Prophylactic antibiotics in the prevention of infection after operative vaginal delivery (ANODE): a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Adolescent
Adult
Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination
/ administration & dosage
Anti-Bacterial Agents
/ administration & dosage
Antibiotic Prophylaxis
Delivery, Obstetric
/ adverse effects
Female
Humans
Intention to Treat Analysis
Middle Aged
Pregnancy
Puerperal Infection
/ prevention & control
Surgical Wound Infection
/ prevention & control
Young Adult
Journal
Lancet (London, England)
ISSN: 1474-547X
Titre abrégé: Lancet
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985213R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 06 2019
15 06 2019
Historique:
received:
01
03
2019
revised:
20
03
2019
accepted:
21
03
2019
pubmed:
18
5
2019
medline:
12
7
2019
entrez:
18
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Risk factors for maternal infection are clearly recognised, including caesarean section and operative vaginal birth. Antibiotic prophylaxis at caesarean section is widely recommended because there is clear systematic review evidence that it reduces incidence of maternal infection. Current WHO guidelines do not recommend routine antibiotic prophylaxis for women undergoing operative vaginal birth because of insufficient evidence of effectiveness. We aimed to investigate whether antibiotic prophylaxis prevented maternal infection after operative vaginal birth. In a blinded, randomised controlled trial done at 27 UK obstetric units, women (aged ≥16 years) were allocated to receive a single dose of intravenous amoxicillin and clavulanic acid or placebo (saline) following operative vaginal birth at 36 weeks gestation or later. The primary outcome was confirmed or suspected maternal infection within 6 weeks of delivery defined by a new prescription of antibiotics for specific indications, confirmed systemic infection on culture, or endometritis. We did an intention-to-treat analysis. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number 11166984, and is closed to accrual. Between March 13, 2016, and June 13, 2018, 3427 women were randomly assigned to treatment: 1719 to amoxicillin and clavulanic acid, and 1708 to placebo. Seven women withdrew, leaving 1715 in the amoxicillin and clavulanic acid group and 1705 in the placebo groups. Primary outcome data were missing for 195 (6%) women. Significantly fewer women allocated to amoxicillin and clavulanic acid had a confirmed or suspected infection (180 [11%] of 1619) than women allocated to placebo (306 [19%] of 1606; risk ratio 0·58, 95% CI 0·49-0·69; p<0·0001). One woman in the placebo group reported a skin rash and two women in the amoxicillin and clavulanic acid reported other allergic reactions, one of which was reported as a serious adverse event. Two other serious adverse events were reported, neither was considered causally related to the treatment. This trial shows benefit of a single dose of prophylactic antibiotic after operative vaginal birth and guidance from WHO and other national organisations should be changed to reflect this. NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Risk factors for maternal infection are clearly recognised, including caesarean section and operative vaginal birth. Antibiotic prophylaxis at caesarean section is widely recommended because there is clear systematic review evidence that it reduces incidence of maternal infection. Current WHO guidelines do not recommend routine antibiotic prophylaxis for women undergoing operative vaginal birth because of insufficient evidence of effectiveness. We aimed to investigate whether antibiotic prophylaxis prevented maternal infection after operative vaginal birth.
METHODS
In a blinded, randomised controlled trial done at 27 UK obstetric units, women (aged ≥16 years) were allocated to receive a single dose of intravenous amoxicillin and clavulanic acid or placebo (saline) following operative vaginal birth at 36 weeks gestation or later. The primary outcome was confirmed or suspected maternal infection within 6 weeks of delivery defined by a new prescription of antibiotics for specific indications, confirmed systemic infection on culture, or endometritis. We did an intention-to-treat analysis. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number 11166984, and is closed to accrual.
FINDINGS
Between March 13, 2016, and June 13, 2018, 3427 women were randomly assigned to treatment: 1719 to amoxicillin and clavulanic acid, and 1708 to placebo. Seven women withdrew, leaving 1715 in the amoxicillin and clavulanic acid group and 1705 in the placebo groups. Primary outcome data were missing for 195 (6%) women. Significantly fewer women allocated to amoxicillin and clavulanic acid had a confirmed or suspected infection (180 [11%] of 1619) than women allocated to placebo (306 [19%] of 1606; risk ratio 0·58, 95% CI 0·49-0·69; p<0·0001). One woman in the placebo group reported a skin rash and two women in the amoxicillin and clavulanic acid reported other allergic reactions, one of which was reported as a serious adverse event. Two other serious adverse events were reported, neither was considered causally related to the treatment.
INTERPRETATION
This trial shows benefit of a single dose of prophylactic antibiotic after operative vaginal birth and guidance from WHO and other national organisations should be changed to reflect this.
FUNDING
NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31097213
pii: S0140-6736(19)30773-1
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30773-1
pmc: PMC6584562
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination
74469-00-4
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2395-2403Investigateurs
Marian Knight
(M)
Helen Enderby
(H)
Derek Tuffnell
(D)
Kim Hinshaw
(K)
Ranee Thakar
(R)
Abdul H Sultan
(AH)
Julia Sanders
(J)
Dharmintra Pasupathy
(D)
Philip Moore
(P)
James Gray
(J)
Oliver Rivero-Arias
(O)
Edmund Juszczak
(E)
Louise Linsell
(L)
Aethele Khunda
(A)
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : ErratumIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Références
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Nov;126(5):e56-65
pubmed: 26488523
Reprod Health. 2018 Jan 30;15(1):16
pubmed: 29382352
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 28;(10):CD007482
pubmed: 25350672
South Med J. 1989 Aug;82(8):960-2
pubmed: 2669154
BJOG. 2012 Mar;119(4):474-83
pubmed: 22251396
PLoS Med. 2014 Jul 08;11(7):e1001672
pubmed: 25003759
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Apr;56:107-113
pubmed: 30392949
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2004 Aug;26(8):747-61
pubmed: 15307980
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 05;11(2):e0148343
pubmed: 26849801
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;130(2):366-373
pubmed: 28697109
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 05;8:CD004455
pubmed: 28779515
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 10;7(2):e013008
pubmed: 28188152
Lancet. 2017 Sep 16;390(10100):1151-1210
pubmed: 28919116
Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Jun;2(6):e323-33
pubmed: 25103301
Health Econ. 2018 Jan;27(1):7-22
pubmed: 28833869
Trials. 2018 Jul 24;19(1):395
pubmed: 30041702
BJOG. 2017 Aug;124(9):1365-1372
pubmed: 28236337
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Apr;56:93-106
pubmed: 30992125
Nat Med. 2016 Jul 7;22(7):713-22
pubmed: 27387886