr 5;111(13):1611-8
pubmed: 15811868
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Mar 7;7(6):
pubmed: 29514807
J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Jan 13;3(1):e000590
pubmed: 24419737
Lancet. 2015 Jun 20;385(9986):2465-76
pubmed: 25791214
Heart Lung Circ. 2018 Apr;27(4):451-463
pubmed: 29291960
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 May;8(6):791-796
pubmed: 25999100