Retrospective review of CT brain image quality, diagnostic adequacy and radiation dose in a paediatric population imaged at a non-paediatric tertiary hospital.


Journal

Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology
ISSN: 1754-9485
Titre abrégé: J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101469340

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Historique:
received: 05 02 2019
accepted: 07 04 2019
pubmed: 18 5 2019
medline: 11 3 2020
entrez: 18 5 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Minimising radiation exposure in paediatric imaging examinations whilst maintaining acceptable diagnostic quality continues to present a challenge. The aims of this study were to assess institutional compliance of paediatric CT brain (CTB) examinations performed in an adult hospital with ARPANSA radiation dose recommendations and to compare qualitative CTB diagnostic acceptability with objective imaging parameters and radiation dose. A retrospective review of 115 consecutive paediatric CTB examinations was undertaken at an adult tertiary referral centre in Australia over a 2-year period. Dose length product (DLP) was compared with the ARPANSA standards. CTB image quality was subjectively classified by two neuroradiologists independently, with discordant results resolved by consensus. Objective assessment of image quality included measurements of signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) of grey and white matter. All patient scans complied with ARPANSA DLP recommendations; however, 10 out of 115 scans were classified as being of diagnostically suboptimal image quality. These scans had significantly lower mean DLP values compared with diagnostically adequate examinations (105.1 vs 379.2 mGy.cm; P < 0.0001). CTB scans of adequate diagnostic quality, when compared to suboptimal scans, had significantly higher CNR (1.8 vs 1.1; P < 0.0001) and SNR in grey (7.1 vs 4.6; P < 0.0001) and white matter (5.6 vs 3.8; P < 0.0001). All CTB examinations in this series complied with the ARPANSA DLP recommendations; however, 9% were of suboptimal diagnostic image quality. While it is important to minimize unnecessary radiation exposure, our results suggest that excessively low DLP values can lead to suboptimal diagnostic image quality.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31099491
doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12894
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

596-601

Informations de copyright

© 2019 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists.

Références

Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, Berdon WE. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176: 289-96.
Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography - an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2277-84.
Brady Z, Cain TM, Johnston PN. Paediatric CT imaging trends in Australia. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2011; 55: 132-42.
Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z et al. Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ 2013; 346.
Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2012; 380: 499-505.
Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Williams A et al. The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr 2013; 167: 700.
International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Radiological protection and safety in medicine. ICRP Publ 73. 1996; Annals of the ICRP 26(2).
National Diagnostic Reference Level Service in more detail[Internet]. ARPANSA. 2018 [cited 2018 Dec 23]. Available from: https://www.arpansa.gov.au/research-and-expertise/surveys/national-diagnostic-reference-level-service/in-more-detail
Mahesh M. Update on radiation safety and dose reduction in pediatric neuroradiology. Pediatr Radiol 2015; 45(S3): 370-4.
Costello JE, Cecava ND, Tucker JE, Bau JL. CT radiation dose: current controversies and dose reduction strategies. Am J Roentgenol 2013; 201: 1283-90.
Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A, Kujak J, Pavlicek W. Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194: 191-9.
Thibault J-B, Sauer KD, Bouman CA, Hsieh J. A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. Med Phys 2007; 34: 4526-44.
Barkovich AJ, Kjos BO, Jackson DE, Norman D. Normal maturation of the neonatal and infant brain: MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 1988; 166: 173-80.
Mewes AUJ, Huppi PS, Als H et al. Regional brain development in serial magnetic resonance imaging of low-risk preterm infants. Pediatrics 2006; 118: 23-33.
Park JE, Choi YH, Cheon J-E et al. Image quality and radiation dose of brain computed tomography in children: effects of decreasing tube voltage from 120 kVp to 80 kVp. Pediatr Radiol 2017; 47: 710-7.
Kilic K, Erbas G, Guryildirim M, Arac M, Ilgit E, Coskun B. Lowering the dose in head CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32: 1578-82.
Vorona GA, Zuccoli G, Sutcavage T, Clayton BL, Ceschin RC, Panigrahy A. The use of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in pediatric head CT: a feasibility study. Am J Neuroradiol 2013; 34: 205-11.
McKnight CD, Watcharotone K, Ibrahim M, Christodoulou E, Baer AH, Parmar HA. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: reducing dose while preserving image quality in the pediatric head CT examination. Pediatr Radiol 2014; 44: 997-1003.
Mirro AE, Brady SL, Kaufman RA. Full dose-reduction potential of statistical iterative reconstruction for head CT protocols in a predominantly pediatric population. Am J Neuroradiol 2016; 37: 1199-205.
Kaul D, Kahn J, Huizing L et al. Dose reduction in paediatric cranial CT via iterative reconstruction: a clinical study in 78 patients. Clin Radiol 2016; 71: 1168-77.

Auteurs

Lisa Luo-Lan Ling (LL)

Department of Radiology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.

Greg Fitt (G)

Department of Radiology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.

Mark Begbie (M)

Department of Radiology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.

Catriona Anne Fleming (CA)

Department of Paediatrics, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.

Yuliya Perchyonok (Y)

Department of Radiology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH