Multilayer longitudinal strain can help predict the development of no-reflow in patients with acute coronary syndrome without ST elevation.
Acute Coronary Syndrome
/ diagnostic imaging
Adult
Coronary Stenosis
/ diagnostic imaging
Echocardiography, Doppler, Pulsed
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
No-Reflow Phenomenon
/ diagnostic imaging
Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction
/ diagnostic imaging
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
/ adverse effects
Predictive Value of Tests
Reproducibility of Results
Risk Factors
Severity of Illness Index
Treatment Outcome
Ventricular Function, Left
Acute coronary syndrome
Multilayer longitudinal strain
No-reflow
Journal
The international journal of cardiovascular imaging
ISSN: 1875-8312
Titre abrégé: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100969716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Oct 2019
Historique:
received:
06
01
2019
accepted:
06
05
2019
pubmed:
17
5
2019
medline:
4
12
2019
entrez:
17
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
No-reflow (NR) is one of the major complications of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). We aim to assess the value of multilayer longitudinal strain parameter to predict NR in patients with NSTEMI and preserved ejection fraction. 230 consecutive patients who were admitted to the emergency department and diagnosed with NSTEMI were prospectively included in this study. Echocardiography was performed 1 h before angiography. Specific analysis for endocardial, mid-myocardial and epicardial layers were performed by two-dimensional (2D) speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) for multilayer longitudinal strain. NR was described as flow grade of ≤ TIMI 2 when mechanical occlusions like dissection, intimal tear, arterial spasm and thromboembolism during angiography were excluded. 49 of 168 patients admitted to the study had NR. No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding age and gender. Multilayer longitudinal strain imaging (endocard, midmyocard and epicard) revealed lower strain values particularly in endocardial layer in patients with NR (GLS-endocard: - 14.14 ± 1.39/- 17.41 ± 2.34, p < 0.001; GLS-midmyocard: - 14.81 ± 1.40/17.81 ± 2.22, p < 0.001; GLS-epicard: - 16.14 ± 1.38/18.22 ± 2.00, p < 0.001). GLS-endocard, GLS-midmyocard, GLS-epicard and ST depression were found to be statistically significant independents parameters respectively to predict NR phenomenon (GLS-endocard: OR: 2.193, p < 0.001; GLS-midmyocard: OR: 1.510, p: 0.016; GLS-epicard: OR: 1.372, p: 0.035; ST depression: OR: 3.694, p: 0.014). We revealed that left ventricular strain study with speckle tracking echocardiography predicts NR formation. This noninvasive method may be useful for detecting NR formation in patients with NSTEMI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31093895
doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01623-8
pii: 10.1007/s10554-019-01623-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1811-1821Références
Am Heart J. 1946 Jun;31:677-84
pubmed: 20988231
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000 Sep;51(1):27-31; discussion 32
pubmed: 10973014
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Feb 21;47(4):789-93
pubmed: 16487846
Circ Res. 1975 Aug;37(2):191-9
pubmed: 1149193
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Jan 15;111(2):178-84
pubmed: 23111142
Circulation. 1996 Mar 1;93(5):879-88
pubmed: 8598078
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Nov 1;20(5):1251-60
pubmed: 1401629
Am J Cardiol. 1998 Jun 18;81(12A):8G-12G
pubmed: 9662220
Am J Cardiol. 2007 Feb 15;99(4):442-5
pubmed: 17293180
Arch Inst Cardiol Mex. 1945;15(4):315-26
pubmed: 21011762
Circulation. 1999 May 4;99(17):2345-57
pubmed: 10226103
Clin Cardiol. 2015 Apr;38(4):208-15
pubmed: 25892404
Int J Cardiol. 1998 May 29;65 Suppl 1:S23-8
pubmed: 9706823
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014 May;27(5):512-9
pubmed: 24612899
Heart. 1999 Jul;82(1):62-7
pubmed: 10377311
Circulation. 1996 Sep 15;94(6):1269-75
pubmed: 8822979
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 May 25;55(21):2383-9
pubmed: 20488311
Circulation. 2008 Jun 17;117(24):3152-6
pubmed: 18559715
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Dec 15;98(12):1581-6
pubmed: 17145214
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jan 14;37(3):267-315
pubmed: 26320110
Circulation. 1992 May;85(5):1699-705
pubmed: 1572028
Am Heart J. 1995 Aug;130(2):239-43
pubmed: 7631601
Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010 May;11(4):377-85
pubmed: 20056658
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Mar;16(3):233-70
pubmed: 25712077
Circulation. 1998 Dec 1;98(22):2377-82
pubmed: 9832481
Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010 Jul;11(6):501-8
pubmed: 20185525
Circulation. 2004 Mar 9;109(9):1121-6
pubmed: 14967718
Echocardiography. 2011 Nov;28(10):1148-55
pubmed: 21967399
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2014;15(1):38-51
pubmed: 24762465
Heart. 2010 Oct;96(19):1550-6
pubmed: 20643662
Circulation. 1996 Jan 15;93(2):223-8
pubmed: 8548892
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jul;13(7):579-87
pubmed: 22166593
Am J Physiol. 1981 Jun;240(6):H920-6
pubmed: 7246754
Clin Chem. 1992 Mar;38(3):386-93
pubmed: 1547556
Am J Cardiol. 1998 Oct 15;82(8):932-7
pubmed: 9794347
Circulation. 1995 Feb 15;91(4):1143-53
pubmed: 7850953
Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009 Jul;10(5):695-701
pubmed: 19401300
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Dec;33(12):1883-1889
pubmed: 28664479
Am Heart J. 2010 Jan;159(1):148-57
pubmed: 20102881
Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2013 Mar 1;11(2):278-85
pubmed: 23506504
Arch Inst Cardiol Mex. 1998 May-Jun;68(3):247-52
pubmed: 9810347
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985 Mar;5(3):593-8
pubmed: 3973255
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Nov 15;223:1045-1052
pubmed: 27592047
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Oct;36(4):1202-9
pubmed: 11028471
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Apr;23(4):351-69; quiz 453-5
pubmed: 20362924
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Dec 1;72(7):950-7
pubmed: 19021281